Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:09:45.021Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Systematic Errors in Double Star Observations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

Geoffrey G. Douglass
Affiliation:
U.S. Naval Observatory, Washington, DC 20392, USA
Charles E. Worley
Affiliation:
U.S. Naval Observatory, Washington, DC 20392, USA

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We have examined the visual and speckle observations of visual double stars made by 31 experienced observers in order to evaluate possible systematic errors in these series. Using 57 “definitive” orbits, we find no appreciable errors in position angle. We do find systematic effects in separation for some observers, and, in particular, a “proximity” effect for measurements of pairs closer than 0″.5.

Root-mean-square residuals are:

Type
Classical Methods, Catalogs, & Databases
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of the Pacific 1992

References

Douglass, G.G. 1991, unpublishedGoogle Scholar
Harrington, R.S. 1991, unpublishedGoogle Scholar
Harrington, R.S. 1992, IAU Colloquium No. 135 Google Scholar
Pannunzio, R., Zappala, V., Massone, G., & Morbidelli, R. 1986, A&A, 166, 337 Google Scholar
Pannunzio, R., Massone, G., & Morbidelli, R. 1988, A&A, 203, 388 Google Scholar
Worley, C.E. & Heintz, W.D. 1983, Fourth Catalog of Orbits of Visual Binary Stars, Publ. U.S. Naval Obs., XXIV, Pt. 7 Google Scholar
Worley, C.E. & Douglass, G.G. 1970, BAAS, 2, No. 2, 226 Google Scholar