Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:30:34.420Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Legal authority and savagery in judicial rhetoric: sexual violence and the criminal courts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 April 2011

David Gurnham
David Gurnham*
Affiliation:
School of Law, University of Manchester
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article explores narrative devices in legal rhetoric, and the use of these devices for asserting the authority to distinguish lawful from unlawful inflictions of bodily harm. The argument made here is that the moral language adopted by judges in criminal appeal judgments on risky sexual and/or violent consensual acts embraces a set of interconnecting narratives otherwise observed in literature, and relating to gender, sexuality and race. I try to show how the reading of these legal cases is enriched by identifying these narratives, locating them as rhetorical strategies and reflecting on their uses in judicial decision-making. In particular, I argue that in the case-law explored here, these interconnected narratives are deployed in order to assert law's dominance over an imagined ‘savage’ other. Through this ongoing repudiation of savagery the distinctions between normative and non-normative, violent and non-violent, lawful and unlawful are constructed.

Type
Articles
Information
International Journal of Law in Context , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , June 2011 , pp. 117 - 137
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Athanassoulis, Nafsika (2002) ‘The Role of Consent in Sado-masochistic practices’, Res Publica 8(2): 141–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bamforth, N. (1994) ‘Sado-masochism and Consent’, Criminal Law Review (Sept): 661–64.Google Scholar
Barnett, H. (1998) Introduction to Feminist Jurisprudence. London and Sydney: Cavendish Publishing.Google Scholar
Bersani, Leo (1988) ‘Is the Rectum a Grave?’ in Crimp (1998), 197–222.Google Scholar
Booth, Wayne C. (2004) The Rhetoric of Rhetoric. Malden, MA and Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Cranor, Carl F. (1979) ‘Legal Moralism Reconsidered’ Ethics 89(2): 147–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crimp, Douglas (ed.) (1988) Aids: Cultural Analysis, Cultural Activism. London and Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Darian-smith, Eve (1995) ‘Rabies Rides the Fast-train: Transnational Interactions in Post-colonial Times’, Law and Critique 6(1): 75–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dean, T. (2000) Beyond Sexuality. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (1992) ‘Force of Law: The Mystical Foundations of Authority’ in Cornell, D., Rosenfeld, M. and Carlson, D. (eds), Deconstruction and the Possibility of Justice. London and New York: Routledge, 3–67.Google Scholar
Dymkowski, Christine (ed.) (2000) The Tempest. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Erin, C. (2007) ‘The Rightful Domain of the Criminal Law’ in Erin, C. and Ost, S., The Criminal Justice System and Health Care. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 237–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Euripides, (2006) The Bacchae and Other Plays. Davie, John, trans. London: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
Fanon, Franz (1963) The Wretched of the Earth. Farrington, Constance, trans. New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar
Fanon, Franz (1986) Black Skin, White Masks. Markmann, Charles Lam, trans. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Feinberg, Joel (1984) Harm to Others. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, Peter (1999) ‘Passions out of Place: Law, Incommensurability and Resistance’ in Darian-Smith, E. and Fitzpatrick, P. (eds), Laws of the Postcolonial. Michigan: University of Michigan Press, 1999, 39–69.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, Peter (2001) Modernism and the Grounds of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilman, Sander L. (1988) ‘Aids and Syphilis: The Iconography of Disease’ in Crimp (1988), 87–107.Google Scholar
Gurnham, David (2009) Memory, Imagination, Justice. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Harrington, John (2009) ‘Migration and Access to Health Care in English Medical Law: A Rhetorical Critique’, International Journal of Law in Context 4(4): 315–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulme, Peter (1986) Colonial Encounters: Europe and the Native Caribbean, 1492–1797. London and New York: Methuen.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, Darren Lenard (1999) ‘Ignoring the Sexualisation of Race: Heteronormativity, Critical Race Theory and Anti-racist Politics’, Buffalo Law Review 47(1): 1–116.Google Scholar
Keywood, Kirsty (2000) ‘My Body and Other Stories: Anorexia Nervosa and the Legal Politics of Embodiment’, Social and Legal Studies 9(4): 495–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khan, U. (2009) ‘A Woman's Right to be Spanked: Testing the Limits of Tolerance of SM in the Socio-legal Imaginary’, Law and Sexuality 18: 79–119.Google Scholar
Lamming, George (2004) ‘A Monster, a Child, a Slave’ in Hulme, Peter and Sherman, William H. (eds), The Tempest: William Shakespeare. Sources and Contexts, Criticism, Rewritings and Appropriations. New York and London: Norton, 148–68.Google Scholar
Maclean, Alasdair (2009) Autonomy, Informed Consent and Medical Law: A Relational Challenge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mannoni, O. (1956) Prospero and Caliban: The Psychology of Colonization. Rowesland, Pamela, trans. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Martin, Emily (1994) Flexible Bodies: Tracking Immunity in American Culture – from the Days of Polio to the Age of Aids. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Monk, Daniel (2009) ‘Reckless Trials?: The Criminalization of the Sexual Transmission of HIV’, Radical Philosophy 156: 2–6. Online: http://www.radicalphilosophy.com/default.asp?channel_id=2187editorial_id=28201 [accessed 4/10/10].Google Scholar
Moran, Leslie J. (1996) The Homosexual(ity) of Law. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nilsson, L. (1985) The Body Victorious. New York: Delacorte.Google Scholar
Puar, Jasbir K. (2007) Terrorist Assemblages: Homonationalism in Queer Times. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Raffield, P. (2008) '"Terras Astrae Reliqui": Titus Andronicus and the Loss of Justice' in Raffield, P. and Watt, G. (eds.), Shakespeare and the Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 203–220.Google Scholar
Ramage, S. (2008) ‘Witchcraft, Lollardy and the Meaning of “Evil”’, Criminal Lawyer 187: 9–10.Google Scholar
Roberts, Paul (1997) ‘Consent to Injury: How Far Can You Go?’ Law Quarterly Review 113: 27–35.Google Scholar
Said, Edward (1978) Orientalism. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Said, Edward (1994) Culture and Imperialism. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
Schindler, L. W. (1988) Understanding the Immune System. Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William (1954) The Tempest. Kermode, Frank (ed.), Arden Shakespeare, 5th edn.London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William (2000) The Tempest. Vaughan, Alden T. and Vaughan, Virginia Mason (eds.), Arden Shakespeare, Third Series, 3rd edn.London: Thomas Nelson & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sithamparanathan, A. (2002) ‘Noble Art of Self-defence or Unlawful Barbarism?’, Entertainment Law Review 13(8): 183–87.Google Scholar
Stoler, Ann (2002) Carnal Knowledge and Imperial Power: Race and the Intimate in Colonial Rule. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Stychin, Carl F. (1995) Law's Desire: Sexuality and the Limits of Justice. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Treichler, Paula A. (1988) ‘Aids, Homophobia and Biomedical Discourse: An Epidemic of Signification’ in Crimp (1988), 31–70.Google Scholar
Weaitt, Matthew (2005) ‘Criminal Law and the Sexual Transmission of HIV: R v. Dica’, Modern Law Review 68(1): 121–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, E. (2003) Empire of Capital. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar