Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T13:25:50.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Uses of wonder in popular science: Cosmos: A Personal Voyage and the origin of life

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 April 2016

Daniel Helsing
Daniel Helsing*
Affiliation:
The Centre for Languages and Literature, Lund University, 22100 Lund, Sweden
*
e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper analyses the use of wonder in the TV-series Cosmos: A Personal Voyage (1980). Popular science has been studied extensively (e.g. Broks 2006; Leane 2007; Perrault 2013), and wonder has been studied moderately (e.g. Daston & Park 1998; Fuller 2006; Vasalou 2015). However, there are very few studies of wonder in popular science. This paper explores how and why wonder is used in Cosmos, with the wider aim of understanding uses of wonder in popular science. The studies that discuss wonder in popular science (Fahnestock 1986; Perrault 2013) argue that wonder is used to enthuse the audience about science, but they do not discuss why wonder has this ability, nor whether wonder has other functions. This paper argues that Fuller's (2006) psychological and evolutionary account of wonder can elucidate why wonder has the ability to enthuse; it discerns three senses of ‘wonder’ (related to objects, emotions and attitudes); and it discusses other functions of wonder (existential, aesthetic and ethical). Due to the centrality of astrobiological questions in Cosmos, this paper also highlights the relation of these questions to the senses and functions of wonder in Cosmos.

Keywords

Carl SaganCosmospopular sciencewonder
Type
Research Article
Information
International Journal of Astrobiology , Volume 15 , Special Issue 4: The history and philosophy of the Origin of Life , October 2016 , pp. 271 - 276
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aristotle (2004). The Metaphysics, tr. Hugh Lawson-Tancred. Penguin Books, London.Google Scholar
Atran, S. (2002). In Gods We Trust: The Evolutionary Landscape of Religion. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Boyd, B. (2009). On the Origin of Stories: Evolution, Cognition, and Fiction. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Boyer, P. (2002). Religion Explained: The Human Instincts that Fashion Gods, Spirits and Ancestors. Vintage, London.Google Scholar
Broks, P. (2006). Understanding Popular Science. Open University Press, Maidenhead.Google Scholar
Campbell, M.B. (1999). Wonder and Science: Imagining Worlds in Early Modern Europe. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Carroll, J., Clasen, M., Jonsson, E., Kratschmer, A.R., McKerracher, L., Riede, F., Svenning, J.-C. & Kjærgaard, P.C. (2015). October 12 biocultural theory: the current state of knowledge. Evol. Behav. Sci. Advance online publication.Google Scholar
Dahlstrom, M. (2014). Using narratives and storytelling to communicate science with nonexpert audiences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 111(37), 13614–13620.Google Scholar
Daston, L. & Park, K. (1998). Wonders and the Order of Nature: 1150–1750. Zone Books, New York.Google Scholar
Davidson, K. (1999). Carl Sagan: A Life. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Dick, S.J. (2004). The Living Universe: NASA and the Development of Astrobiology. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ.Google Scholar
Edford, R. (2007). The elegance of The Elegant Universe: unity, beauty, and harmony in brian Greene's popularization of superstring theory. Public Underst. Sci. 16(4), 441–454.Google Scholar
Evans, R.J.W. & Marr, A. (eds) (2006). Curiosity and Wonder from the Renaissance to the Enlightenment. Ashgate, Aldershot.Google Scholar
Fahnestock, J. (1986). Accommodating science: the rhetorical life of scientific facts. Written Commun. 3(3), 275–296.Google Scholar
Fahy, D. (2015). The New Celebrity Scientists: Out of the Lab and into the Limelight. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Lanham, MD.Google Scholar
Feynman, R.P. (1999). The Pleasure of Finding Things Out: The Best Short Works of Richard P. Feynman. Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
Fisher, P. (1998). Wonder, the Rainbow, and the Aesthetics of Rare Experiences. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Fuller, R. (2006). Wonder: From Emotion to Spirituality. The University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC.Google Scholar
Gärdenfors, P. (2003). How Homo Became Sapiens: On the Evolution of Thinking. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Greenblatt, S. (1991). Marvellous Possessions: The Wonder of the New World. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Greene, B. (2005). The Fabric of the Cosmos: Space, Time, and the Texture of Reality. Vintage Books, New York.Google Scholar
Gregory, J. & Miller, S. (1998). Science in Public: Communication, Culture, and Credibility. Plenum Trade, New York.Google Scholar
Haidt, J. (2013). The Righteous Mind: Why Good People are Divided by Politics and Religion. Vintage Books, New York.Google Scholar
Hepburn, R.W. (1984). “Wonder” and Other Essays: Eight Studies in Aesthetics and Neighbouring Fields. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Leane, E. (2007). Reading Popular Physics: Disciplinary Skirmishes and Textual Strategies. Ashgate, Burlington.Google Scholar
Lessl, T. (1985). Science and the sacred cosmos: the ideological rhetoric of Carl Sagan. Quat. J. Speech 71(2), 175–187.Google Scholar
Locke, S. (2011). Re-crafting Rationalization: Enchanted Science and Mundane Mysteries. Ashgate, Farnham.Google Scholar
Mellor, F. (2003). Between fact and fiction: demarcating science from non-science in popular physics books. Soc. Stud. Sci. 33(4), 509–538.Google Scholar
Muurlink, O. & McAllister, P. (2015). Narrative risks in science writing for the lay public. J. Sci. Commun. 14(3) A01:1–17.Google Scholar
Nadis, F. (2005). Wonder Shows: Performing Science, Magic, and Religion in America. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ.Google Scholar
Nightingale, A.W. (2004). Spectacles of Truth in Classical Greek Philosophy: Theoria in its Cultural Context. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Perrault, S.T. (2013). Communicating Popular Science: From Deficit to Democracy. Palgrave Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Plato (1977). Theaetetus, tr.: Harold North Fowler. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Poundstone, W. (1999). Carl Sagan: A Life in the Cosmos. Henry Holt and Co, New York.Google Scholar
Randall, L. (2011). Knocking on Heaven's Door: How Physics and Scientific Thinking Illuminate the Universe and the Modern World. HarperCollins, New York.Google Scholar
Rubenstein, M.-J. (2008). Strange Wonder: The Closure of Metaphysics and the Opening of Awe. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Sagan, C. et al. (2009). Cosmos: A Personal Voyage. Cosmos Studios (DVD).Google Scholar
Tegmark, M. (2014). Our Mathematical Universe: My Quest for the Ultimate Nature of Reality. Alfred A. Knopf, New York.Google Scholar
Thompson, C. (2011). Travel Writing. Routledge, New York.Google Scholar
Turney, J. (2004). The abstract sublime: life as information waiting to be rewritten. Sci. Cult. 13(1), 89–103.Google Scholar
Vasalou, S. (ed.) (2012a). Practices of Wonder: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives. Pickwick Publications, Eugene.Google Scholar
Vasalou, S. (2012b). Wonder: toward a grammar. In Practices of Wonder: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives, ed. Vasalou, S., pp. 16–63, Pickwick Publications, Eugene.Google Scholar
Vasalou, S. (2015). Wonder: A Grammar. Suny Press, Albany, NY.Google Scholar
Weinberg, S. (1977). The First Three Minutes: A Modern View of the Origin of the Universe. Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar