No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 September 2019
“By assuming that the atmosphere is
homogeneous at each depth, we are
immeasurably adding to the numerical
tractability of the problem at the
expense of ignoring 80 years' worth
of data on chromospheric inhomogeneities”
Linsky and Avrett (1970)To the spatial inhomogeneity, Linsky and Avrett could have added the variations with time which are also well known, well observed characteristics of the solar chromosphere. Let me quote also Praderie (1969): large asymmetries are observed in stellar K2 components which vary with time, “so that it seems difficult to think of any interpretation of the K line profile that would ignore motions and inhomogeneities in the atmosphere of those stars” And let me borrow a conclusion from Thomas (1969): “So what we need are ingenious ideas for empirical inference; or theoretical generalization from experience with the solar case” I wonder if the solar experience is sufficient at the present time to permit any theoretical generalization, as has been the case for the solar wind. In order to simplify, I shall restrict the scope of this contribution to the quiet solar chromosphere, and focus only on spicules.