Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-13T10:41:26.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Magnetic Field Reconnection as a Possible Source of Nonthermal Processes in Accreting Relativistic Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

L.A. Pustil’nik
L.A. Pustil’nik*
Affiliation:
Observatory of the Jordan Valley Regional College, 15132, Israel

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Recent observations of the EGRET-telescope aboard the Compton Gamma Ray Observatory (CGRO), results from Čerenkov shower telescopes, and fast variability studies have demonstrated the dominant role of nonther mal processes for some accreting relativistic objects. This is perhaps an unex pected result, because the basic assumption of the standard accretion models (Shakura & Sunyaev 1973, Sunyaev & Titarchuk 1980, Galeev et al. 1979) is the thermal nature of all processes that determine the energy output. At the same time, the recent observations argue that the source of the emission is not the thermal plasma as a whole, but a very small fraction of charged particles accelerated to very high energy (ε/mc2 > (30-1000) with a “universal” energy spectrum nε ∣ ε−α. These observational results suggest a revison of the global approach to the accretion process to find any new (or forgotten “old”) energy conversion mechanisms with predominately nonthermal output (Lynden-Bell 1969, Ikhsanov & Pustil’nik 1994).

The nature of the energy source and mechanisms of energy conversion to either plasma heating (“thermal” mode) or to acceleration of charged particles (“nonthermal” mode) is the main question for accretion theories.

Type
Theory of Flares
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 151: Flares and Flashes , 1995 , pp. 197 - 200
Copyright
Copyright © Springer-Verlag 1995

References

Bartolini, C., Piccioni, A., Beskin, G., Neizvestny, S., 1994, ApJS 92, 455 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beskin, G.M., et al.: 1983, Sov. Astron. Lett. 14, 156 Google Scholar
Dreicer, H., 1959, Phys. Rev. 115, 238 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fermi, E., 1949, Phys. Rev. 75, 1169 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galeev, A.A., Rosner, R., Vaiana, G.S., 1979, ApJ 229, 318 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartman, R.C., et al., 1992, ApJ 385, L1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurley, K., et al., 1994, Nature 372, 652 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikhsanov, N.R., Pustil’nik, L.A., 1994, ApJS 90, 959 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynden-Bell, D., 1969, Nature 233, 690 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meintjes, P.J., 1992, ApJ 401, 325 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meekins, J.F., 1984, ApJ 278, 288 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothschild, R.E., Bodt, E.A., Holt, S.S., Serlemitsos, P.J., 1974, ApJ 189, L13 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shakura, N.I., Sunyaev, R.A., 1973, A&A 24, 337 Google Scholar
Sunyaev, R.A., Titarchuk, L.G., 1980, A&A 86, 121 Google Scholar