Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T22:49:48.751Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The ROTOR: Rotation of Frames Via Representation of Systematic Differences in Terms of Spherical Functions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

V. V. Vityazev
V. V. Vityazev*
Affiliation:
Astronomical Institute, St. Petersburg University St. Petersburg, Russia

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The paper presents a method to derive rotational angles between two reference frames from the systematic differences represented in terms of spherical functions – hereafter referred to as the ROTOR (ROTation by Orthogonal Representation). It is shown that the ROTOR is preferable over the least-squares technique since it (a) takes into account only the harmonics which correspond to rotation, (b) tests them for pure rotation, and (c) discovers the existence of quasirotational terms which may smear rotation. Due to these properties the ROTOR yields realistic results even in the case when the observational data contain not only noise but other systematic terms that have nothing to do with rotation. Numerical experiments with the FK5 and three catalogs of radio sources are described.

Type
Reference Systems and Astronomical Standards
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 165: Dynamics and Astrometry of Natural and Artificial Celestial Bodies , 1997 , pp. 463 - 474
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1997

References

Bien, R., Fricke, W., Lederle, T., and Schwan, H.: 1978, “Methods for comparison of systems of star positions to be applied in the construction of the FK5”, Veröff. Astron. Rechen-Inst. Heiden., No 29.Google Scholar
Brosche, P.: 1966, “Representation of systematic differences in positions and proper motions of stars by spherical harmonics”, Veröff. Astron. Rechen-Inst. Heidelb., No 17.Google Scholar
Fricke, W., Schwan, H., and Lederle, T.: 1988, “Fifth Fundamental Catalogue (FK5)”, Veröff. Astron. Rechen-Inst. Heidelb., No 32.Google Scholar
IERS 1989, Annual Report for 1988, Obs. de Paris.Google Scholar
Lindegren, L. and Kovalevsky, J.: 1995, “Linking the Hipparcos Catalogue to the extra-galactic reference system, Astron. Astrophys. 304, 189–201.Google Scholar
Melbourne, W.R., et al.: 1983, “Project MERIT Standards”, USNO Circ, No 167.Google Scholar
Svidunovich, A.G. 1990, “Radio stars”, Diploma thesis, St. Petersburg University.Google Scholar
Schwan, H.: 1977, “Development and testing of a method to derive an instrumental system of positions and proper motions of stars”, Veröff. Astron. Rechen-Inst. Heidelb., No 27.Google Scholar
Vityazev, V.V.: 1994, “The ROTOR: A new method to derive rotation between two reference frames”, Astron. Astrophys. Trans. 4, 195–218. (Paper 1).Google Scholar
Vityazev, V.V.: 1996, “The ROTOR: Testing of the method to derive rotation between two reference frames”, Astron. Astrophys. Trans., in press, (Paper 2).Google Scholar