Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-13T03:43:29.012Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Solar Oblateness and Differentially Rotating Polytropes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

G. G. Fahlman ,
M. D. T. Naylor  and
S. P. S. Anand

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Dicke and Goldenberg (1967a) measured the solar oblateness to be σ= (5±0.7) × 10-5 and subsequently interpreted this measurement as evidence that the solar interior rotates with a period of 1.d8. With this interpretation, they then showed that the observed oblateness causes an 8% discrepancy in the Einstein prediction of the perihelion advance of Mercury. The stability analysis of Goldreich and Schubert (1967) seems to preclude such a fast rotation of the solar interior although magnetic field effects could alter their conclusions (Dicke, 1967). More recently Goldreich and Schubert (1968) and Fricke (1969) have calculated upper bounds to the solar oblateness essentially by finding the steepest distribution of angular velocity that is consistent with secular stability at each point in the equatorial plane of the sun. Fricke’s result of σmax=1.4 × 10-5 is based on a stronger stability criterion than that of Goldreich and Schubert who found σmax=1.4 × 10-4; Fricke, however, suggests that this may be in error and should actually be σmax=3.4 × 10-5. In their calculations of σmax the above authors assumed that the outer convective layers of the sun are rotating uniformly and that the angular velocity in the interior is a function of the radial distance from the center of the sun only. We note that while these assumptions are reasonable, neither of them is supported by the observed solar rotation.

Type
Part IV / The Rotation of the Sun
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 4: Stellar Rotation , 1970 , pp. 352 - 355
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1970

References

Allen, C. W.: 1963, Astrophysical Quantities, Athlone Press, London.Google Scholar
Anand, S. P. S.: 1968, Astrophys. J. 153, 135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anand, S. P. S. and Fahlman, G. G.: 1968, Icarus 8, 492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandrasekhar, S.: 1933, Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 93, 390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cocke, W. J.: 1967, Astrophys. J. 150, 1041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dicke, R. H.: 1967, Science 157, 960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dicke, R. H. and Goldenberg, H. Mark: 1967a, Phys. Rev. Letters 18, 313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dicke, R. H. and Goldenberg, H. Mark: 1967b, Nature 214, 1294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fricke, K.: 1969, Astrophys. Letters 3, 219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldreich, P. and Schubert, G.: 1967, Astrophys. J. 150, 571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldreich, P. and Schubert, G.: 1968, Astrophys. J. 154, 1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, R. A.: 1964, Astrophys. J. 140, 552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naylor, M. D. T.: 1968, unpublished.Google Scholar
Stoeckly, R.: 1965, Astrophys. J. 142, 208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar