No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Review of David A. Scott, Art: Authenticity, Restoration and Forgery. 500 pp. Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles, Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press, 2016
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 October 2017
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Book Review
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © International Cultural Property Society 2017
References
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Brandi, Cesare, and Basile, Giuseppe. 2005. Theory of Restoration. Rome: Instituto Centrale per il Restauro.Google Scholar
De Clerq, Rafael. 2013. “The Metaphysics of Restoration.”
British Journal of Aesthetics
53, no. 3: 261–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutton, Denis. 2003. “Authenticity in Art.” In The Oxford Handbook of Aesthetics, edited by Levinson, Jerrold, 258–74. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goodman, Nelson. 1968. Languages of Art: An Approach to a Theory of Symbols. Indianapolis: Bobb-Merrill.Google Scholar
Rowe, Mark. 2013. “The Problem of Perfect Fakes.” In Philosophy and the Arts, edited by O’Hear, Anthony, 151–75. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sagoff, Mark. 1978. “On Restoring and Reproducing Art.”
Journal of Philosophy
75, no. 9: 453–70.Google Scholar
Scott, David A. 2015. “Conservation and Authenticity: Interactions and Enquiries.”
Studies in Conservation
60, no. 5: 291–305.Google Scholar
Scott, David A. 2016. Art: Authenticity, Restoration and Forgery.
Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles, Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar