Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T19:54:27.872Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Copyrighting Culture for the Nation? Intangible Property Nationalism and the Regional Arts of Indonesia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2012

Lorraine V. Aragon*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Email: [email protected]

Abstract

This article analyzes how intangible cultural expressions are re-scripted as national intellectual and cultural property in postcolonial nations such as Indonesia. The mixing of intellectual and cultural property paradigms to frame folkloric art practices as national possessions, termed “intangible property nationalism,” is assessed through consideration of Indonesia's 2002 copyright law, UNESCO heritage discourse, and the tutoring of ASEAN officials to use intellectual and cultural property rhetoric to defend national cultural resources. The article considers how legal assumptions are rebuffed by Indonesian regional artists and artisans who do not view their local knowledge and practices as property subject to exclusive claims by individuals or corporate groups, including the state. Producers' limited claims on authority over cultural expressions such as music, drama, puppetry, mythology, dance, and textiles contrast with Indonesian officials' anxieties over cultural theft by foreigners, especially in Malaysia. The case suggests new nationalist uses for heritage claims in postcolonial states.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Cultural Property Society 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acciaioli, Gregory L.Culture as Art: From Practice to Spectacle in Indonesia.” Canberra Anthropology 8 (1985): 148–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Benedict. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso, 1991.Google Scholar
Anderson, Jane E.The Making of Indigenous Knowledge in Intellectual Property Law in Australia.” International Journal of Cultural Property 12 (2005): 345–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Jane E.Law, Knowledge, Culture: The Production of Indigenous Knowledge in Intellectual Property Law. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Jane E.“Indigenous/Traditional Knowledge and Intellectual Property.” 2010 Issues Paper, Duke University School of Law and Center for the Study of the Public Domain. http://web.law.duke.edu/cspd/pdf/ip_indigenous-traditionalknowledge.pdfGoogle Scholar
Aragon, Lorraine V.Barkcloth Production in Central Sulawesi: A Vanishing Textile Technology in Outer Island Indonesia.” Expedition 32 (1990): 3348.Google Scholar
Aragon, Lorraine V.Suppressed and Revised Performances: Raego' Songs of Central Sulawesi.” Ethnomusicology 40 (1996): 413–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aragon, Lorraine V.The Currency of Indonesian Regional Textiles: Aesthetic Politics in Local, Transnational and International Emblems.” Ethnos 64 (1999): 151–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aragon, Lorraine V.Fields of the Lord: Animism, Christian Minorities, and State Development in Indonesia. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Aragon, Lorraine V.Where Commons Meet Commerce: Circulation and Sequestration Strategies in Indonesian Arts Economies.” Anthropology of Work Review 32 (2011): 6376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aragon, Lorraine V., and Leach, James. “Arts and Owners: Intellectual Property Law and the Politics of Scale in Indonesian Arts.” American Ethnologist 35 (2008): 607–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biagioli, Mario. “Patent Republic: Representing Inventions, Constructing Rights and Authors.” Social Research 73 (2006): 1129–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, Janet. Commentary on the 2003 UNESCO Convention on the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage. Leicester [England]: Institute of Art and Law, 2006.Google Scholar
Boateng, Boatema. The Copyright Thing Doesn't Work Here: Adinkra and Kente Cloth and Intellectual Property in Ghana. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, James. Shamans, Software, and Spleens: Law and the Construction of the Information Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, James. The Public Domain: Enclosing the Commons of the Mind. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Brown, Michael F.Can Culture Be Copyrighted?Current Anthropology 39 (1998): 193206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Michael F.Who Owns Native Culture? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Brown, Michael F.Heritage Trouble: Recent Work on the Protection of Intangible Cultural Property.” International Journal of Cultural Property 12 (2005): 4061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budi, Henry Soelistyo. “I La Galigo: Simulasi Sebuah Kebijakan Eksploitasi Ranah Publik yang Diabaikan” [I La Galigo: A policy exploiting a neglected public domain]. In HAKI dan Aset Kultural: Kontrol atas Seni Pertunjukan Tantangan Revitalisasi Seni [Intellectual property rights and cultural assets: Control over art performances challenging arts revitalization]. Special issue, Jurnal Seni Pertunjukan Indonesia 13 (2005): 1431.Google Scholar
Chakrabarty, Dipesh. Provincializing Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Chan, Anita Say. “Competitive Tradition: Intellectual Property and New Millennial Craft.” Anthropology of Work Review 32 (2011): 90102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clifford, James. The Predicament of Culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Cohen, Mathew Isaac. “I La Galigo.” Asian Theatre Journal 22 (2005): 138–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comaroff, John L., and Comaroff, Jean. Ethnicity, Inc. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coombe, Rosemary J.The Cultural Life of Intellectual Properties: Authorship, Appropriation, and the Law. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Davidson, Jamie S., and Henley, David, eds. The Revival of Tradition in Indonesian Politics: The Deployment of Adat from Colonialism to Indigenism. London: Routledge, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Obaldia, Irma. “Western Intellectual Property and Indigenous Cultures: The Case of Panamanian Indigenous Intellectual Property Law.” Boston University International Law Journal 23 (2005): 337–93.Google Scholar
Drahos, Peter, Braithwaite, with John. Information Feudalism: Who Owns the Knowledge Economy? New York: New Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Drahos, Peter, and Mayne, Ruth. Global Intellectual Property Rights: Knowledge, Access, and Development. New York: Oxfam, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Michael F.Culture and Cultural Analysis as Experimental Systems.” Cultural Anthropology 22 (2007): 165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forrest, Craig. International Law and the Protection of Cultural Heritage. London/New York: Routledge, 2010.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. “What Is an Author?” In Textual Strategies: Perspectives in Post-Structuralist Criticism, edited by Harari, Josué V., 141–60. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Geismar, Haidy. “Reproduction, Creativity, Restriction: Material Culture and Copyright in Vanuatu.” Journal of Social Archaeology 5 (2005): 2551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallowell, A. Irving. “The Nature and Function of Property as a Social Institution.” In Culture and Experience, 236–49. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1955. First published 1943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Handler, Richard. “Who Owns the Past? History, Cultural Property, and the Logic of Possessive Individualism.” In The Politics of Culture, edited by Williams, Brett, 6374. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Handler, Richard, and Linnekin, Jocelyn. “Tradition, Genuine or Spurious.” Journal of American Folklore 97 (1984): 273–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hann, C. M.Introduction: The Embeddedness of Property.” In Property Relations: Renewing the Anthropological Tradition, edited by M, C.. Hann. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Helfer, Laurence R., and Austin, Graeme W.. Human Rights and Intellectual Property: Mapping the Global Interface. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes-Freeland, Felicia. Embodied Communities: Dance Traditions and Change in Java. Oxford: Berghahn, 2008.Google Scholar
Humphrey, Caroline, and Verdery, Katherine. “Introduction: Raising Questions about Property.” In Property in Question: Value Transformation in the Global Economy, edited by Verdery, Katherine and Humphrey, Caroline, 125. Oxford: Berg, 2004.Google Scholar
Jaszi, Peter. “Traditional Culture: A Step Forward for Protection in Indonesia.” American University Washington College of Law Research Paper No. 2010-16. (May 2010) ⟨http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1617245⟩.Google Scholar
Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, Barbara. “Intangible Heritage as Metacultural Production.” Museum International 56 (2004): 5265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knobloch, Charles, and Reni, Dewi Savitri. “Using Batikmark as a First Step to Extend Protection of Indonesian Javanese-batik Patterned Textile in Foreign Countries.” (2009) ⟨www.usptclaw.com/pdfs/Batikmark_Article.pdfGoogle Scholar
Koolhof, Sirtjo. “The ‘La Galigo’: A Bugis Encyclopedia and Its Growth.” In La Galigo: Menelusuri Jejak Warisan Sastra Dunia, edited by Rahman, Nurhayati, Hukma, Anil, and Anwar, Idwar, 433. Makassar: Hasanuddin University, 2003.Google Scholar
Lansing, J. Stephen. The Balinese. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace, 1995.Google Scholar
Lessig, Lawrence. Free Culture: The Nature and Future of Creativity. New York: Penguin, 2004.Google Scholar
Lowenthal, David. Possessed by the Past: The Heritage Crusade and the Spoils of History. New York: Free Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Mauss, Marcel. The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies. Translated by Halls, W. D.. New York: Norton, 1990.Google Scholar
May, Christopher, and Sell, Susan K.. Intellectual Property Rights: A Critical History. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 2006.Google Scholar
McGraw, Andrew Clay. “The Political Economy of the Performing Arts in Contemporary Bali.” Indonesia and the Malay World 37 (2009): 299325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLeod, Kembrew. Owning Culture: Authorship, Ownership, and Intellectual Property Law. New York: Peter Lang, 2001.Google Scholar
Merryman, John Henry. “Two Ways of Thinking about Cultural Property.” American Journal of International Law 80 (1986): 831–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merryman, John Henry. “Cultural Property Internationalism.” International Journal of Cultural Property 12 (2005): 1139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, Fred. “Ontologies of the Image and Economies of Exchange.” American Ethnologist 31 (2004): 521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perlman, Marc. “From Folklore to Knowledge in Global Governance: On the Metamorphoses of the Unauthored.” In Making and Unmaking Intellectual Property, edited by Woodmansee, Martha, Jaszi, Peter, and Biagioli, Mario. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Posey, Darrell A., and Dutfield, Graham. Beyond Intellectual Property: Toward Traditional Resource Rights for Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities. Ottawa, Canada: International Development Research Centre, 1996.Google Scholar
Sardjono, Agus. Hak Kekayaan Intelektual dan Pengetahuan Tradisional [Intellectual property rights and traditional knowledge]. Bandung, Indonesia: P.T. Alumni, 2006.Google Scholar
