Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T10:36:42.962Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Habitability constraints by nutrient availability in atmospheres of rocky exoplanets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 April 2024

Oliver Herbort*
Affiliation:
Department for Astrophysics, University of Vienna, Türkenschanzstrasse 17, A-1180 Vienna, Austria
Peter Woitke
Affiliation:
Space Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Schmiedlstrasse 6, A-8042 Graz, Austria
Christiane Helling
Affiliation:
Space Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Schmiedlstrasse 6, A-8042 Graz, Austria TU Graz, Fakultät für Mathematik, Physik und Geodäsie, Petersgasse 16, A-8010 Graz, Austria
Aubrey Lea Zerkle
Affiliation:
Blue Marble Space Institute of Science, Seattle, WA 98104, USA
*
Corresponding author: Oliver Herbort; Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Life as we know it requires the presence of liquid water and the availability of nutrients, which are mainly based on the elements C, H, N, O, P and S (CHNOPS) and trace metal micronutrients. We aim to understand the presence of these nutrients within atmospheres that show the presence of water cloud condensates, potentially allowing the existence of aerial biospheres. In this paper, we introduce a framework of nutrient availability levels based on the presence of water condensates and the chemical state of the CHNOPS elements. These nutrient availability levels are applied to a set of atmospheric models based on different planetary surface compositions resulting in a range of atmospheric compositions. The atmospheric model is a bottom-to-top equilibrium chemistry atmospheric model which includes the atmosphere–crust interaction and the element depletion due to the formation of clouds. While the reduced forms of CNS are present at the water cloud base for most atmospheric compositions, P and metals are lacking. This indicates the potential bio-availability of CNS, while P and metals are limiting factors for aerial biospheres.

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

Some of the key questions for humankind are what the conditions favourable for the creation, evolution and persistence of life on Earth and other planets are. In recent times, many exoplanets have been detected and the question of the potential for biological and chemical processes to exist on these planets arose. These show a vast diversity, some without analogue in our own solar system. Especially for the rocky planets, a large diversity of different atmospheric compositions is expected (e.g. Leconte et al., Reference Leconte, Forget and Lammer2015; Grenfell et al., Reference Grenfell, Leconte, Forget, Godolt, Carrión-González, Noack, Tian, Rauer, Gaillard, Bolmont, Charnay and Turbet2020). While the extent of these atmospheres can range from a large envelope of primordial gas to almost no atmosphere at all, the composition can be very diverse, covering reducing and oxidizing atmospheres. For highly irradiated planets, the atmosphere can be composed of evaporated minerals due to the high temperature, which can melt the planetary surface. Recent observations with JWST for example constrain the presence of atmospheres on Trappist-1b (Ih et al., Reference Ih, Kempton, Whittaker and Lessard2023) and hint to a water-rich atmosphere of GJ 486b (Moran et al., Reference Moran, Stevenson, Sing, MacDonald, Kirk, Lustig-Yaeger, Peacock, Mayorga, Bennett, López-Morales, May, Rustamkulov, Valenti, Adams Redai, Alam, Batalha, Fu, Gonzalez-Quiles, Highland, Kruse, Lothringer, Ortiz Ceballos, Sotzen and Wakeford2023). The upcoming next generation ground and space based telescopes (e.g. ELT Gilmozzi and Spyromilio, Reference Gilmozzi and Spyromilio2007, ARIEL Tinetti et al., Reference Tinetti, Drossart, Eccleston, Hartogh, Heske, Leconte, Micela, Ollivier, Pilbratt, Puig, Turrini, Vandenbussche, Wolkenberg, Beaulieu, Buchave, Ferus, Griffin, Guedel, Justtanont, Lagage, Machado, Malaguti, Min, Nørgaard-Nielsen, Rataj, Ray, Ribas, Swain, Szabo, Werner, Barstow, Burleigh, Cho, Coudé du Foresto, Coustenis, Decin, Encrenaz, Galand, Gillon, Helled, Morales, García Muñoz, Moneti, Pagano, Pascale, Piccioni, Pinfield, Sarkar, Selsis, Tennyson, Triaud, Venot, Waldmann, Waltham, Wright, Amiaux, Auguères, Berthé, Bezawada, Bishop, Bowles, Coffey, Colomé, Crook, Crouzet, Da Peppo, Escudero Sanz, Focardi, Frericks, Hunt, Kohley, Middleton, Morgante, Ottensamer, Pace, Pearson, Stamper, Symonds, Rengel, Renotte, Ade, Affer, Alard, Allard, Altieri, André, Arena, Argyriou, Aylward, Baccani, Bakos, Banaszkiewicz, Barlow, Batista, Bellucci, Benatti, Bernardi, Bézard, Blecka, Bolmont, Bonfond, Bonito, Bonomo, Brucato, Brun, Bryson, Bujwan, Casewell, Charnay, Cecchi Pestellini, Chen, Ciaravella, Claudi, Clédassou, Damasso, Damiano, Danielski, Deroo, Di Giorgio, Dominik, Doublier, Doyle, Doyon, Drummond, Duong, Eales, Edwards, Farina, Flaccomio, Fletcher, Forget, Fossey, Fränz, Fujii, García-Piquer, Gear, Geoffray, Gérard, Gesa, Gomez, Graczyk, Griffith, Grodent, Guarcello, Gustin, Hamano, Hargrave, Hello, Heng, Herrero, Hornstrup, Hubert, Ida, Ikoma, Iro, Irwin, Jarchow, Jaubert, Jones, Julien, Kameda, Kerschbaum, Kervella, Koskinen, Krijger, Krupp, Lafarga, Landini, Lellouch, Leto, Luntzer, Rank-Lüftinger, Maggio, Maldonado, Maillard, Mall, Marquette, Mathis, Maxted, Matsuo, Medvedev, Miguel, Minier, Morello, Mura, Narita, Nascimbeni, Nguyen, Noce, Oliva, Palle, Palmer, Pancrazzi, Papageorgiou, Parmentier, Perger, Petralia, Pezzuto, Pierrehumbert, Pillitteri, Piotto, Pisano, Prisinzano, Radioti, Réess, Rezac, Rocchetto, Rosich, Sanna, Santerne, Savini, Scandariato, Sicardy, Sierra, Sindoni, Sindoni, Snellen, Sobiecki, Soret, Sozzetti, Stiepen, Strugarek, Taylor, Taylor, Terenzi, Tessenyi, Tsiaras, Tucker, Valencia, Vasisht, Vazan, Vilardell, Vinatier, Viti, Waters, Wawer, Wawrzaszek, Whitworth, Yung, Yurchenko, Zapatero Osorio, Zellem, Zingales and Zwart2018) will allow to further investigate the composition of atmospheres of rocky exoplanets (see e.g. Lopez-Morales et al., Reference Lopez-Morales, Currie, Teske, Gaidos, Kempton, Males, Lewis, Rackham, Ben-Ami, Birkby, Charbonneau, Close, Crane, Dressing, Froning, Hasegawa, Konopacky, Kopparapu, Mawet, Mennesson, Ramirez, Stelter, Szentgyorgyi, Wang, Alam, Collins, Dupree, Karovska, Kirk, Levi, McGruder, Packman, Rugheimer and Rukdee2019; Wunderlich et al., Reference Wunderlich, Scheucher, Grenfell, Schreier, Sousa-Silva, Godolt and Rauer2021; Ito et al., Reference Ito, Changeat, Edwards, Al-Refaie, Tinetti and Ikoma2021). The detailed understanding of the planets itself becomes important for interpreting observations, especially for the detection of biosignatures (Catling et al., Reference Catling, Krissansen-Totton, Kiang, Crisp, Robinson, Dassarma, Rushby, Del Genio, Bains and Domagal-Goldman2018; Meadows et al., Reference Meadows, Reinhard, Arney, Parenteau, Schwieterman, Domagal-Goldman, Lincowski, Stapelfeldt, Rauer and DasSarma2018; Lisse et al., Reference Lisse, Desch, Unterborn, Kane, Young, Hartnett, Hinkel, Shim, Mamajek and Izenberg2020; Lyons et al., Reference Lyons, Rogers, Krishnamurthy, Williams, Marchi, Schwieterman, Trail, Planavsky and Reinhard2021). These signatures of life are mostly confined to water-based life, as it is the only known form of life. However, other solvents like $\rm {NH_3}$ or $\rm {CH_4}$ could potentially replace the liquid water for the formation of life (e.g. Ballesteros et al., Reference Ballesteros, Fernandez-Soto and Martínez2019).

In order to understand and constrain the existence of liquid water on the surface of a planet, the habitable zone has been defined (e.g. Huang, Reference Huang1959; Kasting et al., Reference Kasting, Whitmire and Reynolds1993). This concept has been further adjusted by including energy budgets and constraints on other molecules such as $\rm {CO_2}$ for further needs for the evolution of life (e.g. Hoehler, Reference Hoehler2007; Ramirez, Reference Ramirez2020) and can explain the water on Earth and on the young Mars (Lammer et al., Reference Lammer, Zerkle, Gebauer, Tosi, Noack, Scherf, Pilat-Lohinger, Güdel, Grenfell, Godolt and Nikolaou2018). However, water can also be found outside of this habitable zone, for example in sub-glacial oceans on Europa and Enceladus (Tjoa et al., Reference Tjoa, Mueller and Van Der Tak2020) as well as in clouds of rocky planets, sub-Neptunes and gas giants (Benneke et al., Reference Benneke, Wong, Piaulet, Knutson, Lothringer, Morley, Crossfield, Gao, Greene, Dressing, Dragomir, Howard, McCullough, Kempton, Fortney and Fraine2019; Charnay et al., Reference Charnay, Blain, Bézard, Leconte, Turbet and Falco2021; Madhusudhan et al., Reference Madhusudhan, Piette and Constantinou2021; Mang et al., Reference Mang, Gao, Hood, Fortney, Batalha, Yu and de Pater2022). This shows that a large diversity of water environments is to be expected for exoplanets. Whereas the liquid water in oceans and below frozen surfaces provide the potential for subsurface biospheres on rocky planets and moons, the presence of water clouds on any planet could allow for some aerial biospheres.

The potential of an aerial biospheres for Venus, or as a general scenario, has been discussed previously (e.g. Morowitz and Sagan, Reference Morowitz and Sagan1967; Woese, Reference Woese1979; Dartnell et al., Reference Dartnell, Nordheim, Patel, Mason, Coates and Jones2015), and recently gained further interest (Greaves et al., Reference Greaves, Richards, Bains, Rimmer, Sagawa, Clements, Seager, Petkowski, Sousa-Silva, Ranjan, Drabek-Maunder, Fraser, Cartwright, Mueller-Wodarg, Zhan, Friberg, Coulson, Lee and Hoge2021; Kotsyurbenko et al., Reference Kotsyurbenko, Cordova, Belov, Cheptsov, Kölbl, Khrunyk, Kryuchkova, Milojevic, Mogul, Sasaki, Słowik, Snytnikov and Vorobyova2021; Rimmer et al., Reference Rimmer, Jordan, Constantinou, Woitke, Shorttle, Hobbs and Paschodimas2021; Patel et al., Reference Patel, Mason, Nordheim and Dartnell2022) following from the proposed detection of phosphine ($\rm {PH_3}$) in Venus’ atmosphere (Greaves et al., Reference Greaves, Richards, Bains, Rimmer, Sagawa, Clements, Seager, Petkowski, Sousa-Silva, Ranjan, Drabek-Maunder, Fraser, Cartwright, Mueller-Wodarg, Zhan, Friberg, Coulson, Lee and Hoge2021).

While Bains et al. (Reference Bains, Petkowski, Seager, Ranjan, Sousa-Silva, Rimmer, Zhan, Greaves and Richards2021, Reference Bains, Shorttle, Ranjan, Rimmer, Petkowski, Greaves and Seager2022) discussed that there is no known process available to abiotically produce a $\rm {PH_3}$ feature in the Venus atmosphere, Omran et al. (Reference Omran, Oze, Jackson, Mehta, Barge, Bada and Pasek2021) investigate the general possibility of phosphine production on rocky exoplanets. Assuming the production by some kind of living organism, this would introduce the necessity of a biosphere which is only present in a cloud layer. Individual organisms would need to remain afloat for long enough to metabolize and reproduce, before eventually falling towards the surface of Venus (Seager et al., Reference Seager, Petkowski, Gao, Bains, Bryan, Ranjan and Greaves2021a, Reference Seager, Petkowski, Günther, Bains, Mikal-Evans and Deming2021b; Patel et al., Reference Patel, Mason, Nordheim and Dartnell2022). This concept of aerial biospheres enlarges the possibilities of potential habitability from the presence of liquid water on the surface to all planets with liquid water clouds. See Seager et al. (Reference Seager, Petkowski, Günther, Bains, Mikal-Evans and Deming2021b) for a discussion on the potential of aerial biospheres on mini-Neptunes. The water clouds of such planets could provide the chemical potential for the formation of life (Hallsworth et al., Reference Hallsworth, Koop, Dallas, Zorzano, Burkhardt, Golyshina, Martín-Torres, Dymond, Ball and McKay2021). This motivates a further investigation of the chemical environment of such aerial biospheres.

For the formation of life, the presence of liquid water is not the only hurdle to overcome, but also further elements and conditions need to be biologically available (see e.g. Deamer et al., Reference Deamer, Cary and Damer2022). All life as we know it is made up of carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen, phosphorus and sulphur, in the following referred to as CHNOPS elements (Horneck et al., Reference Horneck, Walter, Westall, Grenfell, Martin, Gomez, Leuko, Lee, Onofri, Tsiganis, Saladino, Pilat-Lohinger, Palomba, Harrison, Rull, Muller, Strazzulla, Brucato, Rettberg and Capria2016). If these elements are available, chemical reactions triggered by stellar radiation, lightning, high energetic particles and cosmic rays can lead to the production of molecules, which allow the formation of amino acids and other pre-biotic molecules from which life can eventually form (see e.g. Bailey et al., Reference Bailey, Helling, Hodosán, Bilger and Stark2014; Ferus et al., Reference Ferus, Kubelík, Kníek, Pastorek, Sutherland and Civis2017; Ranjan et al., Reference Ranjan, Kufner, Lozano, Todd, Haseki and Sasselov2021; Barth et al., Reference Barth, Helling, Stüeken, Bourrier, Mayne, Rimmer, Jardine, Vidotto, Wheatley and Fares2021). For these reactions, the red-ox state in which the elements are present is of particular importance, because elemental speciation dictates bioavailability.

The importance of the CHNOPS elements for life can be illustrated by the Redfield ratio. Redfield (Reference Redfield1934) described, that organic matter in all of Earth's oceans comprises of a fairly constant ratio of CNP. This has been further expended to further elements (e.g. Anderson and Sarmiento, Reference Anderson and Sarmiento1994; Ho et al., Reference Ho, Quigg, Finkel, Milligan, Wyman, Falkowski and Morel2003), revealing a stoichiometric ratio of C124, N16, P1 and S1.3, with further traces of metals. This universal incorporation of these nutrient elements underlines their importance to life as we know it and shows that the P and S are limiting factors for life.

In order to investigate the pre-biotic atmospheres from which life might evolve, we investigate and characterize the chemical state of the elements present in atmospheres of rocky exoplanets, with liquid water thermally stable at some point in the atmosphere. We use a chemical equilibrium model for the lower parts of atmospheres of rocky exoplanets with various surface compositions, which allow the study of all elements present in the gas phase. We especially focus on the different CHNOPS elements which are necessary for the formation of pre-biotic molecules in exoplanetary atmospheres.

Defining nutrient availability levels

The characterization of the habitability potential of different atmospheric compositions should take not only the presence of liquid water, but also the availability of essential elements into account. Therefore, we introduce a concept of nutrient availability levels.

The fundamental substance for any discussion of biology as we know it is liquid water. Therefore, the presence of liquid water is used as a prerequisite for every nutrient availability level. We considered any atmosphere without water condensates as uninhabitable. We defined atmospheres with only liquid water, but no nutrient elements, as having level 0 nutrient availability.

We define further nutrient availability levels as having the stability of water as a precondition and are based on the presence of the elements C, N and S, as H and O are by definition already present in the form of $\rm {H_{2}O}$. We define an element i as present, if the concentration of an i bearing molecule is greater than one part per billion (10−9, ppb). As the current understanding of the formation of life does not allow to preciously define a lower threshold for the needed concentrations of any molecule, we set this threshold to 1 ppb in the gas phase as this allows for the inclusion of atmospheric trace species. In principle, also atmospheric species with lower concentrations could accumulate locally by for example dissolution in cloud droplets. However, such processes are not included in this work and therefore the trace species concentration of 1 ppb is applied to define the presence of a molecule. If one or two of C, N and S are present, the atmosphere is classified as level 1 and level 2, respectively. In order to distinguish the different kinds of level 1 and 2, the present elements are added to the notation. For example, if C is present, but not N and S, the atmospheric composition classifies as level 1C. Following on this, the nutrient availability level 3 requires the presence of all three elements.

For the nutrient availability level 3, we further distinguish between the chemical redox state of the CNS elements. If all three elements are present in a reduced form ($\rm {CH_4}$ for C, $\rm {NH_3}$ for N and $\rm {H_{2}S}$ for S), the nutrient availability level is classified as level 3red. The need for this additional distinction is motivated as under such reducing conditions processes such as lightning can result in the formation of pre-biotic molecules, such as $\rm {HCN}$, amino acids and nucleobasis (e.g. Miller, Reference Miller1953; Miller and Urey, Reference Miller and Urey1959; Toupance et al., Reference Toupance, Raulin and Buvet1975; Ferris et al., Reference Ferris, Joshi, Edelson and Lawless1978; Parker et al., Reference Parker, Cleaves, Callahan, Dworkin, Glavin, Lazcano and Bada2011; Ferus et al., Reference Ferus, Kubelík, Kníek, Pastorek, Sutherland and Civis2017; Pearce et al., Reference Pearce, Molaverdikhani, Pudritz, Henning and Cerrillo2022). Similarly to the reduced case, we define the oxidized regime as level 3ox with the presence of $\rm {CO_2}$, $\rm {NO_2}$ and $\rm {SO_2}$. It is also possible, that different redox states of an element coexist in an atmosphere. If for carbon, nitrogen and sulphur the oxidized and reduced from coexist, with all species present at concentrations more than 10−9, the atmosphere is categorized as nutrient availability level 3redox. In Woitke et al. (Reference Woitke, Herbort, Helling, Stüeken, Dominik, Barth and Samra2021), we have shown that the coexistence of $\rm {CO_2}$ and $\rm {CH_4}$ is a fundamental result of chemical equilibrium for specific element abundances.

Molecular nitrogen shows a very strong triple bond, which makes it much less accessible for life than other nitrogen sources such as and $\rm {NH_3}$ or $\rm {NO_2}$. Therefore, we distinguish between the presence of nitrogen in a more easily accessible form and $\rm {N_2}$. We note that multiple processes exist, which transform $\rm {N_2}$ to the more easily accessible forms of nitrogen (see e.g. Burris and Wilson, Reference Burris and Wilson1945; Stüeken, Reference Stüeken2016). Examples for these can be of natural origin (e.g. lightning or UV and cosmic ray radiation) as well as biotic by microbes.

In addition to the nutrient availability levels based on CNS, the presence of phosphorus is a further constraint for the formation of life. As it is a limiting factor for the biosphere on Earth (Syverson et al., Reference Syverson, Reinhard, Isson, Holstege, Katchinoff, Tutolo, Etschmann, Brugger and Planavsky2021), we use it as a category on its own. All nutrient availability levels are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1. Definition of the nutrient availability levels

Notes: The tick marks and crosses indicate the presence and absence of the element in the header of the table, respectively. An element is considered present, if at least one molecule incorporating the element in question is present in the gas phase at concentrations above 10−9. The state of the elements indicated with ‘–’ do not matter for the definition of the respective nutrient availability level.

‘red’: indicates that the reduced form of the respective element ($\rm {CH_4}$, $\rm {NH_3}$, $\rm {H_{2}S}$) is present at concentrations higher than 10−9.

‘ox’: indicates the presence of the oxidized state ($\rm {CO_2}$, $\rm {NO_x}$, $\rm {SO_2}$) at concentrations higher than 10−9.

While these six molecules are the most prominent CNS bearing molecules, further molecules contributing to the presence of these elements are $\rm {CO}$, $\rm {COS}$, $\rm {HNO_3}$, $\rm {S_{2}O}$, $\rm {H_{2}SO_{4}}$ and $\rm {S_x}$.

These nutrient availability levels are defined to investigate whether or not atmospheres with liquid water clouds can provide basic necessities for possible aerial biosphere. In order to principally allow the presence of an aerial biosphere, all nutrients need to be available. However, even in the case of their presence, further questions of whether such an aerial biosphere can exist need to be investigated. This includes but is not limited to processes that form more complex chemicals from the nutrients, but also whether life can remain afloat for long enough periods of time.

Atmospheric model

In order to investigate the implications of the concept of the different nutrient availability levels defined in the previous section on atmospheres of rocky planets, we create atmospheric models with different element abundances to which we apply the concept of the nutrient availability levels. The atmospheric model is presented in Herbort et al. (Reference Herbort, Woitke, Helling and Zerkle2022) and uses the chemical equilibrium solver GGchem (Woitke et al., Reference Woitke, Helling, Hunter, Millard, Turner, Worters, Blecic and Stock2018). The bottom-to-top atmosphere model describes the lower atmosphere with a polytropic hydrostatic equilibrium atmosphere which takes element depletion by cloud formation into account. The base of the atmosphere is in chemical phase equilibrium with the crust, as described in Herbort et al. (Reference Herbort, Woitke, Helling and Zerkle2020). In every atmospheric layer, the chemical equilibrium is solved and all thermally stable condensates are removed while the gas phase is the total element abundance of the atmospheric layer above. This depletes the element abundances of all elements affected by cloud formation. Each bottom-to-top atmosphere is fully defined by the surface pressure (p surf), surface temperature (T surf), set of total element abundances $( \epsilon _ {\rm tot})$ and the polytropic index (γ).

As in Herbort et al. (Reference Herbort, Woitke, Helling and Zerkle2022), we investigate (p,  T) profiles with a constant polytropic index γ = 1.25. The surface conditions are defined such that the atmosphere reaches the reference temperature of T ref = 300 K in the atmosphere at p ref = 1 bar. This is guaranteed for a (p gas,  T gas) profile defined by

(1)$$T_{\rm gas} = {T_{\rm ref}\over p_{\rm ref}^{1-1/\gamma}} \cdot p_{\rm gas}^{1-1/\gamma}.$$

We investigate a surface temperature range from 300 K to 1000 K. The surface pressures for the different surface temperatures are given by equation (1) to ensure that all atmospheric profiles reach the reference point.

In our calculations, the included 18 elements (H, C, N, O, F, Na, Mg, Al, Si, P, S, Cl, K, Ca, Ti, Cr, Mn and Fe) can form 471 gas species and 208 condensates. The total element abundances $\epsilon _ {\rm tot}$ for the different compositions used in this paper are listed in Table A1 and briefly introduced in the following. The compositions of Bulk Silicate Earth (BSE, Schaefer et al., Reference Schaefer, Lodders and Fegley2012), Continental Crust (CC, Schaefer et al., Reference Schaefer, Lodders and Fegley2012), Mid Oceanic Ridge Basalt (MORB, Arevalo and McDonough, Reference Arevalo and McDonough2010) and CI chondrite (CI, Lodders et al., Reference Lodders, Palme and Gail2009) are used to represent a variety of different rock compositions. In order to investigate different levels of hydration, we use sets of element abundances based on BSE with increased abundances of H and O (BSE12, BSE15). The enrichment of respectively 12 and 15 weight percent H and O results in a crust composition rich in hydrated minerals (for further details see Herbort et al., Reference Herbort, Woitke, Helling and Zerkle2020). The Earth set of total element abundances is the result of a fit of our atmosphere-crust chemical and phase equilibrium model. At p = 1.013 bar and T = 288.15 K, this set of element abundances results in a modern Earth-like gas phase, except for the $\rm {CH_4}$, which is in disequilibrium (for further details see Appendix A Herbort et al., Reference Herbort, Woitke, Helling and Zerkle2022). The Archean model represents a strongly reducing atmosphere (presence of $\rm {CH_4}$ and $\rm {NH_3}$) and stable $\rm {H_{2}O}$[l]. In order to also include non-solar system-based elemental ratios, three models based on element abundances from polluted white dwarfs (PWD Melis and Dufour Reference Melis and Dufour2016) are included. As not all elements are included, the missing abundances (especially H) are completed from BSE, MORB and CI. In order to investigate hydrogen-rich atmospheres, a model with solar abundances (Asplund et al., Reference Asplund, Grevesse, Sauval and Scott2009) is taken into account. For further discussions and effects of these elemental compositions for different temperature regimes, see Herbort et al. (Reference Herbort, Woitke, Helling and Zerkle2020) and Herbort et al. (Reference Herbort, Woitke, Helling and Zerkle2022).

Results

In this section, we investigate nutrient availability levels in our model atmospheres with different sets of total element abundances and subsequently discuss the effects on the different elements individually.

First we illustrate the nutrient availability levels for a single model atmosphere for CC total element abundances and surface conditions of T surf = 700 K and p surf = 70 bar shown in Fig. 1. The nutrient availability levels are indicated at the top of the left panel. At the surface, the atmosphere is dominated by $\rm {CO_2}$ and $\rm {H_{2}O}$, with ten further molecules being present at concentrations higher than 10−9. This includes $\rm {H_{2}S}$, $\rm {CO}$, $\rm {SO_2}$, $\rm {COS}$ and $\rm {S_2}$ as CHNOS bearing molecules. With decreasing pressure and temperature, $\rm {CH_4}$ becomes the second most important carbon bearing species while $\rm {CO}$ and $\rm {COS}$ decrease in concentration. At p gas ≈ 3.5 bar, $\rm {H_{2}O}$[l] becomes a thermally stable condensate. Due to the presence of $\rm {CH_4}$, $\rm {NH_3}$ and $\rm {H_{2}S}$, this part of the atmosphere is of nutrient availability level 3red. It is remarkable that C, N and S are all abundant in their reduced form, despite the most abundant species in the atmosphere being oxidized. The removal of $\rm {H_{2}O}$[l] and $\rm {NH_{4}Cl}$[s] condensates causes the depletion of $\rm {H_{2}O}$, $\rm {H_2}$, $\rm {CH_4}$ and $\rm {NH_3}$. The drop of $\rm {NH_3}$ below a concentration of 10−9 causes the nutrient availability level to change to level 2CS. The removal of the thermally stable $\rm {S_2}$[s] condensate causes the decrease in $\rm {H_{2}S}$ concentration, which drops below 10−9 leaving behind a level 1C atmosphere. The only molecules, which reach concentrations above 10−9 for T gas < 450 K and include further elements besides CHNOPS include fluorine or chlorine. The respective concentrations of $\rm {HCl}$ and $\rm {HF}$ remain roughly constant throughout the atmosphere. Similarly, $\rm {N_2}$ does not show large changes in concentration.

Figure 1. Results of the 1D atmospheric model for CC total element abundances and surface conditions of T surf = 700 K and p surf = 70 bar. Left panel: Gas-phase composition of the model atmosphere with the indicated nutrient availability levels at the top. Right panel: Thermally stable cloud condensates in the model atmosphere.

Applying nutrient availability levels

The nutrient availability levels for the 12 different sets of total element abundances with varying surface conditions are shown in Fig. 2. Although these nutrient availability levels all require the presence of liquid water, the regions without water condensates are indicated similarly to the nutrient availability levels, but shaded in black. Of the 18 elements included in this model, only nine elements (C, H, N, O, P, S, Cl, F and Si) are present in the investigated atmospheric (p gas,  T gas) space in the form of a gas-phase molecule with concentrations higher than n i/n tot > 10−9, where n i is the number density of the the molecule i and n tot is the total number density. All 23 molecules that reach concentrations above 10−9 in the investigated part of the atmosphere are listed in Table 2 and sorted according to their peak concentration in any of the models.

Figure 2. Nutrient availability levels applied to a range of atmospheric models for different sets of total element abundances. The colouring of all present nutrient availability levels are given in the legend above. The solid black line provides the pressure level of the $\rm {H_{2}O}$[l,s] cloud base in the respective models. The darker shade of the nutrient availability levels (indicated with * in the legend) shows the corresponding nutrient availability level of gas-phase composition although the primary assumption of the presence of $\rm {H_{2}O}$[l,s] is not fulfilled. The green cross hatched region indicates $\rm {N_2}/n_{\rm tot} < 10^{-9}$. The horizontal dotted lines refer to the gas phase temperature T gas.

Table 2. Gas-phase molecules according to their highest concentration in the models

Notes: Some of the present molecules are only present in few atmospheric models. For these, the defining character of these models is added in brackets. Examples are a specific temperature range or a given total element abundance.

Most atmospheres for the different sets of total element abundances are nutrient availability level 3red at the water cloud base. However, for $T_{\rm surf} \lesssim 400$ K, the concentrations of the sulphur bearing molecules are lower than 10−9 and the nutrient availability level drops to level 2CN or level 1C with additional $\rm {N_2}$ being present. For these lower temperatures, the S abundance in the atmosphere is significantly lower, as more sulphur is incorporated into the crust (see Appendix).

The most dominant transition in the nutrient availability levels is the change from level 3red to level 2CS, which occurs in most of the models. This depletion in available nitrogen is a result of the condensation of $\rm {NH_{4}Cl}$[l], which reduces the N element abundances. Especially for the BSE12, BSE15 and MORB sets of total element abundances, the condensation of $\rm {NH_{4}Cl}$[s] depletes the N abundances such that also the $\rm {N_2}$ concentration drops below 10−9.

Besides $\rm {H_{2}O}$[l,s] and $\rm {NH_{4}Cl}$[s] a total of further 16 thermally stable condensates with normalized number densities of n cond/n tot > 10−10 are present (see also Herbort et al., Reference Herbort, Woitke, Helling and Zerkle2022). These thermally stable cloud condensates can be seen in Fig. A3 in Appendix. For all sets of total element abundances $\rm {NaCl}$[s] and $\rm {KCl}$[s] are stable condensates for T gas > 700 K. Furthermore, every set of element abundances shows a (p gas,  T gas) region, where $\rm {H_{2}O}$[s] condenses. Only for the solar abundances there is no regime with $\rm {H_{2}O}$[l] as a condensate. Another cloud condensate that is thermally stable in atmosphere of all element abundances, except solar, is the N bearing condensate $\rm {NH_{4}Cl}$[s].

A more strict definition of the nutrient availability levels would include a concentration threshold of 10−6 instead of 10−9 for the relevant elements. The resulting nutrient availability levels for this are shown in Fig. A2. The parameter space that the level 3red nutrient availability regions are covering is significantly shrunken and mostly replaced by level 2CS. This result shows that the presence of N can especially be a limiting factor if concentrations of the order of 10−8 for nitrogen bearing species is not sufficient.

In all models that reach nutrient availability level 3, the molecules are present in the reduced form. This is also true for the majority of the parts of the atmosphere, where water is not a stable condensate. The only model, where this is not the case is for the CC total element abundances with T surf ≈ 500 K and T gas > 425 K.

Hydrogen, oxygen and water

The most fundamental molecule for the discussion of habitability is water, which is not only present as a condensate, but also as a dominant gas-phase molecule in many planetary atmosphere. Figure A9 in the Appendix shows the gas-phase concentrations of $\rm {H_{2}O}$, $\rm {H_2}$ and $\rm {O_2}$.

The BSE and PWD BSE models are the models with the lowest $\rm {H_{2}O}$ concentration, due to the low hydrogen mass fraction in the total element abundances. $\rm {H_{2}O}$ does not reach concentrations above 10−6 for $T_{\rm surf}\lesssim 430\, {\rm K}$ and for $T_{\rm surf}\lesssim 340\, {\rm K}$ the $\rm {H_{2}O}$ concentration stays below 10−9. The only other models, for which the $\rm {H_{2}O}$ concentrations drop below 10−9 are the sets of total element abundances of MORB and CC with $T_{\rm surf}\lesssim 340\,$K. For all other models, the $\rm {H_{2}O}$ concentrations are significantly higher and can become the most abundant gas-phase species, especially for high surface temperature models.

As noted above, for all sets of total element abundances, there exist atmospheric models, where $\rm {H_{2}O}$[l,s] cloud condensates are stable and abundant. The $\rm {H_{2}O}$ gas-phase concentration above the cloud base is a result of the assumption of unity for the supersaturation, S($\rm {H_{2}O}$[l,s]) = 1. Therefore, every two models at the same (p gas,  T gas) above the water cloud base show the same gas-phase concentration of $\rm {H_{2}O}$. This confines the maximum $\rm {H_{2}O}$ concentration for the atmosphere above.

The only model which shows the presence of gaseous $\rm {O_2}$ is the Earth model, as it is created to have an atmospheric composition similar to modern day Earth's atmosphere for T surf = 288 K at the surface (Appendix A of Herbort et al., Reference Herbort, Woitke, Helling and Zerkle2022). For higher surface temperatures, the $\rm {O_2}$ concentration reduces as the $\rm {CO_2}$ concentration increases to become the most abundant gas-phase molecule, surpassing $\rm {N_2}$. As the Earth model is the only model with a type B atmosphere (oxygen rich, see Woitke et al., Reference Woitke, Herbort, Helling, Stüeken, Dominik, Barth and Samra2021; Herbort et al., Reference Herbort, Woitke, Helling and Zerkle2022), it is the only model to show $\rm {O_2}$ as a gas species. For $\rm {H_2}$ on the other hand, the picture is different, as the models for total element abundances of solar, Archean and CI composition result in atmospheres rich in $\rm {H_2}$ for all surface temperatures (type A atmospheres Woitke et al., Reference Woitke, Herbort, Helling, Stüeken, Dominik, Barth and Samra2021). For BSE12 and BSE15 total element abundances, $\rm {H_2}$ is present for all T surf where water is not condensing. For all other models, $\rm {H_2}$ is only a trace gas.

Carbon

Of the CNS elements, carbon is the only element, for which there are always molecules present at concentrations higher than 10−9 for the entire parameter space of all sets of total element abundances studied in this paper. Carbon is bound in different oxidization states, ranging from $\rm {CH_4}$ to $\rm {CO_2}$, with some additional traces of $\rm {CO}$ and $\rm {COS}$ at concentrations of 10−6 (see Fig. A4). This coexistence of $\rm {CH_4}$ and $\rm {CO_2}$ is a fundamental result of chemical equilibrium for all atmospheres of atmospheric type C (Woitke et al., Reference Woitke, Herbort, Helling, Stüeken, Dominik, Barth and Samra2021). For $T_{\rm gas}\lesssim 350$ K, both redox end-members of carbon are present at concentrations higher than 0.1% in multiple models, while only PWD CI, Earth, Archean and Solar total element abundances show no coexistence of these redox states throughout the parameter space. The trace forms of carbon $\rm {COS}$ and $\rm {CO}$ are only present at concentrations up to 10−6, if $\rm {CO_2}$ is present at more than 0.1%. The importance of especially $\rm {CO}$ increases with higher gas temperature towards the lower parts of the model atmospheres. The significant presence of $\rm {CO}$ as a major carbon species can be seen in other works, such as Fegley et al. (Reference Fegley, Zolotov and Lodders1997); Visscher et al. (Reference Visscher, Lodders and Fegley2006); Woitke et al. (Reference Woitke, Herbort, Helling, Stüeken, Dominik, Barth and Samra2021) and others.

Throughout the atmospheres in this paper, the only form of carbon which is thermally stable as a condensate in the atmosphere is $\rm {C}$[s] (graphite). It is only thermally stable in atmospheres where $\rm {CH_4}$ and $\rm {CO_2}$ coexist. In these cases, the atmospheric composition in the upper parts of the atmosphere evolves towards the dominance of the more abundant one of the two carbon molecules. The concentration of the respective other molecule decreases significantly as a result due to the ongoing depletion of carbon in the atmosphere. As discussed in Herbort et al. (Reference Herbort, Woitke, Helling and Zerkle2022), graphite is the only condensate which can be thermally stable for the entire investigated T gas parameter space. The models based on CC total element abundances are the only ones for which $\rm {CH_4}$ and $\rm {CO_2}$ coexist in the atmosphere and $\rm {C}$[s] does not condense.

For the carbon condensation, the different element abundances fall into three different regimes. For the element abundance without carbon condensation in the atmosphere and a hydrogen-rich atmosphere, also no carbon bearing condensate is stable as part of the crust. However, for the Earth model, where also no graphite condenses in the atmosphere, all non-gaseous carbon is bound in $\rm {CaCO_3}$[s] and $\rm {CaMgC_{2}O_{6}}$[s]. The other element abundances have either one or a multitude of carbon-bearing condensates stable at the crust.

For PWD BSE (T surf < 700 K) and PWD MORB, the carbon condensates are $\rm {CaCO_3}$[s], $\rm {C}$[s] and $\rm {CaMgC_{2}O_{6}}$[s]. These condensates are also stable for the model with the highest C abundance (3.5% mfrac for the CI), but the further condensates of $\rm {MgCO_3}$[s], $\rm {NCO_3}$[s], $\rm {FeCO_3}$[s] and $\rm {CaFeC_{2}O_{6}}$ are also stable. The carbon abundance in BSE, BSE12, BSE15 and MORB is more than two orders of magnitude lower than for CI or the PWD models. This results in a much simpler carbon condensate phase, with either $\rm {C}$[s] or $\rm {CaCO_3}$[s] being stable for the corresponding models. Similarly for the CC element abundance, carbon is bound in the crust in the form of $\rm {CaMgC_{2}O_{6}}$[s] for T surf < 680 K.

Nitrogen

The nitrogen in the gas phase can be found in the forms of $\rm {N_2}$, $\rm {NH_3}$, $\rm {HNO_3}$ and $\rm {NO_2}$ and their distribution is shown in Fig. A5. While there are no N bearing condensates in the crust for any model, $\rm {NH_{4}Cl}$[s] and $\rm {NH_{4}SH}$[s] are thermally stable condensates in the atmospheres (see Fig. A3).

For many sets of element abundances, $\rm {N_2}$ is a main N carrier at concentrations over 1‰ for the entire investigated parameter space (BSE, CC, CI, Earth) or up to a certain threshold surface temperature (T surf < 450 K: BSE12, BSE15; T surf < 650 K: MORB, PWD BSE; T surf < 775 K: PWD MORB). Otherwise, for H-rich atmospheres, $\rm {NH_3}$ becomes the main N carrier for the entire parameter space of PWD CI, Archean and Solar, but also for T surf > 450 K BSE12, BSE15. For the latter two, the dominance of $\rm {N_2}$ over $\rm {NH_3}$ is only present, when $\rm {H_{2}O}$[l] is a stable crust condensate.

Although N is considered as an omnipresent gas species, we find the high atmosphere can be depleted in nitrogen for $T_{\rm surf}\gtrsim 550$ K and therefore higher surface pressures. The depletion of N is caused by the condensation of $\rm {NH_{4}Cl}$[s], which removes a considerable amount of N from the gas phase. This is the case for the the sets of total element abundances of BSE12, BSE15 and Archean. For MORB abundances, this temperature threshold is T surf > 725 K. The condensation of $\rm {NH_{4}Cl}$[s] is present in most models and coincides with the condensation of $\rm {H_{2}O}$[l]. Therefore, the $\rm {NH_{4}Cl}$[s] condensates are of additional interest for the discussion of habitability.

A further N condensate is $\rm {NH_{4}SH}$[s], which is only thermally stable for T gas < 250 K. This further depletes the N abundance for BSE12, BSE15, PWD MORB and PWD CI.

Sulphur

The most abundant sulphur bearing gas-phase molecule is $\rm {H_{2}S}$. Only for high T gas of CC and PWD BSE total element abundances $\rm {SO_2}$ become more significant than $\rm {H_{2}S}$, which remains present at concentrations of more than 10−6. Furthermore, traces of $\rm {COS}$, $\rm {S}$x, $\rm {S_{2}O}$ and $\rm {H_{2}SO_{4}}$ can be present. In general, for higher T surf a higher abundance of sulphur is found in our atmospheres (see also Fig. A6). The only model where no S bearing molecule is present at concentrations greater than 10−9 for T surf > 450 K is the Earth model, for which only $\rm {H_{2}SO_{4}}$ is present for T surf > 900 K. This significantly depleted S abundance with respect to all of the other models is a result of the thermal stability of S condensates in oxidized environments. The investigation of S in CHNO+S atmospheres is further discussed in detail in Janssen et al. (subm). For the CC model with 400 K < T surf < 800 K, the condensation of $\rm {S_2}$[s] is sufficient enough to reduce the S abundance for $T_{\rm gas}\lesssim 240$ K to below 10−9. For all models, with $T_{\rm surf}\gtrsim 450$ K $\rm {H_{2}S}$ is present with concentrations higher than 10−9 in the region of the $\rm {H_{2}O}$[l] cloud base.

For most of the element abundances, the majority of the sulphur is kept in the crust as condensates. This explains the higher concentration of sulphur bearing molecules with higher temperatures, as the vapour pressure of the condensates increases with increasing temperature. Only for BSE12, BSE15 and Archean total element abundances and T surf > 700 K no S condensate is stable at the crust. For most abundances and T surf only one S condensate is thermally stable. These stable condensates are $\rm {FeS}$ for BSE, MORB, PWD MORB, PWD CI (all T surf), BSE12, BSE15 (680 K < T surf < 440 K), CI (T surf > 510 K), Archean (T surf < 690 K), solar (T surf < 670 K); $\rm {FeS_2}$ for BSE12, BSE15 (T surf < 430 K), CC (T surf < 640 K), CI (T surf < 500 K), PWD BSE (T surf < 350 K); $\rm {CaSO_4}$[s] for CC (T surf > 650 K), Earth (all T surf) and $\rm {MnS}$ for solar (T surf > 680 K). The PWD BSE total element abundance is the only model, where multiple S condensates are stable for the same surface condition. These stable condensates are $\rm {FeS}$[s] and one of $\rm {CaSO_4}$[s] and $\rm {FeS_2}$[s] for T surf > 800 K and 350 K < T surf < 800 K, repetitively.

The sulphur-containing cloud condensates fall into three categories. First, at the highest temperatures, pure sulphur condensates of S2[s] and S[l] dominate. These can be present over a large range of surface conditions. In general, the $\rm {S_2}$[s] cloud base lies at lower pressures than the $\rm {H_{2}O}$[l] cloud bases. Second, $\rm {H_{2}SO_{4}}$[s], which is only stable for models with high pressures at the surface and cold local temperatures of $T_{\rm gas}\lesssim 300$ K. The $\rm {H_{2}SO_{4}}$[s] and $\rm {S_2}$[s] condensates can coexist in the one atmospheric model. Third, the $\rm {NH_{4}SH}$[s] condensate is only stable for $T_{\rm gas}\lesssim 250$ K. As $\rm {NH_{4}SH}$[s] does not coexist in an atmosphere with either $\rm {S_2}$[l], $\rm {S}$[l] or $\rm {H_{2}SO_{4}}$[s], these condensates could be used for the characterization of the atmospheric conditions.

Phosphorus

The rarest of the CHNOPS elements in our model atmospheres is phosphorus, which is for all non-solar total element abundances almost completely bound in the crust, in the form of hydroxyapatite and fluorapatite, $\rm {Ca_{5}P_{3}O_{13}H}$[s] and $\rm {Ca_{5}P_{3}O_{12}F}$[s], respectively. Apatite has been found to be the main phosphorus carrier for example on the Chelyabinsk meteorite (Walton et al., Reference Walton, Shorttle, Hu, Rae, Jianglong, Černok, Williams, Liu, Tang, Li and Anand2021). This shows that P will be a limiting element for the formation and evolution of life in the atmospheres of almost all rocky exoplanets.

Only models for solar element abundances and T surf > 900 K show any phosphorus-bearing molecule at concentrations higher than 10−9 in the atmosphere. At the crust–atmosphere interaction layer of these models, $\rm {PH_3}$ is the dominant P carrier, with about 3 orders of magnitude higher concentration than $\rm {P_{4}O_{6}}$. However, as virtually no Ca is present in the atmosphere, the remaining P cannot condense in the form of apatite and only condenses much higher in the atmosphere, when $\rm {H_{3}PO_{4}}$[s] becomes thermally stable at around p = 10−0.5 bar and T gas = 250 K. Despite the overall reducing atmospheric conditions in the $\rm {H_2}$ dominated atmosphere, the most important P carrier changes close to the surface at T gas ≈ 900 K from $\rm {PH_3}$ to $\rm {P_{4}O_{6}}$. This change from the reduced to the oxidized form is consistent with previous models (e.g. Lodders and Fegley, Reference Lodders and Fegley2002; Visscher et al., Reference Visscher, Lodders and Fegley2006).

Chlorine and fluorine

The only molecules which reach concentrations above 10−9 for T gas < 450 K and include further elements besides CHNOPS include the fluorine or chlorine. The gas phases in the relevant temperature regime are visualized in the Appendix in Figs. A7 and A8, respectively.

Most of the halides are condensed in the crust in the form of $\rm {NaCl}$[s] and $\rm {Ca_{5}P_{3}O_{12}F}$[s]. Additionally, $\rm {MgF_2}$[s] tends to be stable towards higher temperatures, whereas $\rm {CaF_2}$[s] is stable towards lower temperatures. Only for the CC total element abundances, the additional condensate of $\rm {KMg_{2}AlSi_{3}O_{10}F_{2}}$[s] is thermally stable at the crust for T surf > 370 K. The further condensate of $\rm {CaCl_2}$[s] is only found stable in the model of BSE12 total element abundances for T surf ≈ 590 K.

The halides show increasing gas-phase concentrations for high surface temperatures, where residual Cl and F atoms remain in the gas phase. The most important species being $\rm {HCl}$ and $\rm {HF}$ for all atmospheres. In the atmospheres at $T_{\rm gas}\gtrsim 700$ K, the condensation of $\rm {KCl}$[s] and $\rm {NaCl}$[s] occurs for every total element abundance. However, this condensation is limited by the abundance of K and Na, respectively. As a result, the concentration of $\rm {HCl}$ and $\rm {HF}$ reaches up to a few 10−3 in the atmospheres based on a high surface temperature. The presence of these hydrogen halides in coexistence with $\rm {H_{2}O}$[l] can result in acidic environments, if they dissolve in the water droplets. Whether this acidity benefits or limits the formation of pre-biotic molecules is beyond the scope of this paper and is therefore not included in the nutrient availability levels as either helpful or harmful.

$\rm {SiF_4}$ is the only CHNOPS bearing molecule present at concentrations higher than 10−9 in any model of our atmospheric models for T gas < 450 K. It is only present for the CC and Earth total element abundances and $T_{\rm surf}\gtrsim 900$ K.

Summary and discussion

In this paper, we defined nutrient availability levels based on the presence of water condensates and availability of nutrients. We used this concept to explore the potential for habitable atmospheres to form under equilibrium conditions in rocky exoplanets.

We find that for most atmospheres at (p gas,  T gas) points, where liquid water is stable, CNS bearing molecules are present at concentrations above 10−9. Carbon is generally present in every atmosphere, while the sulphur availability in the gas phase increases with increasing T surf. For lower T surf nitrogen in the form of either $\rm {NH_3}$ or $\rm {N_2}$ is present as a major contributor to the atmospheric composition for most atmospheres. However, for models with higher T surf, the presence of gaseous nitrogen can be significantly depleted by the condensation of $\rm {NH_{4}Cl}$[s], which leaves an upper atmosphere devoid of nitrogen. The limiting element of the CHNOPS elements is phosphorus, which is mostly bound in the planetary crust. This is consistent with the scarcity of phosphorus limiting the biosphere during at least some parts of Earth history (Syverson et al., Reference Syverson, Reinhard, Isson, Holstege, Katchinoff, Tutolo, Etschmann, Brugger and Planavsky2021).

Implications for surface biospheres

Similar to previous work, our models suggest that the limiting factor for habitability at the surface of a planet is the presence of liquid water. If water is present at the surface, CNS are available in the gas phase of the near-crust atmosphere. The only exception is the present day Earth model, which lacks the presence of gaseous S by construction.

The available elements for the equilibration of crust and atmosphere are dependent on the overall planetary composition and therefore formation history, as well as the tectonic regimes present (e.g. Tosi et al., Reference Tosi, Godolt, Stracke, Ruedas, Grenfell, Höning, Nikolaou, Plesa, Breuer and Spohn2017; Dorn et al., Reference Dorn, Noack and Rozel2018; Kruijver et al., Reference Kruijver, Höning and van Westrenen2021; Meier et al., Reference Meier, Bower, Lichtenberg, Tackley and Demory2021; Höning et al., Reference Höning, Baumeister, Grenfell, Tosi and Way2021). The evolution of a planet and its start also play a crucial role, as this determines the long-term temperature of the planet (Turbet et al., Reference Turbet, Bolmont, Chaverot, Ehrenreich, Leconte and Marcq2021; Seales and Lenardic, Reference Seales and Lenardic2021). The formation of hydrated minerals can also play an important role in the long-term stability of water condensates (Herbort et al., Reference Herbort, Woitke, Helling and Zerkle2020; Beck et al., Reference Beck, Eschrig, Potin, Prestgard, Bonal, Quirico and Schmitt2021). An example for this is the surface of Mars, which previously hosted liquid water, which is now bound in hydrated rocks (see e.g. Ehlmann et al., Reference Ehlmann, Mustard and Murchie2010; Wernicke and Jakosky, Reference Wernicke and Jakosky2021).

Even if (p surf,  T surf) of a planet allow the formation of liquid water and water is present in the atmosphere, even in the form of clouds, our models show that no water ocean is to be implied from these (compare also Ding and Wordsworth, Reference Ding and Wordsworth2022). Especially if the surface pressure is not well constrained, the presence of water clouds is not conclusive for the presence of water at the surface of the respective planet. Therefore, additional detection methods of a surface ocean are necessary to confirm the existence (e.g. Williams and Gaidos, Reference Williams and Gaidos2008; Lustig-Yaeger et al., Reference Lustig-Yaeger, Meadows, Tovar Mendoza, Schwieterman, Fujii, Luger and Robinson2018; Ryan and Robinson, Reference Ryan and Robinson2022)

If water is available at the surface, the elements not present in the gas phase are stored in the crust condensates. Processes such as chemical weathering or dissolution of condensates into water can make these elements available for life. This provides a pathway to overcome the lack of atmospheric phosphorus and metals, which are used in enzymes that drive many biological processes. However, there can be the difficulty in accumulating the pre-biotic molecules, if the water reservoir is too large and no exposed land is available (Noack et al., Reference Noack, Höning, Rivoldini, Heistracher, Zimov, Journaux, Lammer, Van Hoolst and Bredehöft2016). This leads to Darwin's idea of the warm little pond with some dry–wet cycles (Follmann and Brownson, Reference Follmann and Brownson2009; Pearce et al., Reference Pearce, Pudritz, Semenov and Henning2017). This hurdle also needs to be overcome for potential life on the icy moons in our solar system (see e.g. Vance et al., Reference Vance, Harnmeijer, Kimura, Hussmann, DeMartin and Brown2007; Tjoa et al., Reference Tjoa, Mueller and Van Der Tak2020; Taubner et al., Reference Taubner, Olsson-Francis, Vance, Ramkissoon, Postberg, de Vera, Antunes, Camprubi Casas, Sekine, Noack, Barge, Goodman, Jebbar, Journaux, Karatekin, Klenner, Rabbow, Rettberg, Rückriemen-Bez, Saur, Shibuya and Soderlund2020). If indeed it can be shown that life can form in a water ocean without any exposed land, this constraint becomes weaker and the potential for the surface habitability becomes mainly a question of water stability.

Implications for aerial biospheres

Many of the models show the presence of a liquid water zone in the atmospheres, which is detached from the surface. These regions could be of interest for the formation of life in the forms of aerial biospheres.

Previous work by, for example, Seager et al. (Reference Seager, Petkowski, Günther, Bains, Mikal-Evans and Deming2021b) focussing on sub Neptunes – which have thicker atmospheres than planets investigated in this work – has shown that aerial biospheres can be regions of nutrient scarcity. We show that some of the fundamental elements (CHNOS) are likely to occur in regions of most planetary atmospheres. These elements are mostly in a reduced state near the water cloud base, which is favourable for the formation of pre-biotic molecules. However, our models also show that phosphorus is unlikely to occur in planetary atmospheres, as it is bound in the crust in the form of apatite. A further hurdle for more complex life is the ability to use redox-sensitive transition metals as cofactors in enzymes. Our models show these metals are also absent in most atmospheres, as they are bound in the crust. Further cloud condensates to $\rm {H_{2}O}$[l,s] like $\rm {NH_{4}Cl}$[s] could play this role for life in such environments (see Seager et al., Reference Seager, Petkowski, Günther, Bains, Mikal-Evans and Deming2021b). Our models show that these two cloud condensates coexist for most atmospheric models.

The lacking atoms of phosphorus and metals could in principle be provided by atmospheric updrafts induced by storms on the planet. The closer the liquid water zone is to the surface, the more likely an updraft of surface material would be. However, further cloud layers are expected at higher temperatures on planets with higher surface pressure (e.g. $\rm {NaCl}$[s], $\rm {KCl}$[s], $\rm {FeS}$[s] or $\rm {FeS_2}$[s]). These condensates could be delivered to the higher atmospheres by storms and accumulated by life in the higher atmosphere.

Implications for atmospheric biosignatures

The atmospheric composition in this work focussed on the pre-biotic atmospheric composition. The atmospheric composition after the emergence of life on a planet can deviate drastically from the pre-biotic atmospheric composition caused by biological activity itself (e.g. Holland, Reference Holland2002; Izon et al., Reference Izon, Zerkle, Williford, Farquhar, Poultone and Claire2017; Gregory et al., Reference Gregory, Claire and Rugheimer2021). Our approach does not directly aim for the understanding of biosignatures and atmospheres of planets, which are inhabited, but for the conditions in which pre-biotic chemistry can occur.

The results of our approach of a large variety of different atmospheric compositions in chemical equilibrium atmospheres can provide insights to which signatures of biology could also be produced by a simple chemical equilibrium atmosphere. We, for example, show that $\rm {N_2}$ is a major atmospheric component for planets with T surf < 400 K, whereas $\rm {N}$ in general can be lacking in atmospheres based on higher T surf. Lammer et al. (Reference Lammer, Sproß, Grenfell, Scherf, Fossati, Lendl and Cubillos2019) state that $\rm {N_2}$ itself can be a sign of a biosignature or effective tectonic regimes. Our models of an equilibrated crust with the atmosphere can be seen as representative of active tectonic regimes as otherwise only a small portion of the crust is able to equilibrate with the atmosphere. Following up on this, Sproß et al. (Reference Sproß, Scherf, Shematovich, Bisikalo and Lammer2021) state that the coexistence of $\rm {N_2}$ and $\rm {O_2}$ is only a result of biology. We find that this coexistence – as well as the presence of $\rm {O_2}$ in general – is only possible in a model with element abundances adopted to produce this exact atmospheric feature.

Another pair of atmospheric gas species that is discussed as a biosignature is $\rm {CO_2}$ and $\rm {CH_4}$ (e.g. Krissansen-Totton et al., Reference Krissansen-Totton, Arney, Catling, Felton, Fortney, Garland, Irwin, Kopparapu, Lehmer, Lustig-Yaeger, Meadows, Molaverdikhani, Olson, Schwieterman and Taylor2019; Wogan et al., Reference Wogan, Krissansen-Totton and Catling2020; Mikal-Evans, Reference Mikal-Evans2021). However, as discussed in Woitke et al. (Reference Woitke, Herbort, Helling, Stüeken, Dominik, Barth and Samra2021), it is possible to have these two molecules coexist in chemical equilibrium. In our atmospheres, we find this element pair coexisting at concentrations above 10−6 for many atmospheres with T gas > 275 K. For a concentration greater than 1‰ of both, $\rm {CO_2}$ and $\rm {CH_4}$, T gas > 350 K is necessary. Therefore, high concentrations of both molecules at cool temperatures could be explained by some out-of-equilibrium process such at biology. In the early Earth atmosphere during the Archean, the methane has been a product of biology (methanogenesis Ueno et al., Reference Ueno, Yamada, Yoshida, Maruyama and Isozaki2006). Similarly, it has been discussed that the presence of $\rm {CH_4}$ in plumes of Enceladus could potentially be a result of methanogenesis (Affholder et al., Reference Affholder, Guyot, Sauterey, Ferrière and Mazevet2021).

$\rm {HCN}$ has been found, for example, on the surface of Titan (Lellouch et al., Reference Lellouch, Gurwell, Butler, Fouchet, Lavvas, Strobel, Sicardy, Moullet, Moreno, Bockelée-Morvan, Biver, Young, Lis, Stansberry, Stern, Weaver, Young, Zhu and Boissier2017) and the comet Hale-Bopp (Jewitt et al., Reference Jewitt, Matthews, Owen and Meier1997). Its production in planetary atmosphere is possible by lightning, especially if $\rm {CH_4}$ and $\rm {N_2}$ are present (Hodosan et al., Reference Hodosan, Helling and Rimmer2017; Pearce et al., Reference Pearce, Molaverdikhani, Pudritz, Henning and Cerrillo2022). However, we do not find the presence of $\rm {HCN}$ in any of our models, underlining their non-equilibrium origin. With the presence of $\rm {HCN}$, Rimmer et al. (Reference Rimmer, Majumdar, Priyadarshi, Wright and Yurchenko2021) found that the production of $\rm {HC_{3}N}$ should occur on super-Earths rich in nitrogen and an overall reduced atmospheric composition by photochemistry.

