Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T21:02:12.335Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cultural Property, the Palermo Convention, and Transnational Organized Crime

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 December 2014

Greg Borgstede
Greg Borgstede*
Affiliation:
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

The international community is concerned about criminal activity involving cultural property and is promoting the use of the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime to combat looting and trafficking of cultural property. This article discusses how the Convention may be applied, outlines some of the intentions of UN member states with regard to cultural property crime, and the role of the UN Office on Drugs and Crime. It is suggested that cultural property stakeholders should scrutinize this developing effort, particularly in the areas of UNTOC application to specific cultural property cases and the collection and analysis of data specifically to address the connections between cultural property and transnational organized crime.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Journal of Cultural Property , Volume 21 , Issue 3: SPECIAL ISSUE: Thinking About Cultural Property: The Legal and Public Policy Legacies of John Henry Merryman , August 2014 , pp. 281 - 290
Copyright
Copyright © International Cultural Property Society 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Betti, Stefano. “New Prospects for Inter-State Cooperation in Criminal Matters: The Palermo Convention.” International Criminal Law Review 3, no. 2 (2003): 151–67.Google Scholar
Dietzler, Jessica. “On ‘Organized Crime’ in the Illicit Antiquities Trade: Moving Beyond the Definitional Debate.” Trends in Organized Crime 16, no. 3 (2013): 329–42.Google Scholar
Durney, Mark. “Reevaluating Art Crime’s Famous Figures.” International Journal of Cultural Property 20 (2013): 221–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finckenauer, James O. “Problems of Definition: What Is Organized Crime?” Trends in Organized Crime 8, no. 3 (2005): 63–83.Google Scholar
Schloenhardt, Andreas. “Transnational Organised Crime and International Law: The Palermo Convention.” Criminal Law Journal 29 (2005): 340–54.Google Scholar
Shyllon, Folarin. “Extraordinary Meeting of States Parties to the Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property.” International Journal of Cultural Property 20 (2013): 499–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Standing, André. Transnational Organized Crime and the Palermo Convention: A Reality Check. New York: International Peace Institute, 2010.Google Scholar
UNESCO. Convention for the Fight against the Illicit Trafficking of Cultural Property. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0019/001916/191606E.pdf (15 and 16 March 2011).Google Scholar
United Nations. Report of the Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime, Fifth Session, Vienna, 18 to 22 October 2010. http://www.unodc.org/documents/treaties/organized_crime/COP5/CTOC_COP_2010_17/CTOC_COP_2010_17_E.pdf (2 December 2010).Google Scholar
United Nations. Use of the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime for Protection against Trafficking in Cultural Property: Note by the Secretariat. CTOC/COP/2010/12. https://www.unodc.org/documents/treaties/organized_crime/COP5/CTOC_COP_2010_12x/CTOC_COP_2010_12x_E.pdf (13 August 2010).Google Scholar
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime and the Protocols Thereto. http://www.unodc.org/documents/treaties/UNTOC/Publications/TOC%20Convention/TOCebook-e.pdf (2004).Google Scholar