Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T21:28:46.639Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The role of autocatalysis on the chemical diversity of the prebiotic ocean of early Earth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2015

Carlo Canepa
Carlo Canepa*
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Chimica, Università di Torino, Via Pietro Giuria 7, 10125 Torino, Italy
*
e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The spontaneous formation of catalytic polypeptides of various lengths in a primordial ocean endowed with a source of amino acids from micrometeorites was investigated and found to be sufficient to induce the transformation of potential substrates under the assumption of a high propensity of the environment to catalyse the formation of the peptide bond. This work aims to include in this picture the effect of autocatalysis, i.e. the ability of a polypeptide with a specific length to promote the formation of the peptide bond. Once the formation of an autocatalytic species is attained, the concentrations of the polypeptides, substrates and products of reaction exhibit a time-dependent rate of formation and undergo a catastrophic change. While in the absence of autocatalysis the concentrations of polypeptides are stationary and the formation of reaction products is limited by the proper frequency λ, autocatalysis induces a steady growth of the concentrations of polypeptides and a 100 − 105-fold increase of reaction products at t = ω−1<0.46 Gyr, with a subsequent linear growth in time according to the law u/z0 = 1+s(ω−1+t)/z0, provided the autocatalytic species be active with length fewer than 70 amino acid units. A relationship was found between the catalytic ability of the environment (expressed by the ratio η/ηh of the rate coefficient for peptide bond formation to the corresponding rate coefficient for hydrolysis) and the time of the sharp increase of the concentration of both the polypeptides and their products of transformation. Although the formation of autocatalytic polypeptides is able to rapidly induce a sharp increase in the concentration of both polypeptides and their products of transformation, the crucial formation of the first autocatalytic polypeptides relies on the ability of the environment to promote the formation of the peptide bond. The value of the ratio η/ηh, constrained by the available time for chemical evolution to values bordering the catalytic activity of present-day enzymes, suggests that the correlation between the presence of water and the formation of a complex chemistry should be taken with caution.

Keywords

autocatalysisenzymesprebiotic chemistry.
Type
Research Article
Information
International Journal of Astrobiology , Volume 15 , Special Issue 1: SPECIAL ISSUE LUCAL , January 2016 , pp. 57 - 64
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anders, E. (1989). Pre-biotic organic matter from comets and asteroids. Nature 342, 255–257.Google Scholar
Arndt, P., Bohsung, J., Maetz, M. & Jessberger, E.K. (1996). The elemental abundances in interplanetary dust particles. Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 31, 817–833.Google Scholar
Canepa, C. (2013). The role of catalysis on the formation of an active proto-enzyme in the prebiotic aqueous environment. Nat. Sci. 5, 549–555.Google Scholar
Canepa, C. (2014). On the chemical diversity of the prebiotic ocean of early Earth. Int. J. Astrobiol. available on CJO2014. DOI: 10.1017/S1473550414000688.Google Scholar
Chyba, C.F., Thomas, P.J., Brookshaw, L. & Sagan, C. (1990). Cometary delivery of organic molecules to the early earth. Science 249, 366–373.Google Scholar
Chyba, C.F. & Sagan, C. (1992). Endogenous production, exogenous delivery and impact-shock synthesis of organic molecules: an inventory for the origins of life. Science 355, 125–132.Google Scholar
De Ley, J. (1968). Molecular biology and bacterial phylogeny. J. Evol. Biol. 2, 103–156.Google Scholar
Ehrenfreund, P., Glavin, D.P., Botta, O., Cooper, G. & Bada, J.L. (2001). Extraterrestrial amino acids in Orgueil and Ivuna: tracing the parent body of CI type carbonaceous chondrites. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 2138–2141.Google Scholar
Gorlero, M., Wieczorek, R., Adamala, K., Giorgi, A., Schininà, M.E., Stano, P. & Luisi, P.L. (2009). Ser-His catalyses the formation of peptides and PNAs. FEBS Lett. 583, 153–156.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, K., Masuda, H., Ushio, K., Ohashi, A., Yamanashi, H., Kaneko, T., Takahashi, J., Hosokawa, T., Hashimoto, H. & Saito, T. (2001). Formation of bioorganic compounds in simulated planetary atmospheres by high energy particles or photons. Adv. Space Res. 27, 207–215.Google Scholar
Pasek, M. & Lauretta, D. (2008). Extraterrestrial flux of potentially prebiotic C, N, and P to the early earth. Orig. Life Evol. Biosph. 38, 5–21.Google Scholar
Pierazzo, E. & Chyba, C.F. (1999). Amino acid survival in large cometary impacts. Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 34, 909–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pizzarello, S., Huang, Y., Becker, L., Poreda, R.J., Nieman, R.A., Cooper, G. & Williams, M. (2001). The organic content of the Tagish Lake meteorite. Science 293, 2236–2239.Google Scholar
Radzicka, A. & Wolfenden, R. (1996). Rates of uncatalyzed peptide bond hydrolysis in neutral solution and the transition state affinities of proteases. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118, 6105–6109.Google Scholar
Soai, K., Shibata, T., Morioka, H. & Choji, K. (1995). Asymmetric autocatalysis and amplification of enantiomeric excess of a chiral molecule. Nature 378, 767–768.Google Scholar
Turányi, T., Györgyi, L. & Field, R.J. (1993). Analysis and simplification of the GTF model of the Belousov-Zhabotinsky reaction. J. Phys. Chem. 97, 1931–1941.Google Scholar
Zaia, D.A.M., Zaia, C.T.B.V. & De Santana, H. (2008). Which amino acids should be used in prebiotic chemistry studies? Orig. Life Evol. Biosph. 38, 469–488.Google Scholar