Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T18:49:35.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Conflict of Laws and the Return of Indigenous Peoples’ Cultural Property: A Latin American Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2019

María Julia Ochoa Jiménez
María Julia Ochoa Jiménez*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, University of Antioquia, Medellin, Colombia; Email: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

In Latin America, conflict-of-law norms have not appropriately considered the cultural diversity that exists in their legal systems. However, developments towards the recognition of Indigenous peoples’ human rights, at the international and national levels, impose the task of considering such diversity. In that regard, within the conflict-of-law realm, interpersonal law offers a useful perspective. This article proposes a conflict-of-law rule that can contribute to clarity and legal certainty, offering a sound way of dealing at the national level with Indigenous peoples’ claims for restitution of property with a cultural value for them, which is framed in international instruments on human rights.

Type
Article
Information
International Journal of Cultural Property , Volume 26 , Issue 4 , November 2019 , pp. 437 - 456
Copyright
Copyright © International Cultural Property Society 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Bello, Andrés. 1873. Principios del Derecho Internacional. 3rd ed. Paris: Garnier.Google Scholar
Benítez, Naranjo, Darío, Hernán. 2002. “La Corte Constitucional ¿Juez Penal? El Caso de la Jurisdicción Especial Indígena.” Opinión Jurídica 1, no. 2: 51–58.Google Scholar
Bleckmann, Albert. 1974. “Sittenwidrigkeit wegen Verstoßes gegen den ordre public international: Anmerkung zum Urteil des BGH vom 22. Juni 1972.” Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 34: 112–32.Google Scholar
Boparai, Harinder. 1985. “Reviewed Work(s): International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law, Vol. III (Private International Law), Chapter 10: Interpersonal Conflict of Laws by Kurt Lipstein and Istvan Szaszy.” American Journal of Comparative Law 36, no. 4: 783–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvo, Caravaca, Luis, Alfonso, and González, Javier Carrascosa. 2015. Derecho Internacional Privado. 2 volumes. Madrid: Comares.Google Scholar
Carruthers, Janeen. 2005. The Transfer of Property in the Conflict of Laws: Choice of Law Rules Concerning Inter Vivos Transfers of Property. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Consejo Superior de la Judicatura. 2006. Compilación y Selección de Fallos y Decisiones de la Jurisdicción Especial Indígena. 1980–2006. Bogota: Centro de Documentación Judicial.Google Scholar
Figuera Vargas, Sorily. 2011. “La Jurisdicción Especial Indígena y su Reconocimiento en el Sistema Jurídico Español.” PhD dissertation, Universidad de Salamanca. https://gredos.usal.es/jspui/bitstream/10366/108961/1/DDAFP_Figuera_Vargas_SC_LaJurisdicciónEspecial.pdf (accessed 30 September 2019).Google Scholar
Figuera Vargas, Sorily, and Lascarro, Andrea Ariza. 2015. “Derecho a la Autodeterminación de los Pueblos Indígenas en el Ordenamiento Jurídico Colombiano.” Revista de Estudios Sociales 53: 65–76.Google Scholar
Fincham, Derek. 2008. “How Adopting the Lex Originis Rule Can Impede the Flow of Illicit Cultural Property.” Columbia Journal of Law and the Arts 32: 111–50.Google Scholar
Gallala-Arndt, Imen, and Winkel, Laurens. 2017. “Interreligious Law.” In Encyclopedia of Private International Law, edited by Basedow, J., Rühl, G., Ferrari, F., and Asensio, P. M., 1020–26. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gouw Giok, Siong. 1965. “Interpersonal Law in Indonesia.” Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 29: 547–72.Google Scholar
Jayme, Erik. 1990. “Internationaler Kulturgüterschutz: Lex originis oder lex rei sitae: Tagung in Heidelberg.” Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts 5: 347–48.Google Scholar
Jayme, Erik. 1991. Kunstwerk und Nation: Zuordnungsprobleme im internationalen Kulturgüterschutz. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Jayme, Erik. 1994. “Neue Anknüpfungsmaximen für den Kulturgüterschutz im internationalen Privatrecht.” In Rechtsfragen des internationalen Kulturgiiterschutzes: Symposium vom 22./23. Juni 1990 im Internationalen Wissenschaftsforum Heidelberg, edited by Dolzer, R., Jayme, E., and Mußgnug, R., 35–52. Heildelberg: C. F. Müller.Google Scholar
