Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T19:38:48.245Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

High-Resolution Narrow-Field Versus Low-Resolution Wide-Field Observations of Galaxies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

M. Capaccioli ,
E. Davoust ,
G. Lelièvre  and
J.-L. Nieto
M. Capaccioli
Affiliation:
Istituto di Astronomia, Università di Padova
E. Davoust
Affiliation:
Observatoire de Besançon
G. Lelièvre
Affiliation:
CFHT Corporation and Observatoire de Paris
J.-L. Nieto
Affiliation:
Observatoire du Pic du Midi et de Toulouse

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

There is an increasing evidence that small-scale phenomena occuring in the inner regions of galaxies are related to large-scale phenomena such as, e.g., merging or violent interactions between galaxies. Plausible scenarios (e.g. Rees, 1978) involve, for instance, accumulation of material from the outside along the accretion disk of a black hole and subsequent ejection in two opposite directions into the intergalactic medium. Active galaxies and QSO's may be the extreme examples of the link between large-scale phenomena contributing to the evolution of gala, xies. Moderately active or even normal galaxies are also submitted to entangled events on both scales. The aim of this communication is to illustrate the complementarity between high-resolution, small-field telescopes and Schmidt-type telescopes for the study of this phenomenology, and to stimulate further research by a few challenging examples.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 78: Astronomy with Schmidt-type telescopes , 1984 , pp. 379 - 382
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1984

References

Barbon, R., Benacchio, L., Capaccioli, M., 1978, Astron. Astrophys. 65 165.Google Scholar
Benacchio, L., Capaccioli, M., de Biase, G., Santin, P., Sedmak, G., 1983, Preprint.Google Scholar
Capaccioli, M., 1983, Mem. SAIt., in press.Google Scholar
Davoust, E., Lelièvre, G., Nieto, J.-L., 1983, in preparation.Google Scholar
de Vaucouleurs, G., Capaccioli, M., 1979, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 40, 699.Google Scholar
Jones, C., Forman, W., 1982, IAU Symp. 97, 97.Google Scholar
Kormendy, J., 1982, in “Morphology and dynamics of galaxies”, 12th advanced course of the Swiss Society of Astronomy and Astrophysics.Google Scholar
Longo, G., de Vaucouleurs, A., 1983, The University of Texas Monograph in Astronomy n. 3. Google Scholar
Nieto, J.-L., Vidal, J.-L., 1983, preprint.Google Scholar
Rees, M., 1978, Nature, 275, 516.Google Scholar
Schweizer, F., Whitmore, B.C., Rubin, V.C., 1983, Astron. J. 88, 909.Google Scholar
Smith, H.A., 1981, Astron. J. 86, 998.Google Scholar