Further molecules that we do not find to be present in any of our models are more complex hydrocarbons than $\rm {CH_4}$. However, these have been found in various environments ranging from interstellar matter (e.g. Henning and Salama, Reference Henning and Salama1998) to places in our solar system. Examples are the $\rm {C_{2}H_{4}}$ haze on Triton (Ohno et al., Reference Ohno, Zhang, Tazaki and Okuzumi2021) or various different molecules on comets such as 67P (Müller et al., Reference Müller, Altwegg, Berthelier, Combi, De Keyser, Fuselier, Hänni, Pestoni, Rubin, Schroeder and Wampfler2022).

Huang et al. (Reference Huang, Seager, Petkowski, Ranjan and Zhan2021) found that the detection of $\rm {NH_3}$ can be a biosignature on planets, where a deep atmosphere is excluded. We however find, that $\rm {NH_3}$ can be present throughout the atmosphere of uninhabited planets with low pressure atmospheres. However, only if no water condensate is stable at the surface, we find that the $\rm {NH_3}$ concentration actually exceeds 1‰. The reason for this difference can be that there is no photochemistry included in our model. Species such as $\rm {NH_3}$ and $\rm {CH_4}$ can be easily photodissociated, resulting in a significantly lower concentrations and the production of hazes.

By construction of the model, the influence of stellar irradiation to the planetary atmosphere is not discussed. A proper understanding of the influence of the host star to the atmosphere requires the upper atmosphere and is therefore beyond the scope of this paper. This can have a major factor for the atmospheric evolution (Chen et al., Reference Chen, Zhan, Youngblood, Wolf, Feinstein and Horton2020; Turbet and Selsis, Reference Turbet and Selsis2021; Chebly et al., Reference Chebly, Alvarado-Gómez and Poppenhaeger2021; Locci et al., Reference Locci, Petralia, Micela, Maggio, Ciaravella and Cecchi-Pestellini2022; Teal et al., Reference Teal, Kempton, Bastelberger, Youngblood and Arney2022). The triggered photochemistry can not only destroy pre-biotic molecules, but also enhance the formation of these as many reactions need the input of some sort of energy, this can for example be provided by the stellar irradiation (in the form of UV radiation) or lightning discharges. Whether the strong UV radiation during flares of M dwarfs is harmful for the evolution of life has been a matter of discussion (Shields et al., Reference Shields, Ballard and Johnson2016; O'Malley-James and Kaltenegger, Reference O'Malley-James and Kaltenegger2019).

Conclusions

The formation of life does not only require the presence of liquid water, but also nutrients, especially in the form of the elements CNS. This paper investigates the presence of these elements in aerial environments where water condensates are present. Therefore, we have introduced a new framework to extend the concept of habitability from the presence of liquid water to also include the presence and availability of nutrients. This new system of different nutrient availability levels includes the presence of water condensates and how many nutrients based on carbon, nitrogen and sulphur are available.

The application of these nutrient availability levels to 1D equilibrium chemistry atmospheric models which include the element depletion due to cloud formation shows that all three elements (CNS) are commonly present at the water cloud base. Our models also show that phosphorus is not commonly present in the atmosphere and could therefore be a limiting nutrient for the formation of life.

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/S1473550424000077

Acknowledgements

OH acknowledges the ARIEL fellowship of the University of Vienna, the Ph.D stipend form the University of St Andrews’ Centre for Exoplanet Science, financial support from the Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften (OeAW).

Financial support

P. W. and C. H. received funding from the European Union H2020-MSCA-ITN-2019 under Grant Agreement No. 860470 (CHAMELEON).

Competing interest

None.

