We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Kingdom Affairs Adviser, Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Kingdom of the Netherlands, Ph.D. in International Art Law. The co-author prepared his portion of this commentary in his personal capacity. E-mail: [email protected]
James A. R. Nafziger
Affiliation:
Thomas B. Stoel Professor of Law and Director of International Programs, Willamette University College of Law (USA); Chair, Cultural Heritage Law Committee, International Law Association. E-mail: [email protected]
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Frigo, Manlio. “Protection of Cultural Property on Loan—Anti-Seizure and State Immunity Laws: An Italian Perspective.” Art Antiquity and Law14, no. 1 (April 2009): 49–62.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Laura. “Senate Fails to End Loans Cold War.” Art Newspaper (February 2013): 4.Google Scholar
International Law Association. “Principles for Cooperation in the Mutual Protection and Transfer of Cultural Material.” Report of the Seventy-Second Conference (2006) 338 et seq.Google Scholar
International Law Association. Report of the Seventy-Fifth Conference (2012): 223, 233.Google Scholar
Kaye, Lawrence M. “Recovery of Art Looted During the Holocaust.” In Cultural Heritage Issues: The Legacy of Conquest, Colonization, and Commerce, edited by Nafziger, James A. R. and Nicgorski, Ann M.. 2009: 351, 365.Google Scholar
Van Woudenberg, Nout. State Immunity and Cultural Objects on Loan. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar