Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:07:46.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

X-rays and γ-rays from Supernova 1987a

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

P. Sutherland
Affiliation:
Physics Dept., McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada and Visiting Member, JILA 1986-87
Y. Xu
Affiliation:
JILA, University of Colorado and National Bureau of Standards, Boulder, Colorado, USA
R. McCray
Affiliation:
JILA, University of Colorado and National Bureau of Standards, Boulder, Colorado, USA
R. Ross
Affiliation:
Dept. of Physics, College of the Holy Cross, Worcester, Mass., USA

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The observation of X-rays and γ-rays from SN 1987a can provide important constraints on parameters for models of this unique event. We present the results of detailed Monte Carlo calculations of the fluxes to be expected in several X-ray bands and for the strong line at 847 keV associated with the decay of 56Co. Our calculations use Model 10H of Woosley, Pinto, and Ensman(1988), with 0.075M of radioactive material. If it is assumed that there is no mixing of this material with the layers above, then the X-ray fluxes do not become detectable as early as the observations made by the Ginga team in August, 1987. If these observations correspond to X-rays arising from γ-rays Compton scattered down in energy in the supernova ejecta, rather than the interaction of the ejecta with circumstellar matter, then they can only be explained by mixing outward of radioactive material or an envelope with some combination of less mass or greater kinetic energy per unit mass.

Type
Part III. Chemical and Dynamical Structures of Exploding Stars
Copyright
Copyright © Springer-Verlag 1988

References

Ambwani, K., and Sutherland, P.G. 1988, Ap. J., 325, 000.Google Scholar
Arnett, D. 1987, Ap. J., in press.Google Scholar
Chan, K.W., and Lingenfelter, R.E. 1987, Ap. J. Letters, 318, L51.Google Scholar
Dotani, T. et al. 1987, Nature, submitted.Google Scholar
Ebisuzaki, T., and Shibazaki, N. 1987, Ap. J. (Letters), submitted.Google Scholar
Gehreis, N., MacCallum, C.J., and Leventhal, M. 1987, Ap. J. Letters, 320, L19.Google Scholar
Hillebrandt, W., Höflich, P., Truran, J.W., and Weiss, A. 1987, Nature, 327, 597.Google Scholar
Itoh, M., Kumagai, S., Shigeyama, T., Nomoto, K., and Nishimura, J. 1987, Nature, submitted.Google Scholar
McCray, R., Shull, J.M., and Sutherland, P. 1987, Ap. J. Letters, 317, L73.Google Scholar
Nomoto, K., Shigeyama, T., and Hashimoto, M. 1987, to be published in the Proceedings of the ESO Workshop on SN 1987a, ed. Danziger, J..Google Scholar
Nomoto, K., Shigeyama, T., Hayakawa, S., Itoh, H., and Masai, K. 1987, to be published in the Proceedings of the Fourth George Mason Workshop on SN 1987a.Google Scholar
Pinto, P.A., and Woosley, S.E. 1988, Ap. J., submitted.Google Scholar
Pozdnyakov, L.A., Sobol, I.M., and Sunyaev, R.A. 1983, Soviet Sci. Rev., Ap. and Space Phys., ed. Sunyaev, R.A., 2, 189 (New York: Harwood).Google Scholar
Tanaka, Y. 1987, talk given at IAU Colloquium 108, Tokyo.Google Scholar
Woosley, S.E., Pinto, P., and Ensman, L. 1988, Ap. J., 324, 000.Google Scholar
Woosley, S.E. 1988, Ap. J., submitted.Google Scholar
Xu, Y., Sutherland, P.G., McCray, R.A., and Ross, R.R. 1988, Ap. J., in press.Google Scholar