Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T22:47:16.313Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Case note. The native American graves protection and repatriation act: a benefit and a burden, refining NAGPRA's cultural patrimony definition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2005

DE Goldman
DE Goldman
Affiliation:
University of California Davis School of Law 1999, Davis, CA, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This note discusses the United States v. Corrow decision. It focuses on the interpretation of cultural patrimony as defined by NAGPRA and emphasizes the dangers presented by this vague definition. The court in United States v. Corrow was the first to address whether the statute is unconstitutional because it is vague. This case is the first and only authority on NAGPRA's definition of cultural patrimony; therefore, the case and this note present significant avenues to understanding and thinking about cultural patrimony.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Journal of Cultural Property , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , January 1999 , pp. 229 - 244
Copyright
© The International Cultural Property Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)