Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T07:34:10.816Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Proton-Induced Fine-Structure Transitions*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

B. Zygelman  and
A. Dalgarno
B. Zygelman
Affiliation:
Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Cambridge, MA 02138
A. Dalgarno
Affiliation:
Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Cambridge, MA 02138

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Experimental studies of the intensity of the (2pl/2-lsl/2) and (2p3/2-lsl/2) lines of SXVI in the Alcator Takamak show large departures from the statistical ratio of 0.5 (Källne et al. 1982). Similar enhancements in the intensity ratio have been reported in solar observations (Grineva et al. 1973, Phillips et al. 1982) for the Mg XII lines and in laser produced plasmas (Boiko et al. 1977). Theoretical calculations of the intensity ratio have been carried out by Vinogradov et al. (1977), Beigman et al. (1979) and Ljepojevic et al. (1984) . We suspect that proton-impact induced transitions play a crucial role which depends sensitively on the conditions of temperature and density in the Plasma. In this abstract we will present some preliminary results of proton-impact excitation cross section calculations, for the n=2 sub levels of hydrogenic ions.

Type
Session 6. Poster Papers
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 86: Eighth International Colloquium on Ultraviolet and X-ray Spectroscopy of Astrophysical and Laboratory Plasmas , 1984 , pp. 200 - 202
Copyright
Copyright © Naval Research Laboratory 1984. Publication courtesy of the Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC.

Footnotes

*

This work was supported in part by the United States Department of Energy, Division of Chemical Sciences.

References

Alder, K., Bohr, A., Huus, T., Mottelson, B., and Winther, A. 1956, Rev. of Modern Physics, 28, 432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beigman, I.L., Burreva, L.A. and Skobelev, I.Yu. 1979, Astron. Zh. 56, 1281 (Sov. Astron. 22, 725).Google Scholar
Boiko, V.A., Faenov, A.Ya., Pikuz, S.A. and Safronova, U.I. 1977, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 181, 107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grineva, Yu.I., Karev, V.I., Korneev, V.V., Krutov, V.V., Mandelstam, S.L., Vainstein, L.A., Sasilyev, B.N., and Zhitnik, I.A. 1973, Solar Phys. 29, 441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Källne, E., Kaline, J., and Rice, J.E. 1982, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ljepojevic, N.N., Hutcheon, R.J., and McWhirter, R.W.P. 1984, J. Phys. B. 17, 3057.Google Scholar
Vinogradov, A.V., Skobelev, I.Yu. and Yukov, E.A. 1977, Fiz. Plazmy. 3, 686.Google Scholar
Wiese, W.L., Smith, M.W., and Glenon, B.M. 1966, Atomie Transition Probabilities Vol. 1 NSRDS-N3S4 (US Gov. Printing Office).Google Scholar