Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T20:40:15.301Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Human dignity: comparative and conceptual debates*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2010

Stephen Riley
Stephen Riley*
Affiliation:
Sheffield Hallam University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Is there a stable set of practices or assumptions surrounding dignity, and would these necessarily denote a single foundation sustaining that stability? Two contemporary debates offer contrasting approaches to these questions. In the first, two jurists, who share agreement over the appearances of dignity in post-1945 jurisprudence, disagree as to whether these appearances form an emerging ius commune or a contingent set of conceptions. The second, comparative, debate explores the functional consequences of dignity’s aristocratic resonances. One position posits a continuing relationship between dignity and aristocratic nobility; the other, a functional division between dignity-within-aristocracy and dignity-within-democracy. This article insists that clarification of these debates depends upon a distinction between the epistemology and ontology of dignity, and, further, a distinction between dignity’s genealogy and its grammar. It concludes that a complex genealogical inheritance is at the heart of much disagreement, and that attention to dignity’s use clarifies its deficiencies and its continuing appeal.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Journal of Law in Context , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , June 2010 , pp. 117 - 138
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agamben, Giorgio (2002) Remnants of Auschwitz: The Witness and the Archive. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Agamben, Giorgio (2005) State of Exception, trans. K. Attell. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Austin, John L. (1962) How to do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bloch, Ernst (1961/1988) Natural Law and Human Dignity, trans. Schmidt, D. J.. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Burke, Edmund (1790/1969) Reflections on the Revolution in France. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Cancik, Hubert (2002) ‘ “Dignity of Man” and “Persona” in Stoic Anthropology: Some Remarks on Cicero, De Officiis I, 105–107’, in David, Kretzmer and Eckart, Klein (eds) The Concept of Human Dignity in Human Rights Discourse. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 19–39.Google Scholar
Carozza, Paolo G. (2008) ‘Human Dignity and Judicial Interpretation of Human Rights: A Reply’, European Journal of International Law 19(5): 931–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caygill, Howard (1995) A Kant Dictionary. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cicero, (2000) On Obligations, trans. Walsh, P. G.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cotterrell, Roger (2007) ‘Is it so Bad to be Different?’, in Esin, Örücü and David, Nelken (eds) Comparative Law: A Handbook. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 149–51.Google Scholar
Daube, D. (1943) ‘Personality in Roman Private Law by P. W. Duff ’, The Journal of Roman Studies 33(1/2): 86–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eberle, Edward J. (2002) Dignity and Liberty: Constitutional Visions in Germany and the United States. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel (1966/2002) The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gallie, Walter B. (1956) ‘Essentially Contested Concepts’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56: 167–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glendon, Mary A. (2001) A World Made New: Eleanor Roosevelt and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Glover, Jonathan (2001) Humanity: A Moral History of the Twentieth Century. London: Pimlico Books.Google Scholar
Harris, Daniel; O‘Boyle, Michael and Warbrick, Colin (1995) Law of the European Convention on Human Rights. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Henham, Ralph (2005) Punishment and Process in International Criminal Trials. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Hill, Thomas E. (2000) Respect, Pluralism and Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchings, Patrick A. E. (1972) Kant on Absolute Value. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1785/1948) Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals, trans. Paton, H. J.. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1797/1996) The Metaphysics of Morals, trans. Gregor, M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kommers, David P. (1989) The Constitutional Jurisprudence of the Republic of Germany. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Kretzmer, David and Klein, Eckart (eds) (2002) The Concept of Human Dignity in Human Rights Discourse. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristellar, Paul O. (1979) Renaissance Thought and its Sources. New York: Colombia University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, R. W. (1956) The Elements of Roman Law, 4th edn. London: Sweet and Maxwell.Google Scholar
Liptak, Adam (2009) ‘Ginsburg Shares Views on Influence of Foreign Law on Her Court, and Vice Versa’, New York Times, 11 April 2009, A14.Google Scholar
Malpas, Jeff and Lickiss, Norelle (eds) (2007) Perspectives on Human Dignity: A Conversation. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mccrudden, Christopher (2008) ‘Human Dignity and Judicial Interpretation of Human Rights’, European Journal of International Law 19(4): 655–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew (2008) ‘The Origins of Human Rights Regimes: Democratic Delegation in Postwar Europe’ in Henry, Steiner, Philip, Alston and Ryan, Goodman (eds) International Human Rights in Context: Law, Politics, Morals, 3rd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 934–36.Google Scholar
Neethling, Johann (2006) ‘Personality Rights’ in Smits, Jan M. (ed.) Elgar Encyclopedia of Comparative Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 539.Google Scholar
Neuman, Gerald L. (2003) ‘On Fascist Honour and Human Dignity: A Sceptical Response’ in Christian, Joerges and Ghaleigh, Navraj Singh (eds) Darker Legacies of Law in Europe: The Shadow of National Socialism and Fascism over Europe and its Legal Traditions. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 267–74.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich (1893/1998) On the Genealogy of Morality. Cambridge, MA: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Paine, Thomas (1791/1969) The Rights of Man. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven (2008) ‘The Stupidity of Dignity: Conservative Bioethicists’ Latest, Most Dangerous Ploy’, New Republic, 28 May 2008, 30–31.Google Scholar
Simmonds, Nigel (2008) Central Issues in Jurisprudence: Justice, Law and Rights. London: Sweet and Maxwell.Google Scholar
Solomon, Robert C. (1988) Continental Philosophy Since 1750: The Rise and Fall of the Self. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles (1992) Sources of the Self: The Making of Modern Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van Boven, Thomas (1982) ‘Distinguishing Criteria of Human Rights’ in Vasak, Karel (ed.) The International Dimension of Human Rights. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press/UNESCO.Google Scholar
Van Zyl Smit, Dirk (2002) Taking Life Imprisonment Seriously in National and International Law. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Whitman, James Q. (2000) ‘Enforcing Civility and Respect: Three Societies’, Yale Law Journal 109(6): 1279–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitman, James Q. (2003) ‘On Nazi “Honour” and the New European “Dignity”’ in Christian, Joerges and Ghaleigh, Navraj Singh (eds) Darker Legacies of Law in Europe: The Shadow of National Socialism and Fascism over Europe and its Legal Traditions. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 247.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1953/2005) Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar