Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T15:39:35.842Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Symplectic Mapping Model as a Tool to Understand The Dynamics of 2/1 Resonant Asteroid Motion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

John D. Hadjidemetriou
John D. Hadjidemetriou*
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, GreeceE-mail:[email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We present a 3-D symplectic mapping model that is valid at the 2:1 mean motion resonance in the asteroid motion, in the Sun-Jupiter-asteroid model. This model is used to study the dynamics inside this resonance and several features of the system have been made clear. The introduction of the third dimension, through the inclination of the asteroid orbit, plays an important role in the evolution of the asteroid and the appearance of chaotic motion. Also, the existence of the secondary resonances is clearly shown and their role in the appearance of chaotic motion and the slow diffusion of the elements of the orbit is demonstrated.

Keywords

: resonancechaotic motiondiffusionsecondary resonances.
Type
Extended Abstracts
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 172: Impact of Modern Dynamics in Astronomy , 1999 , pp. 65 - 76
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1999

References

Ferraz-Mello, S.: 1997, A Symplectic Mapping approach to the study of the Stochasticity ofasteroidal Resonances, Cel. Mec. Dyn. Astr. 65, 421–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferraz-Mello, S. and Michtchenko, T.A.: 1997, Orbital evolution of Asteroids in the Hecuba Gap, in Dvorak, R. and henrard, J. (eds.) The Dynamical behaviour of our Planetary System, Kluwer Acad. Publ., 377–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferraz-Mello, S., Michtchenko, T.A., Nesvorný, D., Roig, F. and Simula, A.: 1998a, The depletion of the Hecuba Gap vs. the long-lasting Hilda group, Planetary and Space Science, in press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferraz-Mello, S., Michtchenko, , and Roig, F.: 1998b, The determinant mie of Jupiter’s Great Inequality in the depletion of the Hecuba Gap, Astron. J. 116, 1491–1500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, F.: 1994, En examination of the relation between Chaotic Orbits and the Kirkwood Gap at the 2:1 Resonance, Icarus 107, 1890–1899.Google Scholar
Gallardo, T. and Ferraz-Mello, S.: 1998, Understanding libration via time-frequency analysis Astron.J. 113, 863–870.Google Scholar
Hadjidemetriou, J.D.: 1993, Asteroid Motion near the 3:1 Resonance, Cel. Mec. Dyn. Astr. 56, 563–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadjidemetriou, J.D. and Lemaitre, A.: 1997, Asteroid motion near the 2:1 resonance: a symplectic mapping approach, in Dvorak, R. and Henrard, J. (eds.) The Dynamical Behaviour of our Planetary System, kluwer Acad. Publ., 277–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henrard, J. and Lemaitre, A.: 1987, A Perturbative Treatment of the 2/1 Jovian Resonance, Icarus 69, 266–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henrard, J., Watanabe, N. and Moons, M.: 1995, A bridge between Secondary and Secular Resonances inside the Hecuba Gap, Icarus 115, 336–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemaitre, A. and Henrard, J.: 1990, On the Origin of Chaotic Behaviour in the 2/1 Kirkwood Gap, Icarus 83, 391–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michtchenko, T.A. and Ferraz-Mello, S.: 1997, Escape of Asteroids from the Hecuba Gap, Planetary and Space Science 45, 1587–1593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moons, M. and Morbidelli, A.: 1993, The main Mean Motion Commensurabilities in the Planar Circular and Elliptic Problem, Cel. Mec. Dyn. Astr. 57, 99–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moons, M. and Morbidelli, A.: 1995, Secular Resonances in Mean Motion Commensurabilities: the 4/3, 3/1, 5/2 and 7/3 cases, Icarus 114, 33–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moons, M., Morbidelli, A. and Migliorini, F.: 1998, Dynamical Structure of the 2/1 Commensurability with Jupiter and the origin of the Resonant Asteroids, Icarus ***CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morbidelli, A.: 1996, On the Kirkwood Gap at the 2/1 Commensurability with Jupiter: numerical results, Astron. J. 111, 2453–2461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morbidelli, A. and Moons, M.: 1993, Secular Resonances in Mean Motion Commensurabilities: the 2/1 and 3/2 cases, Icarus 102, 316–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nesvorny, D. and Ferraz-Mello, S.: 1997, On the asteroidal population of the first-order resonances, Icarus 130, 247–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Šidlichovský, M.: 1988, On the Origin of 5/2 Kirkwood Gap in Proceedings of the IAU Colloq. 96, The Few Body Problem, Turku, (ed. Valtonen, M.), p. 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Šidlichovský, M.: 1991, Tables of the Disturbing Function for Resonant Asteroids, Bull. Astron. Inst.Czech. 42, 116–123.Google Scholar
Šidlichovský, M.: 1992, Mapping For the Asteroidal Resonances, Astron. Astrophys. 259, 341–348.Google Scholar
Wisdom, J.: 1982, The origin of the Kirkwood Gaps, Astron. J. 87, 577–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wisdom, J.: 1983, Chaotic Behaviour and the Origin of the 3/1 Kirkwood Gap, Icarus 56, 51–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wisdom, J.: 1985, A Perturbative Treatment of Motion Near the 3/1 Commensurability, Icarus 63, 272–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoshikawa, M.: 1989, A survey of’the Motion ofAsteroids in Commensurabilitieswith Jupiter, Astron. Astrophys. 213, 436–458.Google Scholar
Yoshikawa, M.: 1991, Motions of Asteroids at the Kirkwood Gaps. II. On the 5:2, 7:3 and 2:1 Resonances with Jupiter, Icarus 92, 94–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar