Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T07:27:37.412Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“Purchased in Hong Kong”: Is Hong Kong the Best Place to Buy Stolen or Looted Antiquities?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 December 2017

Steven Gallagher
Steven Gallagher*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Law, Chinese University of Hong Kong, People’s Republic of China; Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

The looting of antiquities from archaeological sites has received widespread coverage in the media. Concerns about the loss of heritage have resulted in international multilateral and bilateral agreements intended to prevent the illicit trade in looted antiquities. China has suffered from the looting of its archaeological sites for centuries, but the problem has been exacerbated in recent years because of the increased demand for Chinese antiquities and the consequent sharp increase in market prices. China has requested international assistance to combat the illicit trade in its heritage. It is strange therefore that one of China’s special administrative regions—Hong Kong—also one of the world’s major art markets, retains a “legal absurdity,”1 which may protect the buyer of stolen or looted goods from claims for the return of stolen items. This statutory provision may result in the bizarre outcome that goods stolen from a museum or looted from an archaeological site and then purchased from a shop or market in Hong Kong may be protected from claims for their return; this protection may apply even if the loser is the Chinese state.

Keywords

antiquitiesstolen propertymarket overtChinaHong Konglaw
Type
Research Article
Information
International Journal of Cultural Property , Volume 24 , Issue 4 , November 2017 , pp. 479 - 496
Copyright
Copyright © International Cultural Property Society 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Brodie, Neil. 1999. “Illicit Antiquities: The Situation in South-East Asia.” Paper presented at the Art Crime Protecting Art, Protecting Artists and Protecting Consumers Conference, Australian Institute of Criminology, Sydney, Australia, 2–3 December.Google Scholar
Bull, Toby. 2013. “Property of a Hong Kong Gentleman, Art Crime in Hong Kong—Buyer Beware.” Association for Research into Crimes against Art, Art and Cultural Heritage Conference, Amelia, Italy, 21–23 June, http://art-crime.blogspot.hk/2013/08/2013-arca-art-and-cultural-heritage.html (accessed 7 November 2017).Google Scholar
Burgess, Harriet. 2015. “The Market Overt Rule: A Time for Reform?” Irish Jurist 53: 154–61.Google Scholar
Calvani, Sandro. 2008. “Frequency and Figures of Organised Crime in Art and Antiquities.” Paper presented at the ISPAC International Conference, 12 December, http://www.sandrocalvani.it/docs/20081221_Speeches_081212.pdf (accessed 7 November 2017).Google Scholar
Davenport, Brian, QC, and Ross, Anthony. 1993. “Market Overt.” International Journal of Cultural Property 2, no. 1: 25–46.Google Scholar
Du Cros, Hilary, and McKercher, Bob. 2002. Cultural Tourism: The Partnership between Tourism and Cultural Heritage Management. New York: Haworth Hospitality Press.Google Scholar
He, Shuzhong. 2000. “Protection of China’s Cultural Heritage.” Journal of Art, Antiquity and the Law 5: 19–30.Google Scholar
Howells, Geraint. 1995. Consumer Contract Legislation-Understanding the New Law. London: Blackstone.Google Scholar
Loi, Kelry C. F. 2009. “The Market Overt Rule: Rationale, Reform and Reconsideration.” Hong Kong Law Journal 39, no. 3: 835–60.Google Scholar
MacDougall, Bruce. 2009. “The Market Overt Method to Obtain Ownership of Lost or Stolen Goods: Comment on Manning v Algard Estate [2008] BSCS 1129.” International Journal of Cultural Property 16, no. 1: 85–93.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, Simon, and Davis, Tess. 2016. “Temple Looting in Cambodia: Anatomy of a Statue Trafficking Network.” In Art Crime: Terrorists, Tomb Raiders, Forgers and Thieves, edited by Charney, Noah, 179–99. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Mautner, Menachem. 1991. “’The Eternal Triangles of the Law’: Toward a Theory of Priorities Involving Remote Parties.” Michigan Law Review 90, no. 1: 95–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, J. David. 1993. “The People’s Republic of China and the Illicit Trade in Cultural Property: Is the Embargo Approach the Answer?” Asia Pacific Law Review 2, no. 2: 53–69.Google Scholar
Murphy, J. David. 1995. Plunder and Preservation: Cultural Property Law and Practice in the People’s Republic of China. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Murray, Daniel E. 1960. “Sale in Market Overt.” International and Comparative Law Quarterly 9, no. 1: 24–52.Google Scholar
Newell, Phillip. 2008. “The PRC’s Law for the Protection of Cultural Relics.” Art, Antiquity and Law 13, no. 1: 1–58.Google Scholar
Palmer, Norman, and McKendrick, Ewan. 1998. Interests in Goods, 2nd ed. London: Informa Law.Google Scholar
Pease, J. G. 1908. “The Change of the Property in Goods by Sale in Market Overt.” Columbia Law Review 8, no. 5: 375–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pease, J. G. 1915. “Market Overt in the City of London.” Law Quarterly Review 31: 270–88.Google Scholar
Pendergast, D. M. 1991. “And the Loot Goes On: Winning Some Battles, But Not the War.” Journal of Field Archaeology 18: 89–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Emiline C. H. Forthcoming. “Cultural Property in Transit: A Case Study of Hong Kong.” Working thesis, University of Glasgow, Glasgow.Google Scholar
Smith, Peter M. 1997. “Valediction to Market Overt.” American Journal of Legal History 41, no. 2: 225–49.Google Scholar
So, Jenny F. 2000. “Cultural Property: Owner’s Rights and Obligations.” Hong Kong Visual Arts Yearbook 2000: 10–19.Google Scholar
Taylor, Jason M. 2006. “The Rape and Return of China’s Cultural Property: How Can Bilateral Agreements Stem the Bleeding of China’s Cultural Heritage in a Flawed System?” Loyola University Chicago International Law Review 3, no. 2: 233–55.Google Scholar
Wang, Audrey. 2012. Chinese Antiquities: An Introduction to the Art Market. Farnham: Lund Humphries, in association with Sotheby’s Institute of Art.Google Scholar
Wang, Yi, and Bramwell, Bill. 2012. “Heritage Protection and Tourism Development Priorities in Hangzhou, China: A Political Economy and Governance Perspective.” Tourism Management 33, no. 4: 988–98.Google Scholar
Weinberg, Harold R. 1981. “Market Overt, Voidable Titles, and Feckless Agents: Judges and Efficiency in the Antebellum Doctrine of Good Faith Purchase.” Tulane Law Review 56, no. 1: 1–41.Google Scholar