Sedyawati, Edi. Budaya Indonesia: Kajian Arkeologi, Seni, dan Sejarah [Indonesian culture: Archaeological, art, and historical investigations]. Jakarta: P.T. RajaGrafindo Persada, 2010.Google Scholar
Shiva, Vandana. Protect or Plunder? Understanding Intellectual Property Rights. London: Zed Books, 2001.Google ScholarPubMed
Siagian, Rizaldi. Benturan Kepentingan Komunal vs. Kepentingan Individual: Tinjuan Pemahan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual dalam Konteks Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional di Indonesia.” [Clash of communal and individual interests: Considering intellectual property rights in the context of traditional cultural expressions in Indonesia]. Paper presented at the Symposium on Traditional Culture and Intellectual Property Rights, 20–21 December 2005 Jakarta, Indonesia.Google Scholar
Stocker, Karen. “Trademarking Indigenous Identity.” Paper presented at the Annual Meetings of the American Anthropological Association, San Francisco, 2008.Google Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn. The Gender of the Gift: Problems with Women and Problems with Society in Melanesia. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn. Property, Substance, and Effect: Anthropological Essays on Persons and Things. London: Athlone Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn. “Transactions: An Analytical Foray.” In Transactions and Creations: Property Debates and the Stimulus of Melanesia, edited by Hirsch, Eric and Strathern, Marilyn, 85109. New York: Berghahn Books, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn. “Intellectual Property and Rights: An Anthropological Perspective.” In Handbook of Material Culture, edited by Tilley, Chris, Keane, Webb, Küchler, Susanne, Rowlands, Mike, and Spyer, Patricia, 447–62. London: Sage, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taubman, Antony. “Review of the WIPO Intergovernmental Committee on IP and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore.” Presentation at the Asia-Africa Forum on Intellectual Property and Traditional Cultural Expressions, Traditional Knowledge, and Genetic Resources, Bandung, Indonesia, 18 June 2007.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. Modern Social Imaginaries. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Paul Michael, and Aragon, Lorraine V.. Beyond the Java Sea: Art of Indonesia's Outer Islands. Washington, DC: National Museum of Natural History, 1991.Google Scholar
UNESCO. Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict with Regulations for the Execution of the Convention, The Hague, 14 May 1954.Google Scholar
UNESCO. Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict with Regulations for the Execution of the Convention, The Hague. Convention on the Means of Prohibiting, and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property, Paris, 14 November 1970.Google Scholar
UNESCO. Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict with Regulations for the Execution of the Convention, The Hague. Convention on the Means of Prohibiting. Universal Declaration on Cultural Diversity. Adopted by the 31st Session of the General Conference of UNESCO, Paris, 2 November 2001.Google Scholar
UNESCO. Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict with Regulations for the Execution of the Convention, The Hague. Convention on the Means of Prohibiting. Universal Declaration on Cultural Diversity. Adopted by the 31st Session of the General Conference of UNESCO. Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage. Paris, 17 October 2003.Google Scholar
UNESCO. Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict with Regulations for the Execution of the Convention, The Hague. Convention on the Means of Prohibiting. Universal Declaration on Cultural Diversity. Adopted by the 31st Session of the General Conference of UNESCO. Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage. Paris. Convention on the Protection, and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions, 2005.Google Scholar
UNESCO. Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict with Regulations for the Execution of the Convention, The Hague. Convention on the Means of Prohibiting. Universal Declaration on Cultural Diversity. Adopted by the 31st Session of the General Conference of UNESCO. Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage. Paris. Convention on the Protection. Representative List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity, 2009.Google Scholar
UNESCO, and World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). “Model Provisions for National Laws on the Protection of Expressions of Folklore Against Illicit Exploitation and Other Prejudicial Actions.” Paris and Geneva, 1985.Google Scholar
Verdery, Katherine, and Humphrey, Caroline, eds. Property in Question: Value Transformation in the Global Economy. Oxford: Berg, 2004.Google Scholar
Weiss, Sarah. “Permeable Boundaries: Hybridity, Music, and the Reception of Robert Wilson's I La Galigo.” Ethnomusicology 52 (2008): 203–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WIPO. “Records of the Intellectual Property Conference of Stockholm, June 11–14, 1967,” Geneva, 1971.Google Scholar
WIPO. “Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore (Eighteenth Session, Geneva, 9–11 May 2011): The Protection of Traditional Cultural Expressions: Draft Articles.” WIPO Document WIPO/GRTKF/IC/18/4.Google Scholar
Wolf, Eric. Europe and the People without History. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Woodmansee, Martha, and Jaszi, Peter, eds. The Construction of Authorship: Textual Appropriation in Law and Literature. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Yampolsky, Philip. “Forces for Change in the Regional Performing Arts of Indonesia.” Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde 151 (1995): 700–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar