Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T17:54:08.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Model Calculations and Spectroscopic Constrains for SN1987A

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

P. Höflich*
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Physikund Astrophysik, Institut für Astrophysik, Karl Schwarzschild Str. 1, 8046 Garching, FRG

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We present synthetic spectra for atmospheres in order to interpret the observed spectra of the supernova 1987A during the first few months after the initial event. Spherical symmetry and density profiles are assumed which are given by the homologous expansion of the stellar structure of a B3 supergiant. For hydrogen, up to eight levels and, for helium, 16 levels are allowed to deviate from LTE. The radiation transport is calculated consistently with the rate equations both for the continua and for the lines. Radiative equilibrium is assumed. The observed spectra and colours in the optical wavelength range can be well reproduced by pure hydrogen models during the first few weeks. The behaviour of the UV flux is due to changes in the effective temperature and the photospheric radius. For later stages, the influence of elements other than hydrogen and helium must be taken into account in order to compare the calculated and observed spectra in the optical wavelength range. Reasonable agreement between calculations and observations can be obtained with the assumption of half solar abundances for all elements but for the s-process elements Sc, Ti and Ba which are overabundant. To explain the small changes in the spectra after about 3 weeks up to 4 months, we need a total hydrogen mass of about 8 to 10 M.

Type
Part III. Chemical and Dynamical Structures of Exploding Stars
Copyright
Copyright © Springer-Verlag 1988

References

Arnett, W.D. Astrophys.J. 319 136 (1987)Google Scholar
Falk, S.W.; Arnett, W.D. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 33 515 (1977)Google Scholar
Hillebrandt, W.; Hõflich, P.; Truran, J.W.; Weiss, A. Nature 327 597 (1987)Google Scholar
Hõflich, P. Proceedings of the 4th workshop on Nuclear Astrophysics Ringberg (1987a)Google Scholar
Hõflich, P. Proceedings of the ESO-workshop on SN1987A Munich (1987b)Google Scholar
Hõflich, P.; Wehrse, R.; Shaviv, G. Astron. Astrophys. 163 105 (1986)Google Scholar
Johnson, H.L. Ann.Rev.Astron.Astrophys. 4 197 (1966)Google Scholar
Maeder, A. Proceedings of the ESO-workshop on SN1987a (1987)Google Scholar
Menzies, J.W. et al. Spectroscopie and photometric observations of SN1987A. The first 50 days preprint (1987)Google Scholar
Mihalas, D.; Kunasz, R.B.; Hummer, D.G. Astrophys.J. 202 465 (1975)Google Scholar
Nomoto, K. personal communication (1987)Google Scholar
Nomoto, K.; Shigeyama, T.; Hashimoto, M. Proceedings of the ESO-workshop on SN1987A Munich (1987)Google Scholar
Schmid-Burgk, J. Astron.Astrophys. 40 149 (1975)Google Scholar
Sedov, L.I. Similarity and Dimensional Methods in Mechanics, Academic Press, New York p. 260 (1959)Google Scholar
Truran, J.W. Proceedings of the ESO-workshop on SN1987A Munich (1987)Google Scholar
Wampler, E.J.; Truran, J.W.; Lucy, L.B.; Höflich, P.; and Hillebrandt, W. Astron. Astrophys. 182 L51 (1987)Google Scholar
Woosley, S.E.; Pinto, P.A.; Martin, P.G.; Weaver, T.A. Astrophys.J. 318 664 (1987)Google Scholar