Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T05:31:52.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Tree-ring dating of meteorite fall in Sikhote-Alin, Eastern Siberia – Russia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 October 2011

R. Fantucci
Affiliation:
Geologi Associati Fantucci e Stocchi, 01027 Montefiascone (VT), Italy e-mail: [email protected]
Mario Di Martino
Affiliation:
INAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Torino, 10025 Pino Torinese, Italy
Romano Serra
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Bologna, via Irnerio 46, 40126 Bologna, Italy

Abstract

This research deals with the fall of the Sikhote-Alin iron meteorite on the morning of 12 February 1947, at about 00:38 h Utrecht, in a remote area in the territory of Primorsky Krai in Eastern Siberia (46°09′36″N, 134°39′22″E). The area engulfed by the meteoritic fall was around 48 km2, with an elliptic form and thousands of craters. Around the large craters the trees were torn out by the roots and laid radially to the craters at a distance of 10–20 m; the more distant trees had broken tops. This research investigated through dendrocronology n.6 Scots pine trees (Pinus Sibirica) close to one of the main impact craters. The analysis of growth anomalies has shown a sudden decrease since 1947 for 4–8 years after the meteoritic impact. Tree growth stress, detected in 1947, was analysed in detail through wood microsection that confirmed the winter season (rest vegetative period) of the event. The growth stress is mainly due to the lost crown (needle lost) and it did not seem to be caused due to direct damages on trunk and branches (missing of resin ducts).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alestalo, J. (1971). Dendrochronological interpretation of geomorphic processes. Fennia 105, 1140.Google Scholar
Baille, M. (2007). The case for significant numbers of the extraterrestrial impacts through the late Holocene. J. Quaternary Sci. 22(2), 101109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Begin, C. & Filion, L. (1988). Age of landslide along the Grande Rivière de la Baleine estuary, Easter coast of Hudson Bay, Québec (Canada). Boreas 17, 289298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Britton, C.E. (1937). A Meteorological Chronology to AD 1450. Geophysical Memoirs No. 70, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Bryant, E. (2001). Tsunami: the Underrated Hazard. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cook, E.R. & Holmes, R.L. (1984). User Manual for ARSTAN. Laboratory of Tree Ring Research, University of Arizona, Tucson.Google Scholar
Fantucci, R. & Sorriso Valvo, M. (1999). Dendrogeomorphological analysis of a slope near Lago, Calabria (Italy). Geomorphology 30(1), 165174.Google Scholar
Fesenkov, V.G. (1959). Sikhotė-Alinskiĭ zheleznyĭ meteoritnyĭ dozhd’. Izd-vo Akademii nauk SSSR. Akademii'a nauk SSSR. Komitet po meteoritam. G. Moskva.Google Scholar
Filion, L., Payette, S. & Gauthier, L. (1986). Light rings in subarctic conifers as dendrochronological tool. Quaternary Res. 26, 272279.Google Scholar
Fritts, H.C. (1976). Tree Rings and Climate. Academic Press, London/Orlando, FL.Google Scholar
Hitoshi, Y. & Chisato, T. (1998). The Tunguska event as recorded in a tree trunk. Proc. 16th 14C Conf., Radiocarbon 40(1), 367371.Google Scholar
Holmes, R.L. (1983). Computer-assisted quality control in tree-ring dating and measurements. Tree-ring Bull. 43, 6978.Google Scholar
Kartavykh, Yu (2002). Variability of tree rings as response to solar cycles and catastrophic events. In Workshop ‘Astrobiology in Russia’, 25–29 March, St Petersburg, Russia.Google Scholar
Kasatkina, E.A., Shumilov, O.I. & Lukina, N.V. (2007). Once more mistery of the Tunguska event? Geophys. Res. Abstr. 9, 04089.Google Scholar
Kasatkina, E.A., Shumilov, O.I. & Lukina, N.V. (2008). Possible reflection of extraterrestrial body impact in tree ring chronologies. Proceedings of “News of Forest History. Eurodendro 2008” ed. Michael, G. and Dieter, E., 39, 5556.Google Scholar
Krinov, E.L. (1971). New studies of the Sikhote-Alin iron meteorite shower. Meteoritics 6, 127138.Google Scholar
Longo, G. & Serra, R. (2006). Effect of the Tunguska explosion on the wood of surviving conifers. In: Fifth International Aerospace Congress, Contribution 16.5, 2731 August, Moscow.Google Scholar
Nesvetailo, V.D. (1998). Consequences of Tunguska catastrophe: dendro-chronoindication inferences. Planet. Space Sci. 46, 155161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schweingruber, F.H., Bräker, O.U. & Schär, E. (1979). Dendroclimatic studies on conifers from central Europe and Great Britain. Boreas 8, 427452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schweingruber, F.H., Eckstein, D., Serre-Bachet, F. & Bräker, O.U. (1990). Identification, presentation and interpretation of event years and pointer years in dendrochronology. Dendrochronologia 8, 938.Google Scholar
Shroder, J.F. (1978). Dendrogeomorphological analysis of mass movement on Table Cliffs Plateau, Utah. Quaternary Res. 9, 168195.Google Scholar
Stoffel, M. (2008). Dating past geomorphic processes with tangential rows of traumatic resin ducts. Dendrochronologia 26(1), 5360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsvetkov, V.I. (1983). Relationship between the fragmentation and distribution of the Sikhote-Alin meteorite shower and the structure of the meteorite. Astronom. Vestnik 17, 122126.Google Scholar
Vaganov, E.A., Hughes, M.K., Silkin, P.P. & Nesvetailo, V.D. (2004). The Tunguska event in 1908: evidence from tree-ring anatomy. Astrobiology 4, 391399.Google Scholar