Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:15:50.532Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE CONSCIOUSNESS OF THE PAST IN THE CREATIVITY OF THE PRESENT: MODERN TIBETAN LITERATURE AND SOCIAL CHANGE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 January 2011

Lama Jabb
Lama Jabb
Affiliation:
University of Oxford. E-mail [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Thus sings Sangdhor in a metrical poem in praise of Tibetan versification, countering an anti-verse sentiment that is prevalent on the contemporary Tibetan literary scene. Since the flourishing of free verse form in the 1980s, thanks to the pioneering works of Dhondup Gyal, many Tibetan writers have attacked metrical composition for its perceived inflexible, archaic and inadaptable form and uniformity of content. Sangdhor, one of the most iconoclastic and forward-thinking intellectuals writing in Tibetan today, vehemently refutes such a stance on the grounds that the bulk of great Tibetan works, literary or otherwise, are set in verse. To underscore his point he writes the cited poem in a “leaping and flying” style of the mgur (‘poem-songs’) genre. In fact, most of his many innovative poems are written in an eclectic style drawing on Tibet's rich literary tradition, Buddhist texts, oral sources and contemporary writings. Their content is equally diverse yet most of all current. It is infused with social and religious criticism, themes of romance and eroticism, critical literary commentary and current Tibetan affairs. His poems, like those of many other writers, show that metered poetry is very much a part of modern Tibetan literature. As he draws on classical literature and indigenous oral traditions for his own literary innovation, to borrow a concept from Northrop Frye, in Sangdhor's work we can “see an enormous number of converging patterns of significance” that is a complication of Tibetan literary formulas stretching to the narratives of the distant past.2 Therefore, it must be borne in mind that modern Tibetan literature transcends a theory of rupture which many scholars overstress to the point of overlooking its deep, outspread roots. Some parts of these roots predate both the 1980s, which saw a flourishing of new Tibetan writing, and the Chinese takeover of Tibet in the 1950s that has had a profound impact on Tibetan cultural production.

Keywords

Tibetan literatureTibetan poetryDhondup GyalSangdhor
Type
Review Articles
Information
International Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , January 2011 , pp. 89 - 95
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barnett 2005 Barnett, Robert. “Beyond the Collaborator – Martyr Model: Strategies of Compliance, Opportunism, and Opposition Within Tibet.” In Contemporary Tibet: Politics, Development, and Society in a Disputed Region, eds. Sautman, Barry and Dreyer, June T., pp. 25–66. New York, London: M. E. Sharpe, 2005.Google Scholar
Dhondup Gyal 1997 Gyal, Dhondup. don grub rgyal. dpal don grub rgyal gyi gsung ‘bum. pod dang po nas drug pa (‘The Collected Works of Dhondup Gyal. Six Volumes’). Beijing: Minority Nationality Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Eliot 2001 Eliot, T. S. “Tradition and the Individual Talent.” In The Norton Anthology of Theory and Criticism, eds. Leitch, Vincent B. et al. , pp. 1092–98. New York: W. W. Norton and Company, 2001 [1919].Google Scholar
Frye 1957 Frye, Northrop. Anatomy of Criticism: Four Essays. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartley 2008 Hartley, Lauran. “Heterodox Views and the New Orthodox Poems: Tibetan Writers in the Early and Mid-Twentieth Century.” In Modern Tibetan Literature and Social Change, eds. Hartley, Lauran R. and Schiaffini-Vedani, Patricia, pp. 3–31. Durham N.C., London: Duke University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Hartley and Bum 2001 Hartley, Lauran and Bum, Pema. “A Show to Delight the Masses.” In Persimmon: Asian Literature, Arts and Culture 1:3 (2001), pp. 58–77.Google Scholar
Lin 2008 Lin, Nancy G. “Dondrup Gyel and the Remaking of the Tibetan Ramayana.” In Modern Tibetan Literature and Social Change, eds. Hartley, Lauran R. and Schiaffini-Vedani, Patricia, pp. 86–111. Durham N.C., London: Duke University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sangdhor 2010 Sangdhor, . seng rdor. 2010. www.Sangdor.comGoogle Scholar
Sanggye Kyab 1993 Kyab, Sanggye. sangs rgyas skyabs. sngon ‘gro'i gtam. bod kyi deng rabs rtsom rig dpe tshogs. rtsom dpyad gtam tshogs. ‘gyur med kyis bsgrigs. (“Preface, An Anthology of Literary Criticism compiled by Gyurmei for Book Series on Modern Tibetan Literature”). Xining: Qinghai Minority Nationality Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Sperling 2009 Sperling, Elliot. Address at the International Conference on Exploring Tibet's History and Culture in Delhi, November 2009 at: http://www.jamyangnorbu.com/blog/2009/12/17/unleashing-the-r-word/CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsering Dhondup 1996 Dhondup, Tsering. tshe ring don grub. tshe ring don grub kyi sgrung thung bdams bsgrigs. (“A Collection of Tsering Dhondup's Short Stories”). Xining: Qinghai Minority Nationality Press, 1996.Google Scholar