Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T15:46:54.375Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Radiation Hydrodynamics in Solar Flares

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

George H. Fisher
George H. Fisher*
Affiliation:
Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, Mail Code L-413 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Livermore, California 94550U.S.A.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Solar flares are currently understood as the explosive release of energy stored in the form of stressed magnetic fields. In many cases, the released energy seems to take the form of large numbers of electrons accelerated to high energies (the nonthermal electron “thick target” model), or alternatively plasma heated to very high temperatures behind a rapidly moving conduction front (the “thermal” model). The transport of this energy into the remaining portion of the atmosphere results in violent mass motion and strong emission across the electromagnetic spectrum. Radiation processes play a crucial role in determining the ensuing plasma motion.

One important phenomenon observed during flares is the appearance in coronal magnetic loops of large amounts of upflowing, soft X-ray emitting plasma at temperatures of 1−2×107 [K]. It is believed that this is due to chromospheric evaporation, the process of heating cool (T - 104[K]) chromospheric material beyond its ability to radiate. Detailed calculations of thick target heating show that if nonthermal electrons heat the chromosphere directly, then the evaporation process can result in explosive upward motion of X-ray emitting plasma if the heating rate exceeds a threshold value. In such a case, upflow velocities approach an upper limit of roughly 2.35 cs as the heating rate is increased beyond the threshold, where cs is the sound speed in the evaporated plasma. This is known as explosive evaporation. If the flare heating rate is less than the threshold, evaporation takes place indirectly through thermal conduction of heat deposited in the corona by the energetic electrons. Upflows in this case are roughly 10 to 20% of the upper limit. Evaporation by thermal model heating always takes place through thermal conduction, and the computed upflow speeds seem to be about 10% to 20% of the upper limit, independent of the energy flux.

The pressure increase in the evaporated plasma for either the thick target or thermal model leads to a number of interesting phenomena in the flare chromosphere. The sudden pressure increase initiates a downward moving “chromospheric condensation”, an overdense region which gradually decelerates as it accretes material and propagates into the gravitationally stratified chromosphere. Solutions to an equation of motion for this condensation shows that its motion decays after about one minute of propagation into the chromosphere. When the front of this downflowing region is supersonic relative to the atmosphere ahead of it, a radiating shock will form. If the downflow is rapid enough, the shock strength should be sufficient to excite UV radiation normally associated with the transition region, and furthermore, the radiating shock will be brighter than the transition region. These results lead to a number of observationally testable relationships between the optical and ultraviolet spectra from the condensation and radiating shock.

Type
2. Normal Stars
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 89: Radiation Hydrodynamics in Stars and Compacts Objects , 1986 , pp. 53 - 74
Copyright
Copyright © Springer-Verlag 1986

