Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-12T17:37:54.548Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Revision of Yugas and Yuga-Constants in Indian Astronomy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

K.V. Sarma
K.V. Sarma*
Affiliation:
Adayar Library and Research Centre, Madras-20, India

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Among the historians of Indian astronomy, John Bentley seems to be first to stress, nearly two hundred years ago, that yuga and kalpa, which form the basic time-divisions used for traditional astronomical computations in India, are not historical but astronomically interpolated. Bentley says that a division of time simply into the four yugas, viz. Krta, Tretā, Dwāpara and Kali, was introduced in 204 B.C. “It appears,” as Bentley surmises, “that at, or about this period (204 B.C.), improvements were made in astronomy; new and more accurate tables of the planetary motions and positions were found, and equations introduced. Beside these improvements, the Hindu history was divided into periods, for chronological purposes....The period immediately preceding the inventor was called the first, or Kali yuga; the secojid or next, was called the Dwāpara Yuga; the third was called the Tretā Yuga; and the fourth, or furthest back from the author, was called Kṛta Yuga and with which the creation began. The end of the first period, called Kali was fixed by a conjunction of the Sun, Moon and Jupiter, in the beginning of Cancer, on the 26th June 299 B.C. This was called the Satya Yuga, or true conjunction, and is the radical point from which the calculation proceeds” (Bentley 1823, p.61-62).

Type
Ancient Elements and Planetary Models
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 91: History of Oriental Astronomy , 1987 , pp. 77 - 84
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

References

Bentley, John (1797). Remarks on the principal eras and dates of the ancient Hindus. Asiatic Researches, 5, 315–343.Google Scholar
Bentley, John(1799) On antiquity of the Sūryasiddhānta and the formation of the astronomical therein obtained, Asiatic Researches, 8, 193–244.Google Scholar
Bentley, John (1823). A Historical Review of the Hindu Astronomy, Calcutta reprinted London 1825.Google Scholar
Billard, Roger, (1977). Āryabhata and the Indian Astronomy: An outline of an unexpected insight, Indian Journal of History of Science, 12, 222.Google Scholar
Karaṇapaddhati, Ed. Sambasiva Sastri, K., Trivandrum Sanskrit Series, 126, Trivandrum, 1937.Google Scholar
Khaṇḍakhādyaka of Brahamagupta (A.D.628). Ed. with Vāsanābhāṣya of Āmarāja by Babuji Misra, , Calcutta Univ. 1925.Google Scholar
Khaṇḍakhādyaka of Brahamagupta (A.D.628). Translated into English, Univ. of Calcuta, 1934.Google Scholar
Khaṇḍakhādyaka of Brahamagupta (A.D.628). Ed. with Commentary of Prthūdakasvāmin (A.D. 864) by P.C. Sengupta, , Calcutta Univ. 1941.Google Scholar
Khaṇḍakhādyaka of Brahamagupta (A.D.628). Critically edited with commentary of Bhaṭṭotpala and English translation by Bina Chatterjee, 2 Vols, World Press, Calcuta, 1970.Google Scholar
Pañcasiddhāntika of, Varahamihira(d. A.D.587). Edited with an original commentary in Sanskrit by Sudhākara Dvivedi and English translation by G. Thibaut, , Benares, 1889, republished Motailal Banarsidass, Banares 1930, reprinted 1968.Google Scholar
Sarma, K.V.(1977). Tantrasaṃgraha of Nīlakaṇṭha (A.D. 1444-1545), with Yuktidīpikā and Laghuvivṛti of Saḵkara,edited with introduction and appendices, Hoshiarpur.Google Scholar
Sastry, T.S.K.(1974). The main characteristics of Hindu astronomy, Indian Journal of History of Science, 9, 31–44.Google Scholar
Shukla, K.S.(1957). Sūryasiddhānta with Vivaraṇa of Parameśvara (A.D. 1360-1455), edited with introduction, Lucknow University.Google Scholar