Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T15:52:52.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Report on the Homestake Chlorine Solar Neutrino Experiment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

R. Davis
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania, Phila., PA 19104
K. Lande
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania, Phila., PA 19104
C.K. Lee
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania, Phila., PA 19104
B.T. Cleveland
Affiliation:
Los Alamos National Lab., Los Alamos, NM 87545
J. Ullman
Affiliation:
Herbert Lehman Col., Bronx, NY 10468

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A report on the results obtained from the chlorine radiochemical solar neutrino experiment in the Homestake mine, Lead, SD. Over the period 1970-1988 a neutrino capture rate of 2.3 ± 0.3 SNU was observed. This rate is discussed in relation: to the theoretical standard solar model, the results from the Kamiokande II experiment, and variations in the solar neutrino flux.

Type
Part 2: Neutrinos
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1990

References

1. Davis, R., Harmer, D.S., and Hoffman, K.C. (1968), Phys. Rev. Lett. 14, 20.Google Scholar
2. Davis, R. (1978), ‘The Status and Future of Solar Neutrino Research1, 1, in Friedlander, G. (ed.), Brookhaven National Laboratory Report BNL 50879; Rowley, J.K., Cleveland, B.T. and Davis, R. (1985), in Cherry, M.L., Fowler, W.A., and Lande, K. (eds.), American Inst. Phys. Conf. Proc. No. 126, p.l; Bahcall, J.N. and Davis, R. (1976), Science 191, 264.Google Scholar
3. Cleveland, B.T. (1983), Nucl. Inst. and Methods 214, 451.Google Scholar
4. Wolfendale, A.W., Young, E.C.M. and Davis, R. (1972), Nature, Phys. Sciences 238, 1301; Cassiday, G.L. (1973), Proc. 13th Inst. Cosmic Ray Conf. 13, 1958; see calc. Zatselim, G.T. et al (1981), Soviet J. Nucl. Phys. 33, 200.Google Scholar
5. Fireman, E., Cleveland, B.T., Davis, R. and Rowley, J.K. (1985), in Cherry, M.L., Fowler, W.A. and Lande, K. (eds.) American Inst. Phys. Conf. Proc. No 126, p.22.Google Scholar
6. Bahcall, J.N. and Ulrich, R.K. (1988), Rev. Modem Phys. 60, 297; report Inside the Sun Conference.Google Scholar
7. Turck-Chieze, S., Cahen, S., Casse, M. and Doom, C. (1988), Astrophys. J. 335, 415; report Inside the Sun Conference.Google Scholar
8. Hirata, K.S. et al (Kamiokande group) (1988), Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 16 (see also Phys. Rev. D38, 448); report Inside the Sun Conference.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Mikheyev, S.P. and Smirnov, A.Yu. (1985), Soviet J. Nucl. Phys. 42, 913 (see the excellent review in Soviet Phys. Uspkhi 30, 759 (1987) summarizing calculations by many authors); Wolfenstein, L. (1978), Phys. Rev. D17, 2369.Google Scholar
10. Rowley, J.K. et al ref (2); Davis, R., 7th Workshop on Grand Unification/ICOBAN-86, Toyama, Japan, p.237, Arafune, J. (ed.); Davis, R., Cleveland, B.T. and Rowley, J.K., 20th Int. Cosmic Ray Conference, Aug. 2-15, 1987 Moscow, 4, 328; Neutrino 88 Conference, Boston, MA, 5-11 June 1988, Schneps, J. (ed.).Google Scholar
11. Voloshin, M.B., Vysotskii, M.I. and Okun, L.B. (1986), Soviet J. Nucl. Phys. 44, 440; (1986) Soviet Phys. 64, 446.Google Scholar
12. Fukugita, M. and Yanagida, T. (1987), Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 1807; Babu, K.S. and Mohapatra, R.N. (1989), Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 228.Google Scholar
13. Lim, C.-S. and Marciano, W. (1988), Phys. Rev. D37, 1368.Google Scholar
14. Akhmedov, E.Kh. (1988), Soviet Nuci. Phys. 48, 382; (1988) Phys. Lett B213, 64.Google Scholar
15. Minakata, H. and Nunokawa, H. (1989), Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 121 and Akhmedov, E.Kh., (1989), Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 95, 1195; and 95, 442.Google Scholar
16. Delache, P., Laclare, F. and Sadsaoud, H. (1985), Nature 317, 426; report Inside the Sun Conference.Google Scholar
17. Veselov, A.I., Vysotskii, M.I. and Yurov, V.P. (1987), Soviet J. Nucl. Phys. 45, 865.Google Scholar