References

1. Krieger, A.S.: “X-ray Observations of Solar Structural Features”, in Proceedings of the OSO-8 Workshop, (Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Sciences, University of Colorado 1977)Google Scholar
2. Svestka, Z.: Solar Flares, (D. Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht, Holland (1976)Google Scholar
3. Pneumann, G.W: “Two Ribbon Flares: (post) Flare Loops”, in Solar Flare Magnetohydrodynamics, Priest, E.R. (ed), (Gordon and Breach Publ., New York 1981)Google Scholar
4. Kopp, R.A., Pneumann, G.W: Solar Physics 50, 85. (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Woodgate, B.E., Shine, R.A., Poland, A.I., Orwig, L.E.: Astrophysical Journal 265, 530. (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Canfield, R.C., Gunkler, T.A: Astrophysical Journal 288, 353. (1985)Google Scholar
7. Kane, S.R., Donnelly, R.F: Astrophysical Journal 161, 151. (1971)Google Scholar
8. Antonucci, E.,Gabriel, A.H., Dennis, B.R: Astrophysical Journal 287, 917. (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Brown, J.C: Solar Physics 26, 441. (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Lin, R.P., Hudson, H.S: Solar Physics 50, 153. (1976)Google Scholar
11. Kostyuk, N.D., Pikel’ner, S.B: Soviet Astronomy, 18, 590. (1975)Google Scholar
12. Kostyuk, N.D: Soviet Astronomy, 20, 206. (1976)Google Scholar
13. Craig, I.J.D., McClymont, A.N: Solar Physics 50, 133. (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Livshitz, M.A., Badalyan, O.G., Kosovichev, A.G., Katsova, M.M: Solar Physics 73, 269. (1981)Google Scholar
15. Somov, B.V., Syrovatskii, S.I., Spektor, A.R: Solar Physics 73, 145. (1981)Google Scholar
16. Cheng, C.C., Oran, E.S., Doschek, G.A., Boris, J.P., Mariska, J.T: Astrophysieal Journal 265, 1090. (1983)Google Scholar
17. Pallavicini, R., Peres, C., Serio, S., Vaiane, C., Acton, L., Leibacher, J., Rosner, R.: Astrophysieal Journal 270, 270. (1983)Google Scholar
18. Duijveman, A., Somov, B.V., Spektor, A.R: Solar Physics 88, 257. (1983)Google Scholar
19. MacNeice, P., McWhirter, R.W.P., Spicer, D.S., Burgess, A.: Solar Physics 90, 357. (1984)Google Scholar
20. Cheng, C.C., Karpen, J.T., Doschek, G.A.: Astrophysieal Journal 286, 787. (1984)Google Scholar
21. Machado, M.E., Averett, E.H., Vernazza, J.E., Noyes, R.W: Astrophysical Journal 242, 336. (1981)Google Scholar
22. Ricchiazzi, P.J., Canfield, R.C.: Astrophysical Journal 272, 739. (1983)Google Scholar
23. McClymont, A.N., Canfield, R.C.: Astrophysical Journal 265, 48з (1983)Google Scholar
24. Canfield, R.C., Fisher, G.H., McClymont, A.N: Astrophysical Journal 289, 507. (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. McClymont, A.N., Canfield, R.C.: Astrophysical Journal 265, 497. (1983)Google Scholar
26. An, C.H., Canfield, R.C., Fisher, G.H., McClymont, A.N: Astrophysical Journal 267, 421 . (1983)Google Scholar
27. Fisher, C.H., Canfield, R.C., McClymont, A.N: Astrophysical Journal 289, 414. (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28. Fisher, C.H., Canfield, R.C., McClymont, A.N: Astrophysical Journal 289, 425. (1985)Google Scholar
29. Fisher, G.H., Canfield, R.C., McClymont, A.N: Astrophysical Journal 289, 434. (1985)Google Scholar
30. Fisher, G.H.: In prep. (1985)Google Scholar
31. Canfield, R.C., McClymont, A.N., Puetter, R.C.: “Probabilistic Radiative Transfer”, in Methods in Radiative Transfer, ed. Kalkofen, Wolfgang (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1984)Google Scholar
32. Henoux, J.C., Nakagawa, Y.: Astronomy and Astrophysics, 57, 105. (1977)Google Scholar
33. Ricchiazzi, P.J.: PhD Thesis, University of California at San Diego (1982)Google Scholar
34. Raymond, J.C., Cox, D.P., Smith, B.W: Astrophysical Journal 204, 290. (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35. Raymond, J.C.: Private communication to P.J.Ricchiazzi (1980)Google Scholar
36. Spitzer, L.: Physics of Fully Ionized Gases (Interscience, New York 1962)Google Scholar
37. Hauer, A., Mead, W.C., Willi, O., Kilkenny, J.D., Bradley, D.K., Tabatabaei, S.D., Hooker, C.: Physical Review Letters, 53, 2563. (1984)Google Scholar
38. Luciani, J.F., Mora, P., Pallet, R.: Physics of Fluids, 28, 835. (1985)Google Scholar
39. Karpen, J.T., Devore, C.R.: Astrophysical Journal, submitted. (1985)Google Scholar
40. Fisher, G.H., Canfield, R.C., McClymont, A.N: Astrophysical Journal (Letters) 281, L79 (1984)Google Scholar
41. Vernazza, J.E., Averett, E.H., Loeser, R.: Astrophysical Journal (Supplement) 45, 619. (1981)Google Scholar
42. Ichimoto, K., Kurokawa, H.: Solar Physics 93, 105. (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
43. Fisher, G.H: In prep. (1985)Google Scholar
44. Canfield, R.C: Private communication. (1985)Google Scholar
45. Craig, I.J.D., McClymont, A.N: Astrophysical Journal (submitted) (1985)Google Scholar
46. Shull, J.M., McKee, C.F.: Astrophysical Journal 227, 131 (1979)Google Scholar