Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T02:31:53.379Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pulsar Death at an Advanced Age

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

Jonathan Arons*
Affiliation:
University of California

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Not long ago Rankin (1990) presented strong evidence in favor of a low altitude (rR*) dipole geometry for the site of the core component of pulsar radio emission. Arons (1993) gave evidence that spun up millisecond pulsars must have a substantially dipolar large scale field at low altitute. Electron-positron pair creation at low altitude above the polar caps has long been hypothesized to be an essential ingredient of pulsar radio emission. If so, all observed pulsars must lie in the region of P space where polar cap acceleration has sufficient vigor to lead to the copious pair production. Yet, to date, all internally consistent theories of polar cap pair creation have required hypothesizing a large scale (eg, quadrupole) component of the magnetic field with strength comparable to that of the dipole, in contradiction with the evidence in favor of an apparently dipolar low altitude geometry. The internally consistent theories also violate other observational constraints. The discharge models of Ruderman and Sutherland (1975), Gurevich and Istomin (1985), and Jones (1977, 1978, 1979) all accelerate equal, counterstreaming flows of electrons and positrons, thus putting one half of the particle acceleration energy into high energy particle and photon bombardment of the polar caps. The heating causes pulsed thermal X-ray emission from hot spots in excess of what is seen (Ogelman 1993). While the Arons and Scharlemann (1979) model does not have this problem, since the space charge in the starvation zone above the polar cap is made up almost entirely of the outbound beam, in star centered dipole geometry it dramatically fails to account for pulsar emission over most of the P diagram and predicts radio polarization variations in contradiction to the observations (Narayan and Vivekanand 1982).

Type
Part 3 Radio Emission Processes
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of the Pacific 1996

References

Arons, J., and Scharlemann, E.T. 1979, ApJ, 231, 854 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arons, J. 1993, ApJ, 408, 160 Google Scholar
Chen, K.-Y., and Ruderman, M.A. 1993, ApJ, 402, 264 Google Scholar
Gurevich, A.V., and Istomin, Ya.N. 1985, ZhEkspTeorFiz, 89, 3; Soviet Physics- JETP, 62, 1Google Scholar
Jones, P.B. 1977, Nature, 270, 38 Google Scholar
Jones, P.B. 1978, MNRAS, 184, 807 Google Scholar
Jones, P.B. 1979, MNRAS, 228, 536 Google Scholar
Luo, Q. 1996, MNRAS, in pressGoogle Scholar
Muslimov, A.G., and Tsygan, A.I. 1992, MNRAS, 255, 61 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narayan, R., and Vivekanand, M. 1982, A&A, 113, L3 Google Scholar
Ogelman, H. 1995, in The Lives of the Neutron Stars, Alpar, M.A., Kiziloglu, U., and van Paradijs, J. (Dordrecht: Kluwer),Google Scholar
Rankin, J.M. 1990, ApJ, 352, 247 Google Scholar
Ruderman, M.A., and Sutherland, P.G. 1975, ApJ, 196, 51 Google Scholar