Jayme, Erik. 1999. Nationales Kunstwerk und Internationales Privatrecht. Vorträge—Aufsätze—Gutachten. Heidelberg: C. F. Müller.Google Scholar
Jayme, Erik. 2019. “Die Rechtsstellung indigener Völker in Kulturgutverfahren vor deutschen Gerichten.” Symposium Universität Tübingen. Politisches Kollisionsrecht—Sachnormenzwecke, Hoheitsinteressen, Kultur, University of Tübingen, 7–8 June 2019.Google Scholar
Kuprecht, Karolina. 2010. “Human Rights Aspects of Indigenous Cultural Property Repatriation.” In Kulturgüterschutz – Kunstrecht – Kulturrecht, edited by Odendahl, K. and Weber, P., 191–227. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlag.Google Scholar
Kurpiers, Olaf Rafael. 2005. Die lex originis-Regel im internationalen Sachenrecht—Grenzüberschreitende privatrechtliche Ansprüche auf Herausgabe von abhanden gekommenen und unrechtmässig ausgeführten Kulturgütern. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Lipstein, Kurt, and Szászy, István. 2011. “Interpersonal Conflict of Laws.” In International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law, edited by Lipstein, K., 1–35. Vol. 3. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Lira Urquieta, Pedro. 1981. “Código Civil de la República de Chile. Introducción.” In Obras Completas de Andrés Bello, edited by Ministerio de Educación, xiii–lxii. 2nd ed. Caracas: Ministerio de Educación.Google Scholar
Maekelt, Tatiana. 2005. Ley de Derecho Internacional Privado Comentada. Caracas: Universidad Central de Venezuela.Google Scholar
Maekelt, Tatiana, Hernández-Bretón, Eugenio, and Madrid, Claudia. 2015. Ley de Derecho Internacional Privado: Derogatorias y Concordancias. Caracas: Academia de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales.Google Scholar
Merryman, John Henry. 1989. “The Public Interest in Cultural Property.” California Law Review 77: 339–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rauscher, Thomas. 2017. Internationales Privatrecht. 5th ed. Heidelberg: C. F. Müller.Google Scholar
Reichelt, Gerte. 1989. “Kulturgüterschutz und Internationales Verfahrenerecht.” Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts 4: 254–55.Google Scholar
Roodt, Christa. 2015. Private International Law, Art and Cultural Heritage. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samtleben, Jürgen. 1982. “La relación entre derecho internacional público y privado en Andrés Bello.” Jurídica Anuario del Departamento de Derecho de la Universidad Iberoamericana 14: 167–74.Google Scholar
Samtleben, Jürgen. 2010a. “Territorialitätsgrundsatz im Internationalen Privatrecht Lateinamerikas (1971).” In Rechtspraxis und Rechtskultur in Brasilien und Lateinamerika, edited by Samtleben, J., 345–69. Aachen, Germany: Shaker Verlag.Google Scholar
Samtleben, Jürgen. 2010b. “El principio de territorialidad en América Latina (1977).” In Rechtspraxis und Rechtskultur in Brasilien und Lateinamerika, edited by Samtleben, J., 370–403. Aachen, Germany: Shaker Verlag.Google Scholar
Sarr, Felwine, and Savoy, Bénédicte. 2018. The Restitution of African Cultural Heritage: Toward a New Relational Ethics, report. Paris: Ministère de la Culture.Google Scholar
Schiller, Arthur. 1962. “Conflict of Laws in East Africa.” In De Conflictum Legum, edited by Kollewijn, R. and Offerhaus, J., 430–54. Leiden: A. W. Sijthoff.Google Scholar
Siehr, Kurt. 1994.“Öffentliches Recht und internationales Privatrecht bei Grenzüberschreitenden Kultugüterschutz.” In Rechtsfragen des internationalen Kulturgiiterschutzes: Symposium vom 22./23. Juni 1990 im Internationalen Wissenschaftsforum Heidelberg, edited by Dolzer, R., Jayme, E., and Mußgnug, R., 83–104. Heidelberg: C. F. Müller.Google Scholar
Symeonides, Symeon. 2001. “Material Justice and Conflicts Justice in Choice of Law: International Conflict of Laws for the Third Millennium.” In Essays in Honor of Friedrich K. Juenger, edited by Borchers, P. and Zekoll, J., 125–40. Ardsley, UK: Transnational Publishers.Google Scholar
Symeonides, Symeon. 2005. “A Choice of Law Rule for Conflicts Involving Stolen Cultural Property.” Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 38: 1177–98.Google Scholar
Symeonides, Symeon. 2016. Choice of Law. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tier, Akolda. 1976. “The Relationship between Conflict of Personal Laws and Private International Law.” Journal of the Indian Law Institute 18, no. 2: 241–78.Google Scholar