Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T15:35:35.244Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Novae and Accretion Disc Evolution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

G.T. Bath
G.T. Bath*
Affiliation:
Department of Astrophysics South Parks Road Oxford 0X1 3RQ, U.K.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

At outburst the classical nova generates an extended optically-thick wind driven by radiation pressure in the continuum. At maximum light the optical luminosity is close to the Eddington-limit. The subsequent decline illustrates the interaction between radiation and matter in a wind which gradually thins as the mass loss rate falls at an approximately constant Eddington-limit luminosity. As the wind thins so the effective photosphere shrinks back into the underlying binary, and an increasing fraction of the radiation is emitted at ultraviolet wavelengths. Model atmosphere computations show how the increasing flux of ultraviolet photons is associated with the shell becoming more and more ionized through radiative ionization. Attempts to study the internal structure of the wind confirm that the luminosity must be close to the Eddington limit and must be expelled from close to the white dwarf surface. It is generally agreed that the outbursts are caused by runaway nuclear burning of accreted material at the white dwarf surface, but it is possible that some events of the classical nova type may be caused by runaway accretion at a super-critical rate.

In dwarf novae very different behaviour is evident. The outbursts are located within the accretion disc and are generated either by mass-transfer bursts due to dynamical instability of the Roche-lobe filling star, or by an instability within the disc itself. In either case the eruption behaviour is due to an enhanced accretion flux through the accretion disc. One important aspect of the radiation hydrodynamics is the luminosity generated by impact of the mass-transfer stream with the accretion disc and penetration by the stream within the disc. Attempts at examining this penetration region are described and results compared with observed behaviour of disc evolution through the course of an outburst. The possibility that disc instabilities will not propogate in realistic discs which deviate from axial symmetry is considered.

Type
5. Novae and Accretion Disks
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 89: Radiation Hydrodynamics in Stars and Compacts Objects , 1986 , pp. 269 - 279
Copyright
Copyright © Springer-Verlag 1986

References

1. Pike., S.R.: Mon.Not. Roy. astr. Soc. 89, 538 (1929)Google Scholar
2. Gerasimovic., B.P.: The Observatory, 60, 165 (1937)Google Scholar
3. Cowling., T.G.: The Observatory, 60, 167 (1937)Google Scholar
4. Whipple., F.L. and Payne-Gaposhkin, C.: Harvard Coll. Circ. 413, 1 (1937)Google Scholar
5. Grotrian, W.: Zeits, fur Astrophys. 13, 215 (1937)Google Scholar
6. Friedjung, M.: Mon.Not.Roy.astr.Soc. 131, 447 (1966)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Bath., G.T. and Shaviv, G.: Mon.Not.Roy.astr.Soc. 175, 305 (1976)Google Scholar
8. Arp., H.C.: Astr. Journal, 61, 51 (1956)Google Scholar
9. Rosino, L.: in Novae, novoides, et supernovae, Editions du Centre Nat. Res. Scientifique, Paris (1965)Google Scholar
10. Gallagher., J.S. and Code., A.D.: Astrophys. J. 189, 303 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Gallagher., J.S. and Starrfield., S.G.: Mon.Not.Roy.astr.Soc. 176, 53 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Bath., G.T.: Mon.Not.Roy.astr.Soc. 182, 35 (1978)Google Scholar
13. McLaughlin., D.B.: in Stars and Stellar Systems - VI Stellar Atmospheres, Chicago, University of Chicago Press (1960)Google Scholar
14. Ruggles, C.L.N. and Bath., G.T.: Astr. and Astrophys. 80, 97 (1979)Google Scholar
15. Kato, M.: Pub.Astr.Soc. Japan 35, 507 (1983)Google Scholar
16. Marlborough., J.M. and Roy., J.R.: Astrophys.J. 160, 221 (1970)Google Scholar
17. Ferland., G.J. and Younger., J.W.: Astrophys.J. 251, L17 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Harkness., R.P.: Mon.Not.Roy.astr.Soc. 204, 45 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Cassinelll., J.P.: Astrophys.J. 165, 265 (1971)Google Scholar
20. Gebbie., K.B.: Mon.Not.Roy.astr.Soc. 135, 181 (1967)Google Scholar
21. Lightman., A.P.: Astrophys.J. 194, 419 (1974)Google Scholar
22. Bath, G.T., Edwards, A.C. and Mantle., V.J.: Mon.Not.Roy.astr.Soc. 205, 171 (1983)Google Scholar
23. Hassall, B., Hill, P., Czerny, A., Pringle, J.E., Wade, R. and Whelan., J.A.J.: Mon.Not.Roy.astr.Soc. 203, 865 (1983)Google Scholar
24. Bailey, J.: J.Brit.Astron.Soc. 86, 30 (1975)Google Scholar