Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T23:17:42.402Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rejoinder by Alan Audi

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 September 2007

Alan Audi
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

I am grateful for the responses to the piece. With admirable concision, Professor Beebe has summarized the promise and perils of legal semiotics and the challenges ahead. He is right to note that any “moral, ethical, and political” argument can be broken down with the same tools used to break down legal argument; but one might be tempted to add that having done away with law's aura of authority and diminished the persuasive force of legal arguments may be reward enough for now, at least in the realm of cultural property argument.

Type
REJOINDER
Information
International Journal of Cultural Property , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , May 2007 , pp. 164 - 167
Copyright
© 2007 International Cultural Property Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)