No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 April 2016
New observations of the variables in M15 have been made with the Yale 40-in. reflector for the study of periods and period changes.
Since the counting of cycles from the time of Bailey’s observations to the present day cannot always be made unambiguously, there is a corresponding uncertainty in the nature and amount of the period changes. Good lightcurves are obtained even when the periods used for their reduction are incorrect because the number of cycles in a day, or in a month, or in a year, is wrong by one. When this happens, however, period changes are likely to be indicated, and these will be spurious.
Nevertheless, it can be shown that the periods of most variables have not been constant during the interval 1900–1970.
The situation could be improved if a relatively small number of plates were to be obtained each year for several decades, preferably with the same instrument. Individual accuracy could be improved by the use of the electronic camera.
The full contents of this paper will be published elsewhere.
You have
Access