References

Affholder, A, Guyot, F, Sauterey, B, Ferrière, R and Mazevet, S (2021) Bayesian analysis of Enceladus's plume data to assess methanogenesis. Nature Astronomy 5, 805814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, LA and Sarmiento, JL (1994) Redfield ratios of remineralization determined by nutrient data analysis. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 8, 6580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arevalo, R and McDonough, WF (2010) Chemical variations and regional diversity observed in MORB. Chemical Geology 271, 7085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asplund, M, Grevesse, N, Sauval, AJ and Scott, P (2009) The chemical composition of the sun. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 47, 481522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, R, Helling, Ch, Hodosán, G, Bilger, C and Stark, C (2014) Ionization in atmospheres of brown dwarfs and extrasolar planets VI: properties of large-scale discharge events. Astrophysical Journal 784, 43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bains, W, Petkowski, JJ, Seager, S, Ranjan, S, Sousa-Silva, C, Rimmer, PB, Zhan, Z, Greaves, JS and Richards, AM (2021) Phosphine on Venus cannot be explained by conventional processes. Astrobiology 21, 12771304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bains, W, Shorttle, O, Ranjan, S, Rimmer, PB, Petkowski, JJ, Greaves, JS and Seager, S (2022) Constraints on the production of phosphine by Venusian volcanoes. Universe 8, 54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ballesteros, F, Fernandez-Soto, A and Martínez, V (2019) Diving into exoplanets: are water seas the most common?. Astrobiology 19, 642654.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barth, P, Helling, C, Stüeken, E, Bourrier, V, Mayne, N, Rimmer, P, Jardine, M, Vidotto, A, Wheatley, P and Fares, R (2021) MOVES - IV. Modelling the influence of stellar XUV-flux, cosmic rays, and stellar energetic particles on the atmospheric composition of the hot Jupiter HD 189733b. Monthly Notices of the RAS 502, 62016215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, P, Eschrig, J, Potin, S, Prestgard, T, Bonal, L, Quirico, E and Schmitt, B (2021) Water abundance at the surface of C-complex main-belt asteroids. Icarus 357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benneke, B, Wong, I, Piaulet, C, Knutson, HA, Lothringer, J, Morley, CV, Crossfield, IJM, Gao, P, Greene, TP, Dressing, C, Dragomir, D, Howard, AW, McCullough, PR, Kempton, EM-R, Fortney, JJ, Fraine, J (2019) Water vapor and clouds on the habitable-zone sub-Neptune exoplanet K2-18b. The Astrophysical Journal 887, L14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burris, RH and Wilson, PW (1945) Biological nitrogen fixation. Annual Review of Biochemistry 14, 685708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catling, DC, Krissansen-Totton, J, Kiang, NY, Crisp, D, Robinson, TD, Dassarma, S, Rushby, AJ, Del Genio, A, Bains, W and Domagal-Goldman, S (2018) Exoplanet biosignatures: a framework for their assessment. Astrobiology 18, 709738.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Charnay, B, Blain, D, Bézard, B, Leconte, J, Turbet, M and Falco, A (2021) Formation and dynamics of water clouds on temperate sub-Neptunes: the example of K2-18b. Astronomy and Astrophysics 646, A171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chebly, JJ, Alvarado-Gómez, JD and Poppenhaeger, K (2021) Destination exoplanet: habitability conditions influenced by stellar winds properties. Astronomische Nachrichten.Google Scholar
Chen, H, Zhan, Z, Youngblood, A, Wolf, ET, Feinstein, AD and Horton, DE (2020) Persistence of flare-driven atmospheric chemistry on rocky habitable zone worlds. Nature Astronomy 5, 298310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dartnell, LR, Nordheim, TA, Patel, MR, Mason, JP, Coates, AJ, Jones, GH (2015) Constraints on a potential aerial biosphere on Venus: I. Cosmic rays. Icarus 257, 396405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deamer, D, Cary, F and Damer, B (2022) Urability: a property of planetary bodies that can support an origin of life. Astrobiology 22, 889900.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ding, F and Wordsworth, RD (2022) Prospects for water vapor detection in the atmospheres of temperate and arid rocky exoplanets around M-dwarf stars. arXiv e-prints p. arXiv:2201.08423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorn, C, Noack, L and Rozel, A (2018) Outgassing on stagnant-lid super-Earths. Astronomy and Astrophysics 614, A18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehlmann, B, Mustard, J and Murchie, S (2010) Geologic setting of serpentine deposits on Mars. Geophysics Research Letters 37, L06201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fegley, B, Zolotov, MY and Lodders, K (1997) The oxidation state of the lower atmosphere and surface of Venus. Icarus 125, 416439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferris, JP, Joshi, PC, Edelson, EH and Lawless, JG (1978) HCN: a plausible source of purines, pyrimidines and amino acids on the primitive earth. Journal of Molecular Evolution 11, 293311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferus, M, Kubelík, P, Kníek, A, Pastorek, A, Sutherland, J and Civis, S (2017) High energy radical chemistry formation of HCN-rich atmospheres on early Earth. Scientific Reports 7, 6275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Follmann, H and Brownson, C (2009) Darwin's warm little pond revisited: from molecules to the origin of life. Die Naturwissenschaften 96, 12651292.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilmozzi, R and Spyromilio, J (2007) The European extremely large telescope (E-ELT). The Messenger 127, 11.Google Scholar
Greaves, JS, Richards, AM, Bains, W, Rimmer, PB, Sagawa, H, Clements, DL, Seager, S, Petkowski, JJ, Sousa-Silva, C, Ranjan, S, Drabek-Maunder, E, Fraser, HJ, Cartwright, A, Mueller-Wodarg, I, Zhan, Z, Friberg, P, Coulson, I, Lee, E and Hoge, J (2021) Phosphine gas in the cloud decks of Venus. Nature Astronomy 5, 655664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, BS, Claire, MW and Rugheimer, S (2021) Photochemical modelling of atmospheric oxygen levels confirms two stable states. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 561, 116818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grenfell, JL, Leconte, J, Forget, F, Godolt, M, Carrión-González, Ó, Noack, L, Tian, F, Rauer, H, Gaillard, F, Bolmont, É, Charnay, B and Turbet, M (2020) Possible atmospheric diversity of low mass exoplanets – some central aspects. Space Science Reviews 216, 98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallsworth, JE, Koop, T, Dallas, TD, Zorzano, M-P, Burkhardt, J, Golyshina, OV, Martín-Torres, J, Dymond, MK, Ball, P and McKay, CP (2021) Water activity in Venus's uninhabitable clouds and other planetary atmospheres. Nature Astronomy 5, 665675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henning, Th. and Salama, F (1998) Carbon in the Universe. Science 282, 22042210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herbort, O, Woitke, P, Helling, C and Zerkle, A (2020) The atmospheres of rocky exoplanets: I. Outgassing of common rock and the stability of liquid water. Astronomy and Astrophysics 636, A71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herbort, O, Woitke, P, Helling, Ch. and Zerkle, AL (2022) The atmospheres of rocky exoplanets – II. Influence of surface composition on the diversity of cloud condensates. Astronomy and Astrophysics 658, A180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ho, T-Y, Quigg, A, Finkel, ZV, Milligan, AJ, Wyman, K, Falkowski, PG and Morel, FMM (2003) The elemental composition of some marine phytoplankton1. Journal of Phycology 39, 11451159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodosan, G, Helling, Ch and Rimmer, P (2017) Exo-lightning radio emission: the case study of HAT-P-11b. In Fischer G, Mann G, Panchenko M, Zarka P (eds), Planetary Radio Emissions VIII Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop held at Seggauberg. Vienna: Austrian Academy of Sciences Press, pp. 345–356.Google Scholar
Hoehler, TM (2007) An energy balance concept for habitability. Astrobiology 7, 824838.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holland, HD (2002) Volcanic gases, black smokers, and the great oxidation event. Geochimica Cosmochimica Acta 66, 38113826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Höning, D, Baumeister, P, Grenfell, JL, Tosi, N and Way, MJ (2021) Early habitability and crustal decarbonation of a stagnant-lid Venus. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets 126, e06895.Google Scholar
Horneck, G, Walter, N, Westall, F, Grenfell, JL, Martin, WF, Gomez, F, Leuko, S, Lee, N, Onofri, S, Tsiganis, K, Saladino, R, Pilat-Lohinger, E, Palomba, E, Harrison, J, Rull, F, Muller, C, Strazzulla, G, Brucato, JR, Rettberg, P and Capria, MT (2016) AstRoMap European astrobiology roadmap. Astrobiology 16, 201243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huang, J, Seager, S, Petkowski, JJ, Ranjan, S and Zhan, Z (2021) Assessment of ammonia as a biosignature gas in exoplanet atmospheres. arXiv e-prints p. arXiv:2107.12424.Google Scholar
Huang, S-S (1959) Occurrence of life in the universe. American Scientist 47, 397402.Google Scholar
Ih, J, Kempton, EMR, Whittaker, EA and Lessard, M (2023) Constraining the thickness of TRAPPIST-1 b's atmosphere from its JWST secondary eclipse observation at 15 μm. The Astrophysical Journal 952, L4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ito, Y, Changeat, Q, Edwards, B, Al-Refaie, A, Tinetti, G and Ikoma, M (2021) Detectability of rocky-vapour atmospheres on super-Earths with Ariel. Experimental Astronomy 53, 357374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Izon, G, Zerkle, AL, Williford, KH, Farquhar, J, Poultone, SW and Claire, MW (2017) Biological regulation of atmospheric chemistry en route to planetary oxygenation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 114, E2571E2579.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jewitt, D, Matthews, H, Owen, T and Meier, R (1997) The 12C/13C, 14N/15N and 32S/ 34S isotope ratios in comet Hale-Bopp (C/1995 O1). Science 278, 9093.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kasting, JF, Whitmire, DP and Reynolds, RT (1993) Habitable zones around main sequence stars. Icarus 101, 108128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kotsyurbenko, OR, Cordova, JA, Belov, AA, Cheptsov, VS, Kölbl, D, Khrunyk, YY, Kryuchkova, MO, Milojevic, T, Mogul, R, Sasaki, S, Słowik, GP, Snytnikov, V and Vorobyova, EA (2021) Exobiology of the Venusian clouds: new insights into habitability through terrestrial models and methods of detection. Astrobiology 21, 11861205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krissansen-Totton, J, Arney, GN, Catling, DC, Felton, R, Fortney, J, Garland, R, Irwin, P, Kopparapu, R, Lehmer, O, Lustig-Yaeger, J, Meadows, V, Molaverdikhani, K, Olson, S, Schwieterman, EW and Taylor, J (2019) Atmospheric disequilibrium as an exoplanet biosignature: opportunities for next generation telescopes. Bulletin of the AAS 51, 158.Google Scholar
Kruijver, A, Höning, D and van Westrenen, W (2021) Carbon cycling and habitability of massive Earth-like exoplanets. The Planetary Science Journal 2, 208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lammer, H, Sproß, L, Grenfell, JL, Scherf, M, Fossati, L, Lendl, M and Cubillos, PE (2019) The role of N2 as a geo-biosignature for the detection and characterization of Earth-like habitats. Astrobiology 19, 927950.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lammer, H, Zerkle, A, Gebauer, S, Tosi, N, Noack, L, Scherf, M, Pilat-Lohinger, E, Güdel, M, Grenfell, J, Godolt, M and Nikolaou, A (2018) Origin and evolution of the atmospheres of early Venus, Earth and Mars. Astronomy and Astrophysics Reviews 26, 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leconte, J, Forget, F and Lammer, H (2015) On the (anticipated) diversity of terrestrial planet atmospheres. Experimental Astronomy 40, 449467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lellouch, E, Gurwell, M, Butler, B, Fouchet, T, Lavvas, P, Strobel, D, Sicardy, B, Moullet, A, Moreno, R, Bockelée-Morvan, D, Biver, N, Young, L, Lis, D, Stansberry, J, Stern, A, Weaver, H, Young, E, Zhu, X, Boissier, J (2017) Detection of CO and HCN in Pluto's atmosphere with ALMA. Icarus 286, 289307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lisse, CM, Desch, SJ, Unterborn, CT, Kane, SR, Young, PR, Hartnett, HE, Hinkel, NR, Shim, S -H, Mamajek, EE and Izenberg, NR (2020) A geologically robust procedure for observing rocky exoplanets to ensure that detection of atmospheric oxygen is a modern Earth-like biosignature. The Astrophysical Journal 898, L17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locci, D, Petralia, A, Micela, G, Maggio, A, Ciaravella, A and Cecchi-Pestellini, C (2022) Extreme-ultraviolet- and X-Ray-driven photochemistry of gaseous exoplanets. The Planetary Science Journal 3, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodders, K and Fegley, B (2002) Atmospheric chemistry in giant planets, brown dwarfs, and low-mass dwarf stars. I. Carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen. Icarus 155, 393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodders, K, Palme, H and Gail, HP (2009) Abundances of the elements in the solar system. Landolt Börnstein 4B, 712.Google Scholar
Lopez-Morales, M, Currie, T, Teske, J, Gaidos, E, Kempton, E, Males, J, Lewis, N, Rackham, BV, Ben-Ami, S, Birkby, J, Charbonneau, D, Close, L, Crane, J, Dressing, C, Froning, C, Hasegawa, Y, Konopacky, Q, Kopparapu, RK, Mawet, D, Mennesson, B, Ramirez, R, Stelter, D, Szentgyorgyi, A, Wang, J, Alam, M, Collins, K, Dupree, A, Karovska, M, Kirk, J, Levi, A, McGruder, C, Packman, C, Rugheimer, S and Rukdee, S (2019) Detecting Earth-like biosignatures on rocky exoplanets around nearby stars with ground-based extremely large telescopes. Bulletin of the AAS 51, 162.Google Scholar
