Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T08:34:25.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sun-driven microbial synthesis of chemicals in space

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 June 2011

Jeffrey C. Way ,
Pamela A. Silver  and
Russell J. Howard
Jeffrey C. Way*
Affiliation:
Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, 3 Blackfan Circle, Boston, MA 02115, USA
Pamela A. Silver
Affiliation:
Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, 3 Blackfan Circle, Boston, MA 02115, USA Department of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Warren Alpert Building, 200 Longwood Ave., Boston, MA 02115, USA
Russell J. Howard
Affiliation:
Oakbio Inc., 265 Sobrante Way Suite T, Sunnyvale, CA 94086, USA
*
e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Long space flights and planetary settlement will require sources of nutrition and chemicals that must be generated in space. This will include not only amino acids and vitamins but also oxygen, all of which can be generated by means of biosynthesis. Synthetic biology has the potential to generate organisms designed for supplying human nutritional needs in space. Photosynthetic microbes may be ideal for this purpose, as they are more efficient per volume cultivated than green plants at conversion of light to chemical energy, biomass and nutritional molecules. In addition, microbes are easier and faster to genetically engineer, facilitating not only design and terrestrial manufacture of organisms optimized for growth and nutrient production in the artificial conditions of space, but superior ability in space to develop organisms suited to newly discovered environments. The rapid ability to adapt and create new microbes to suit new circumstances when in space offers significant potential for risk reduction. Development of sun-driven microbial production of nutritional chemicals would also have terrestrial benefits in commerce and sustainability. A synthetic biology approach to chemical production would not be based on fossil fuels as such fuels do not exist on other planets. This approach would highlight a synergistic relationship between outer space and ‘spaceship earth’, illustrating NASA's role in stimulating technology development with terrestrial application. Two specific approaches deserve consideration: production by traditional photosynthetic microbes, or by the newly appreciated capacity of some bacteria to absorb electric current (e.g. solar panels) to drive metabolism. Palatability and sensory stimulation are a key part of food consumption and could be engineered into microbes. As a first step, NASA should test a bioreactor in which genetically engineered, nutrient-producing photosynthetic bacteria are grown and harvested in space.

