Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T08:02:59.163Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Light Scattering by Solar System Dust: The Opposition Effect and the Reversal of Polarization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

K. Muinonen
Affiliation:
Lowell Observatory, 1400 West Mars Hill Road, Flagstaff, Arizona 86001, U.S.A.
K. Lumme
Affiliation:
University of Helsinki, Observatory and Astrophysics Laboratory, Tähtitorninmäki, 00130 Helsinki, Finland

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The opposition effect and the reversal of linear polarization, or negative polarization, at small phase angles have been almost universally observed in light scattered from atmosphereless solar system bodies (e.g., Seeliger 1887, Lyot 1929). Recent investigations have indicated that both phenomena can be qualitatively understood as resulting from a common physical mechanism: coherent multiple backscattering (Shkuratov 1989, Muinonen 1989). These findings have cast doubt on the hitherto accepted explanation that mutual shadowing alone is responsible for the opposition effect, and for the first time offer an acceptable interpretation of the polarization reversal near opposition. As for interplanetary dust, the coherent backscattering mechanism contributes both to the Gegenschein and to the almost certainly existing negative polarization branch (Roosen 1970, Lumme and Bowell 1985).

In the following, theoretical results supporting the coherent backscattering explanation are briefly presented. As future work, we suggest modeling light scattering by a particulate medium to include the first, second and, if necessary, higher orders of scattering in the range below the typical particle size.

Type
Interplanetary Dust: Zodiacal Light and Optical Studies
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1991

References

Bruning, J.H., and Lo, Y. T. (1971). Multiple scattering of EM waves by spheres, parts I and II. IEEE Trans. Ant. Prop. AP-19, 378.Google Scholar
Lumme, K., and Bowell, E. (1985). Photometric properties of zodiacal light particles. Icarus 62, 54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lumme, K., Peltoniemi, J.I., and Irvine, W. M. (1990). Diffuse reflection from a stochastically bounded, semi-infinite medium. Trans. Theory Stat. Phys., in press.Google Scholar
Lyot, B. (1929). Recherches sur la polarisation de la lumière des planètes et de quelques substances terrestres. Ann. Obs. Paris 8(1), 1.Google Scholar
Muinonen, K. (1989). Electromagnetic scattering by two interacting dipoles. Proc. 1989 URSI Symp. EM Theory, 428.Google Scholar
Muinonen, K. (1990a). Light scattering by inhomogeneous media: backward enhancement and reversal of linear polarization. Ph.D thesis, Report 3/1990, Observatory and Astrophysics Laboratory, University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Muinonen, K. (1990b). Scattering of bght by solar system dust: the coherent backscatter phenomenon. 1990 Proc. Finnish Astron. Soc., 12.Google Scholar
Muinonen, K. O., Sihvola, A.H., Lindell, I.V., and Lumme, K. A. (1990). Scattering by a small object close to an interface. II: Study of backscattering. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, in Press.Google Scholar
Roosen, R.G. (1970). The Gegenschein and interplanetary dust outside the Earth’s orbit. Icarus 13, 184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seeliger, H. von (1887). Zur Theorie der Beleuchtung der grossen Planeten, insbesondere des Saturn. Abh. Bayer. Akad. Wiss. Math. Naturwiss., Kl. 16, 405.Google Scholar
Shkuratov, Yu. G. (1989). New mechanism of the negative polarization of light scattered by atmosphereless cosmic bodies (in Russian). Astron. Vestnik 23, 2, 176.Google Scholar