Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-12T18:41:43.360Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Physics of Meteors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

Z. Ceplecha
Z. Ceplecha*
Affiliation:
Academy of Sciences, 251 65 Ondřejov Observatory., Czech Republic

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Interaction of a meteoroid penetrating the atmosphere can be described through its motion, ablation, luminosity, ionization and the geometry of its trajectory. A theoretical description may be based on the so called “single body theory”, generalized to allow for discrete fragmentation. Such a concept is fully able to simulate the motion and ablation (mass loss) of meteoroids from millimeter to meter sizes recorded through photographic techniques (the best precision of such observations is better than ±10 m in observed heights). Observed distances and heights as a function of time can be fit to this model with the intrinsic precision of the geometrical data. The majority of meteoroids follow the “single-body theory” closely: large values of the ablation coefficients derived from observations favor continuous fragmentation under very low dynamical pressures as the main process of ablation. The rest, some 20 to 30%, can be described by one or more discrete fragmentation points in addition to continuous fragmentation. Dynamic pressures at these grossfragmentation points are also very low, if compared with the strength of stony meteorites.

On the other hand, luminosity and ionization are not as well understood. Existing detailed spectral records show mostly radiation in form of emission lines of ablated meteoroid material with excitation temperatures in the range of 3000 to 5000 K. Additional theoretical modeling is called for.

Photographically documented meteorite falls can be used for computation of luminous efficiencies, because the terminal mass and bulk density are known in these cases. Recently, photographs of the Lost City meteorite fall were remeasured with special attention to visible trails of fragments. The new analysis revealed two main discrete fragmentation points that are in perfect agreement with the geometrically resolved trails based on the dynamics. Moreover, Adolfsson (1996) found an artificial periodic signal originating from the switching shutter and after removing this signal, he was able to find an initial rotation period of 3.3±0.3 s and also the rotation phase of the Lost City meteoroid. A solution for the motion, ablation and rotation of the Lost City meteoroid is now completely self-consistent throughout the whole photographed trajectory and yields an initial mass of m = 163 ± 5 kg. The luminous efficiency was found to be 6.1% at v = 13 km/s (for 4500 K), this is ∼ 10x larger than the values determined from artificial meteors, i.e., from masses of 1 g fired downward from high-altitude rockets by shaped-charge.

Type
II. Meteors
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 150: Physics, Chemistry and Dynamics of Interplanetary Dust , 1996 , pp. 53 - 64
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of the Pacific 1996

References

Adolfsson, L. 1996, ‘Rotation of meteors: Lost City', Icarus (in print)Google Scholar
Ayers, W.G., McCrosky, R.E., Shao, C.-Y. 1970, Smithson. Astrophys. Spec. Rep. 317 Google Scholar
Baggaley, J. 1995, ‘Recent Results from the AMOR Facility’, oral presentation at IAU Colloquium No. 150, Gainesville, USA Google Scholar
Borovička, J., 1993, A&A, 279, 627 Google Scholar
Borovička, J. 1994a, Planet. Space Sci., 42, 145 Google Scholar
Borovička, J. 1994b, A&AS, 103, 83 Google Scholar
Bronshten, V.A. 1983, ‘Physics of Meteoric Phenomena’, Geophys. Astrophys. Monographs, D.Reidel, Dordrecht Google Scholar
Brown, P., Ceplecha, Z., Hawkes, R.L., Wetherill, G., Beech, M., & Mossman, K.: 1994, Nature 367, 624 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ceplecha, Z. 1975, Bull. Astron. Inst. Czechosl. 36, 242 Google Scholar
Ceplecha, Z. 1995, in Earth, Moon and Planets, ed. Porubcan, V., (Internat. Conf. ‘Meteoroids’, Bratislava, Aug 1994)Google Scholar
Ceplecha, Z. 1996, A&A('Luminous efficiency based on photographic observations of Lost City fireball …', submitted)Google Scholar
Ceplecha, et al. 1997, in “Interplanetary Dust”, eds. Grün, E., Dermott, S., Fechtig, H., Gustafson, B., The University of Arizona Press, Tucson Google Scholar
Ceplecha, Z. & McCrosky, R.E. 1976, J Geophys. Res. 81, 6257 Google Scholar
Ceplecha, Z., & McCrosky, R.E. 1996, ‘Prairie Network Fireballs: Data on Height, Distance, and Brightness for Each Measured Time-Mark’, Icarus (submitted)Google Scholar
Ceplecha, Z., Spurný, P., Borovička, J., Keclíková, J. 1993, A&A, 279, 615 Google Scholar
Halliday, I., Blackwell, A.T., Griffin, A.A. 1978, J. Roy Astron. Soc. Canada 72, 15 Google Scholar
Halliday, I., Griffin, A.A., Blackwell, A.T. 1981, Meteoritics 16, 153 Google Scholar
Hills, J G., & Goda, M. P. 1993, AJ, 105, 1114 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoppe, J. 1937, Astronomische Nachrichten 262, 169 Google Scholar
Kaiser, T.R. 1953, ‘Radio Echo Studies of Meteor Ionization', Phil. Mag. Suppl. 2, 495 Google Scholar
Kaiser, T.R. 1955, Spec. Suppl. J. Atm. Terr. Phys. 2, 55 Google Scholar
Levin (Lewin), B.J. 1961, ‘Physikalische Theorie der Meteore und die meteorische Substanz im Sonnensystem’, Sciencia Astronomica 4, Akademie Verlaf, Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
McCord, T.B., Morris, J., Persing, D., Tagliaferri, E., Jacobs, C., Spalding, R., Grady, L., Schmidt, R. 1995, J. Geophys. Res. 100, 3245 Google Scholar
Tagliaferri, E. 1995, ‘Satellite Observations of Large Meteoroid Impacts’, Report at ‘Workshop on Satellite Observation of Meteoroid Impacts into the Atmosphere’, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, May 1995Google Scholar
McCrosky, R.E. 1958, AJ, 63, 97 Google Scholar
McCrosky, R.E., Posen, A., Schwartz, G., Shao, C.-Y 1971, J. Geophys. Res. 76, 4090 Google Scholar
Nemchinov, I.V 1995, ‘Analysis of the 12 February 1947 Event’, Report at ‘Workshop on Satellite Observation of Meteoroid Impacts into the Atmosphere’, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, May 1995Google Scholar
Nemchinov, I.V., Popova, O.P., Shuvalov, V.V., Svetsov, V.V. 1994, Planet. Space Sci. 42, 491 Google Scholar
Nemchinov, I.V., Popova, O.P., Shuvalov, V.V., Svetsov, V.V. 1995, Solar System Research 28, No. 2, p. 1 Google Scholar
Nemchinov, I.V., Setzer, J.I. 1995, ‘Preliminary Analysis of the Electromagnetic Phenomena Caused by a Meteoroid Impact onto the Atmosphere’, Report at ‘workshop on Satellite Observation of Meteoroid Impacts into the Atmosphere’, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, May 1995Google Scholar
Öpik, E.J. 1922, Veröff. Dorpat 25, No. 1, p. 32 Google Scholar
Öpik, E.J. 1933, Acta Commentat. Univ. Tartuen A26, No. 2, p. 1 Google Scholar
Öpik, E.J 1937, Pub. Obs. Astron. Tartu 29, No. 5, p. 1 Google Scholar
Öpik, E.J 1955, Proc. Roy. Soc. A230, No. 1183, p. 463 Google Scholar
Pecina, P 1995, ‘On the Determination of Velocities of Radar Meteors’, IAU Coll. 150, Gainesville, Aug 1995Google Scholar
Pecina, P., Ceplecha, Z. 1983, Bull. Astron. Inst. Czechosl. 34, 102 Google Scholar
Pecina, P., Ceplecha, Z. 1984, Bull. Astron. Inst. Czechosl. 35, 120 Google Scholar
ReVelle, d.o., 1979, J. Atm. Terr. Phys. 41, 453 Google Scholar
Šimek, M. 1995, ‘Fragmenting Particles during 1989 - 1994 Perseid Radar Observations', IAU Coll. 150, Gainesville, Aug 1995Google Scholar
Whipple, F.L. 1954, Photographic Meteor Studies I, Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc. 79, 499 Google Scholar