Lustig-Yaeger, J, Meadows, VS, Tovar Mendoza, G, Schwieterman, EW, Fujii, Y, Luger, R and Robinson, TD (2018) Detecting ocean glint on exoplanets using multiphase mapping. Astronomical Journal 156, 301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, T, Rogers, K, Krishnamurthy, R, Williams, L, Marchi, S, Schwieterman, E, Trail, D, Planavsky, N and Reinhard, C (2021) Constraining prebiotic chemistry through a better understanding of Earth's earliest environments. Bulletin of the AAS 53, 143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madhusudhan, N, Piette, AA and Constantinou, S (2021) Habitability and biosignatures of Hycean worlds. Astrophysical Journal 918, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mang, J, Gao, P, Hood, CE, Fortney, JJ, Batalha, N, Yu, X and de Pater, I (2022) Microphysics of water clouds in the atmospheres of Y dwarfs and temperate giant planets. arXiv e-prints p. arXiv:2202.01355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meadows, VS, Reinhard, CT, Arney, GN, Parenteau, MN, Schwieterman, EW, Domagal-Goldman, SD, Lincowski, AP, Stapelfeldt, KR, Rauer, H and DasSarma, S (2018) Exoplanet biosignatures: understanding oxygen as a biosignature in the context of its environment. Astrobiology 18, 630662.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meier, TG, Bower, DJ, Lichtenberg, T, Tackley, PJ and Demory, B-O (2021) Hemispheric tectonics on LHS 3844b. Astrophysical Journal, Letters 908, L48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikal-Evans, T (2021) Detecting the proposed CH4–CO2 biosignature pair with the James Webb Space Telescope : TRAPPIST-1e and the effect of cloud/haze. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 510, 980991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melis, C and Dufour, P (2016) Does a differentiated, carbonate-rich, rocky object pollute the white dwarf SDSS J104341.53+085558.2?. The Astrophysical Journal 834, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, SL (1953) A production of amino acids under possible primitive Earth conditions. Science 117, 528529.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, SL and Urey, HC (1959) Organic compound synthesis on the primitive Earth. Science 130, 245251.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moran, SE, Stevenson, KB, Sing, DK, MacDonald, RJ, Kirk, J, Lustig-Yaeger, J, Peacock, S, Mayorga, LC, Bennett, KA, López-Morales, M, May, EM, Rustamkulov, Z, Valenti, JA, Adams Redai, JI, Alam, MK, Batalha, NE, Fu, G, Gonzalez-Quiles, J, Highland, AN, Kruse, E, Lothringer, JD, Ortiz Ceballos, KN, Sotzen, KS and Wakeford, HR (2023) High tide or riptide on the cosmic shoreline? A water-rich atmosphere or stellar contamination for the warm super-Earth GJ 486b from JWST observations. The Astrophysical Journal 948, L11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morowitz, H and Sagan, C (1967) Life in the clouds of Venus?. Nature 215, 12591260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, DR, Altwegg, K, Berthelier, J-J, Combi, MR, De Keyser, J, Fuselier, S, Hänni, N, Pestoni, B, Rubin, M, Schroeder, IR, Wampfler, SF (2022) High D/H ratios in water and alkanes in comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko measured with the Rosetta/ROSINA DFMS. arXiv e-prints p. arXiv:2202.03521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noack, L, Höning, D, Rivoldini, A, Heistracher, C, Zimov, N, Journaux, B, Lammer, H, Van Hoolst, T and Bredehöft, JH (2016) Water-rich planets: how habitable is a water layer deeper than on Earth?. Icarus 277, 215236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohno, K, Zhang, X, Tazaki, R and Okuzumi, S (2021) Haze formation on Triton. The Astrophysical Journal 912, 37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Malley-James, JT and Kaltenegger, L (2019) Lessons from early Earth: UV surface radiation should not limit the habitability of active M star systems. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 485, 55985603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Omran, A, Oze, C, Jackson, B, Mehta, C, Barge, LM, Bada, J and Pasek, MA (2021) Phosphine generation pathways on Rocky planets. Astrobiology 21, 12641276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parker, ET, Cleaves, HJ, Callahan, MP, Dworkin, JP, Glavin, DP, Lazcano, A and Bada, JL (2011) Enhanced synthesis of Alkyl Amino acids in Miller's 1958 H2S experiment. Origins of Life and Evolution of the Biosphere 41, 569574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patel, M, Mason, J, Nordheim, T and Dartnell, L (2022) Constraints on a potential aerial biosphere on Venus: II. Ultraviolet radiation. Icarus 373, 114796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearce, BKD, Molaverdikhani, K, Pudritz, RE, Henning, T and Cerrillo, KE (2022) Toward RNA life on early Earth: from atmospheric HCN to biomolecule production in warm little ponds. The Astrophysical Journal 932, 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearce, BK, Pudritz, RE, Semenov, DA and Henning, TK (2017) Origin of the RNA world: the fate of nucleobases in warm little ponds. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 114, 1132711332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramirez, RM (2020) A complex life habitable zone based on lipid solubility theory. Scientific Reports 10, 7432.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ranjan, S, Kufner, CL, Lozano, GG, Todd, ZR, Haseki, A and Sasselov, DD (2021) UV transmission in natural waters on prebiotic Earth. arXiv e-prints p. arXiv:2110.00432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redfield, AC (1934) On the proportions of organic derivations in sea water and their relation to the composition of plankton. In James Johnstone Memorial Volume. Liverpool: University Press of Liverpool, pp. 177192.Google Scholar
Rimmer, PB, Jordan, S, Constantinou, T, Woitke, P, Shorttle, O, Hobbs, R and Paschodimas, A (2021) Hydroxide salts in the clouds of Venus: their effect on the sulfur cycle and cloud droplet pH. Planetary Science Journal 2, 133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rimmer, PB, Majumdar, L, Priyadarshi, A, Wright, S and Yurchenko, S (2021) Detectable abundance of cyanoacetylene (HC3N) predicted on reduced nitrogen-rich super-Earth atmospheres. Astrophysical Journal, Letters 921, L28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, DJ and Robinson, TD (2022) Detecting oceans on exoplanets with phase-dependent spectral principal component analysis. The Planetary Science Journal 3, 33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaefer, L, Lodders, K and Fegley, B (2012) Vaporization of the Earth: application to exoplanet atmospheres. Astrophysical Journal 755, 41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seager, S, Petkowski, JJ, Gao, P, Bains, W, Bryan, NC, Ranjan, S and Greaves, J (2021) The Venusian lower atmosphere haze as a depot for desiccated microbial life: a proposed life cycle for persistence of the Venusian aerial biosphere. Astrobiology 21, 12061223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seager, S, Petkowski, JJ, Günther, MN, Bains, W, Mikal-Evans, T and Deming, D (2021) Possibilities for an aerial biosphere in temperate sub Neptune-sized exoplanet atmospheres. Universe 7, 172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seales, J and Lenardic, A (2021) A note on planet size and cooling rate. Icarus 367, 114560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shields, AL, Ballard, S and Johnson, JA (2016) The habitability of planets orbiting M-dwarf stars. Physics Reports 663, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sproß, L, Scherf, M, Shematovich, VI, Bisikalo, DV and Lammer, H (2021) Life as the only reason for the existence of N2–O2-dominated atmospheres. Astronomy Reports 65, 275296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stüeken, EE (2016) Nitrogen in ancient mud: a biosignature?. Astrobiology 16, 730735.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Syverson, D, Reinhard, C, Isson, T, Holstege, C, Katchinoff, J, Tutolo, B, Etschmann, B, Brugger, J and Planavsky, N (2021) Nutrient supply to planetary biospheres from anoxic weathering of mafic oceanic crust. Geophysics Research Letters 48, e94442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taubner, R-S, Olsson-Francis, K, Vance, SD, Ramkissoon, NK, Postberg, F, de Vera, J-P, Antunes, A, Camprubi Casas, E, Sekine, Y, Noack, L, Barge, L, Goodman, J, Jebbar, M, Journaux, B, Karatekin, Ö., Klenner, F, Rabbow, E, Rettberg, P, Rückriemen-Bez, T, Saur, J, Shibuya, T and Soderlund, KM (2020) Experimental and simulation efforts in the astrobiological exploration of exooceans. Space Science Reviews 216, 9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Teal, D, Kempton, EMR, Bastelberger, S, Youngblood, A and Arney, G (2022) Effects of UV stellar spectral uncertainty on the chemistry of terrestrial atmospheres. arXiv e-prints p. arXiv:2201.08805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tinetti, G, Drossart, P, Eccleston, P, Hartogh, P, Heske, A, Leconte, J, Micela, G, Ollivier, M, Pilbratt, G, Puig, L, Turrini, D, Vandenbussche, B, Wolkenberg, P, Beaulieu, J-P, Buchave, LA, Ferus, M, Griffin, M, Guedel, M, Justtanont, K, Lagage, P-O, Machado, P, Malaguti, G, Min, M, Nørgaard-Nielsen, HU, Rataj, M, Ray, T, Ribas, I, Swain, M, Szabo, R, Werner, S, Barstow, J, Burleigh, M, Cho, J, Coudé du Foresto, V, Coustenis, A, Decin, L, Encrenaz, T, Galand, M, Gillon, M, Helled, R, Morales, JC, García Muñoz, A, Moneti, A, Pagano, I, Pascale, E, Piccioni, G, Pinfield, D, Sarkar, S, Selsis, F, Tennyson, J, Triaud, A, Venot, O, Waldmann, I, Waltham, D, Wright, G, Amiaux, J, Auguères, J_L, Berthé, M, Bezawada, N, Bishop, G, Bowles, N, Coffey, D, Colomé, J, Crook, M, Crouzet, P-E, Da Peppo, V, Escudero Sanz, I, Focardi, M, Frericks, M, Hunt, T, Kohley, R, Middleton, K, Morgante, G, Ottensamer, R, Pace, E, Pearson, C, Stamper, R, Symonds, K, Rengel, M, Renotte, E, Ade, P, Affer, L, Alard, C, Allard, N, Altieri, F, André, Y, Arena, C, Argyriou, I, Aylward, A, Baccani, C, Bakos, G, Banaszkiewicz, M, Barlow, M, Batista, V, Bellucci, G, Benatti, S, Bernardi, P, Bézard, B, Blecka, M, Bolmont, E, Bonfond, B, Bonito, R, Bonomo, AS, Brucato, JR, Brun, AS, Bryson, I, Bujwan, W, Casewell, S, Charnay, B, Cecchi Pestellini, C, Chen, G, Ciaravella, A, Claudi, R, Clédassou, R, Damasso, M, Damiano, M, Danielski, C, Deroo, P, Di Giorgio, AM, Dominik, C, Doublier, V, Doyle, S, Doyon, R, Drummond, B, Duong, B, Eales, S, Edwards, B, Farina, M, Flaccomio, M, Fletcher, L, Forget, F, Fossey, F, Fränz, M, Fujii, Y, García-Piquer, A, Gear, W, Geoffray, H, Gérard, JC, Gesa, L, Gomez, H, Graczyk, R, Griffith, C, Grodent, D, Guarcello, MG, Gustin, J, Hamano, K, Hargrave, P, Hello, Y, Heng, K, Herrero, E, Hornstrup, A, Hubert, B, Ida, S, Ikoma, M, Iro, N, Irwin, P, Jarchow, C, Jaubert, J, Jones, H, Julien, Q, Kameda, S, Kerschbaum, F, Kervella, P, Koskinen, T, Krijger, M, Krupp, N, Lafarga, M, Landini, F, Lellouch, E, Leto, G, Luntzer, A, Rank-Lüftinger, T, Maggio, A, Maldonado, J, Maillard, JP, Mall, U, Marquette, JB, Mathis, S, Maxted, P, Matsuo, T, Medvedev, A, Miguel, Y, Minier, V, Morello, G, Mura, A, Narita, N, Nascimbeni, V, Nguyen, TN, Noce, V, Oliva, F, Palle, E, Palmer, P, Pancrazzi, M, Papageorgiou, A, Parmentier, V, Perger, M, Petralia, A, Pezzuto, S, Pierrehumbert, R, Pillitteri, I, Piotto, G, Pisano, G, Prisinzano, L, Radioti, S, Réess, J-M, Rezac, L, Rocchetto, M, Rosich, S, Sanna, N, Santerne, S, Savini, G, Scandariato, G, Sicardy, B, Sierra, C, Sindoni, G, Sindoni, K, Snellen, I, Sobiecki, M, Soret, L, Sozzetti, A, Stiepen, A, Strugarek, A, Taylor, J, Taylor, W, Terenzi, L, Tessenyi, M, Tsiaras, A, Tucker, C, Valencia, D, Vasisht, G, Vazan, A, Vilardell, F, Vinatier, S, Viti, S, Waters, R, Wawer, P, Wawrzaszek, A, Whitworth, A, Yung, YL, Yurchenko, SN, Zapatero Osorio, MR, Zellem, R, Zingales, T and Zwart, F (2018) A chemical survey of exoplanets with ARIEL. Experimental Astronomy 46, 135209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tjoa, JN, Mueller, M and Van Der Tak, FF (2020) The subsurface habitability of small, icy exomoons. Astronomy and Astrophysics 636, A50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tosi, N, Godolt, M, Stracke, B, Ruedas, T, Grenfell, JL, Höning, D, Nikolaou, A, Plesa, AC, Breuer, D and Spohn, T (2017) The habitability of a stagnant-lid Earth. Astronomy and Astrophysics 605, A71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toupance, G, Raulin, F and Buvet, R (1975) Formation of prebiochemical compounds in models of the primitive Earth's atmosphere. Origins of Life 6, 8390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turbet, M, Bolmont, E, Chaverot, G, Ehrenreich, D, Leconte, J and Marcq, E (2021) Day–night cloud asymmetry prevents early oceans on Venus but not on Earth. Nature 598, 276280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turbet, M and Selsis, F (2021) Main ways in which stars influence the climate and surface habitability of their planets. arXiv e-prints p. arXiv:2104.06391.Google Scholar
Ueno, Y, Yamada, K, Yoshida, N, Maruyama, S and Isozaki, Y (2006) Evidence from fluid inclusions for microbial methanogenesis in the early Archaean era. Nature 440, 516519.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vance, S, Harnmeijer, J, Kimura, J, Hussmann, H, DeMartin, B and Brown, JM (2007) Hydrothermal systems in small ocean planets. Astrobiology 7, 9871005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Visscher, C, Lodders, K and Fegley, B (2006) Atmospheric chemistry in giant planets, brown dwarfs, and low-mass dwarf stars. II. Sulfur and phosphorus. The Astrophysical Journal 648, 11811195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walton, CR, Shorttle, O, Hu, S, Rae, AS, Jianglong, J, Černok, A, Williams, H, Liu, Y, Tang, G, Li, Q and Anand, M (2021) Ancient and recent collisions revealed by phosphate minerals in the Chelyabinsk meteorite. arXiv e-prints p. arXiv:2112.06038.Google Scholar
Wernicke, LJ and Jakosky, BM (2021) Martian hydrated minerals: a significant water sink. Journal of Geophysical Research (Planets) 126, e06351.Google Scholar
Williams, DM and Gaidos, E (2008) Detecting the glint of starlight on the oceans of distant planets. Icarus 195, 927937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woese, CR (1979) A proposal concerning the origin of life on the planet earth. Journal of Molecular Evolution 13, 95101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wogan, N, Krissansen-Totton, J and Catling, DC (2020) Abundant atmospheric methane from volcanism on terrestrial planets is unlikely and strengthens the case for methane as a biosignature. The Planetary Science Journal 1, 58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woitke, P, Helling, C, Hunter, G, Millard, J, Turner, G, Worters, M, Blecic, J and Stock, J (2018) Equilibrium chemistry down to 100 K. Impact of silicates and phyllosilicates on the carbon to oxygen ratio. Astronomy and Astrophysics 614, A1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woitke, P, Herbort, O, Helling, Ch., Stüeken, E, Dominik, M, Barth, P and Samra, D (2021) Coexistence of CH4, CO2, and H2O in exoplanet atmospheres. Astronomy and Astrophysics 646, A43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wunderlich, F, Scheucher, M, Grenfell, JL, Schreier, F, Sousa-Silva, C, Godolt, M and Rauer, H (2021) Detectability of biosignatures on LHS 1140 b. Astronomy and Astrophysics 647, A48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Definition of the nutrient availability levels

Figure 1

Figure 1. Results of the 1D atmospheric model for CC total element abundances and surface conditions of Tsurf = 700 K and psurf = 70 bar. Left panel: Gas-phase composition of the model atmosphere with the indicated nutrient availability levels at the top. Right panel: Thermally stable cloud condensates in the model atmosphere.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Nutrient availability levels applied to a range of atmospheric models for different sets of total element abundances. The colouring of all present nutrient availability levels are given in the legend above. The solid black line provides the pressure level of the $\rm {H_{2}O}$[l,s] cloud base in the respective models. The darker shade of the nutrient availability levels (indicated with * in the legend) shows the corresponding nutrient availability level of gas-phase composition although the primary assumption of the presence of $\rm {H_{2}O}$[l,s] is not fulfilled. The green cross hatched region indicates $\rm {N_2}/n_{\rm tot} < 10^{-9}$. The horizontal dotted lines refer to the gas phase temperature Tgas.

Figure 3

Table 2. Gas-phase molecules according to their highest concentration in the models

Supplementary material: File

Herbort et al. supplementary material

Herbort et al. supplementary material
Download Herbort et al. supplementary material(File)
File 3.9 MB