Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T21:36:56.269Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Scheduling Monuments: The Rose Theatre Case

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 June 2007

Joanna Goyder
Joanna Goyder
Affiliation:
European Co-Ordinator, Baker and McKenzie, Brussels
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

1 summary

In R v Secretary of State for the Environment ex parte Rose Theatre Trust Co [1990] 1 All ER 754, Schiemann J. held that no ordinary member of the public, nor even a very large number of members of the public who have joined together for that very purpose, has any standing to challenge a decision by the Secretary of State for the Environment not to schedule a site as a monument of national importance under Section 1(3) of the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Areas Act 1979. Moreover, the Secretary of State may base the exercise of his discretion on a number of factors in addition to the consideration of whether or not the site is a monument of national importance.

Type
Case Notes
Information
International Journal of Cultural Property , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , July 1992 , pp. 353 - 358
Copyright
Copyright © International Cultural Property Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)