Keywords

Photosynthesiscyanobacteriaelectrofuels
Type
Research Article
Information
International Journal of Astrobiology , Volume 10 , Issue 4 , October 2011 , pp. 359 - 364
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Asada, Y., Miyake, M., Miyake, J., Kurane, R. & Tokiwa, Y. (1999). Photosynthetic accumulation of poly-(hydroxybutyrate) by cyanobacteria – the metabolism and potential for CO2 recycling. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 25, 37–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atsumi, S., Higashide, W. & Liao, J.C. (2009). Direct photosynthetic recycling of carbon dioxide to isobutyraldehyde. Nat. Biotechnol. 27, 1177–1180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brenner, M.P., Bildsten, L., Dyson, F., Fortson, N., Garwin, R., Grober, R., Hemley, R., Hwa, T., Joyce, G., Katz, J. et al. (2006). Engineering Microorganisms for Energy Production. US Department of Energy, Washington, DC, Report JSR-05-300.Google Scholar
Carbajosa, S., Malkia, M., Caillard, R., Lopez, M.F., Palomares, F.J., Martín-Gago, J.A., Rodríguez, N., Amils, R., Fernández, V.M. & De Lacey, A.L. (2010). Electrochemical growth of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans on a graphite electrode for obtaining a biocathode for direct electrocatalytic reduction of oxygen. Biosens. Bioelectron. 26, 877–880.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carlozzi, P., Pintucci, C., Piccardi, R., Buccioni, A., Minieri, S. & Lambardi, M. (2010). Green energy from Rhodopseudomonas palustris grown at low to high irradiance values, under fed-batch operational conditions. Biotechnol. Lett. 32, 477–481.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chappell, J. (2004). Valencene synthase – a biochemical magician and harbinger of transgenic aromas. Trends Plant Sci. 9(6), 266–269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheng, S., Xing, D., Call, D.F. & Logan, B.E. (2009). Direct biological conversion of electrical current to methane by electromethanogenesis. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43, 3953–3958.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ciferri, S. (1983). Spirulina, the edible microorganism. Microbiol. Rev. 47(4), 551–578.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deng, M.D. & Coleman, J.R. (1999). Ethanol synthesis by genetic engineering in cyanobacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65, 523–528.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dismukes, G.C., Carrieri, D., Bennette, N., Ananyev, G.M. & Posewitz, M.C. (2008). Aquatic phototrophs: efficient alternatives to land-based crops for biofuels. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 19(3), 235–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ducat, D.C., Way, J.C. & Silver, P.A. (2011). Engineering cyanobacteria to generate high-value products. Trends Biotechnol. 29(2), 95–103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elverum, G.W., Bagian, J.P., Colwell, R.R., Dunn, B., Humphrey, D.R., Kanade, T., Llinas, R.R. & Stupp, S.I. (1998). Report of the Workshop on Biology-based Technology to Enhance Human Well-being and Function in Extended Space Exploration. National Academy Press, pp. 19–22.Google Scholar
Faus, I. (2000). Recent developments in the characterization and biotechnological production of sweet-tasting proteins. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 53(2), 145–151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hale, V., Keasling, J.D., Renninger, N. & Diagana, T.T. (2007). Microbially derived artemisinin: a biotechnology solution to the global problem of access to affordable antimalarial drugs. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 77(6 Suppl.), 198–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntley, M. & Redalje, D. (2007). CO2 mitigation and renewable oil from photosynthetic microbes: a new appraisal. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Change 12, 573–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, C.J., Boyle, P.M., Waks, Z. & Silver, P.A. (2009). Systems-level engineering of nonfermentative metabolism in yeast. Genetics 183, 385–397.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kharatyan, S.G. (1978). Microbes as food for humans. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 32, 301–327.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, G.N., Zhu, Y.H. & Jiang, J.G. (2009). The metabolomics of carotenoids in engineered cell factory. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 83(6), 989–999.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Madison, L.L. & Huisman, G.W. (1999). Metabolic engineering of poly(3-hydroxyalkanoates): from DNA to plastic. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 63(1), 21–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McEwan, A.G. (1994). Photosynthetic electron transport and anaerobic metabolism in purple non-sulfur bacteria. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 66, 151–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ming, D. & Hellekant, G. (1994). Brazzein, a new high-potency thermostable sweet protein from Pentadiplandra brazzeana B. FEBS Lett. 355(1), 106–108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Niederholtmeyer, H., Wolfstädter, B.T., Savage, D.F., Silver, P.A. & Way, J.C. (2010). Engineering cyanobacteria to synthesize and export hydrophilic products. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76, 3462–3466.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Obeid, J., Magnin, J.-P., Flaus, J.M., Adrot, O., Willison, J.C. & Zlatev, R. (2009). Modelling of hydrogen production in batch cultures of the photosynthetic bacterium Rhodobacter capsulatus. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 34, 180–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palsson, B. (2006). Systems Biology: Properties of Reconstructed Networks. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posten, C. (2009). Design principles of photo-bioreactors for cultivation of microalgae. Eng. Life Sci. 9, 165–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radakovits, R., Jinkerson, R.E., Darzins, A. & Posewitz, M.C. (2010). Genetic engineering of algae for enhanced biofuel production. Eukaryotic Cell 9(4), 486–501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Savage, D.F., Way, J.C. & Silver, P.A. (2008). Defossiling fuel: how synthetic biology can transform biofuel production. ACS Chem. Biol. 3, 13–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schirmer, A., Rude, M.A., Li, X., Popova, E. & del Cardayre, S.B. (2010). Microbial biosynthesis of alkanes. Science 329, 559–562.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shastri, A.A. & Morgan, J.A. (2005). Flux balance analysis of photoautotrophic metabolism. Biotechnol. Prog. 21, 1617–1626.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smolke, C.D. (ed.) (2010). The Metabolic Engineering Handbook. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
Straub, K.L., Benz, M. & Schink, B. (2001). Mini Review: Iron metabolism in anoxic environments at near neutral pH. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 34, 181–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sudesh, K., Taguchi, K. & Doi, Y. (2002). Effect of increased PHA synthase activity on polyhydroxyalkanoates biosynthesis in Synechocystis sp. PCC6803. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 30, 97–104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thrash, L.C. & Coates, J.D. (2008). Direct and indirect electrical stimulation of microbial metabolism. Environ. Sci. Technol. 42, 3921–3931.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Villano, M., Aulenta, F., Ciucci, C., Ferri, T., Giuliano, A. & Majone, M. (2010). Bioelectrochemical reduction of CO2 to CH4 via direct and indirect extracellular electron transfer by a hydrogenophilic methanogenic culture. Bioresour. Technol. 101, 3085–3090.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed