Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:27:53.246Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Observations and Models of Star Formation in the Tidal Features of Interacting Galaxies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

John F. Wallin
Affiliation:
Space Science Division, Naval Research Laboratory
James M. Schombert
Affiliation:
Dept. of Astronomy, Univ. of Michigan
Curtis Struck-Marcell
Affiliation:
Astronomy Program, Dept. of Physics, Iowa State University

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Multi-color surface photometry (BVri) is presented for the tidal features in a sample of interacting galaxies. Large color variations are found between the morphological components and within the individual components. The blue colors in the primary and the tidal features are most dramatic in B-V, and not in V- i indicating that star formation instead of metallicity or age dominates the colors. Color variations between components is larger in systems shortly after interaction begins and diminishes to a very low level in systems which are merged. Photometric models for interacting systems are presented which suggest that a weak burst of star formation in the tidal features could cause the observed color distributions. Dynamical models indicate that compression occurs during the development of tidal features causing an increase in the local density by a factor of between 1.5 and 5. Assuming this density increase can be related to the star formation rate by a Schmidt law, the density increases observed in the dynamical models may be responsible for the variations in color seen in some of the interacting systems. Limitations of the dynamical models are also discussed.

Type
IX. Theory of Interaction Stimulated Effects
Copyright
Copyright © NASA 1990

References

Arp, H. C. (1966), Atlas of Peculiar Galaxies, (Pasadena: California Institute of Technology).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bushouse, H. A. (1986), A. J., 91 255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hummel, E. (1981), Astron. Astrophys., 96 111.Google Scholar
Keel, W. C., Kennicutt, R. C. Jr., Hummel, E., and van der Hulst, J. M. (1985), A. J., 90 708.Google Scholar
Larson, R. B. and Tinsley, B. M. (1978), Ap. J., 219 46.Google Scholar
Noguchi, M. and Ishibashi, S. (1986), M. N. R. A. S., 219 305.Google Scholar
Schmidt, M. (1959), Ap. J., 129 243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schombert, J. M., Wallin, J. F., and Struck-Marcell, C. (1990), to be appear in A. J.Google Scholar
Schweizer, F. (1978), in Structure and Properties of Nearby Galaxies, eds. Berkhuijsen, E. M. and Wielebinski, R. (Dordrecht: D. Reidel) p. 279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soifer, B.T., Houck, J. R., and Neugebauer, G. 1987, Annual Reviews of Astronomy and Astrophysics 25, ed. Burbridge, G., Layzer, D., Phillips, J. G., p. 187.Google Scholar
Toomre, A. and Toomre, J. (1972), Ap. J., 178 623.Google Scholar
Wallin, J. F. (1989). Dynamical and Photometric Evolutionary Models of Tidal Tails and Shells, Ph.D. Thesis, Iowa State University.Google Scholar
Wallin, J. F. (1990), Dynamical and Photometric Evolutionary Models of Tidal Tails, to be submitted to A. J.CrossRefGoogle Scholar