Hostname: page-component-669899f699-8p65j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-26T06:51:34.869Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Geosynchronous Satellite Orbit Determination

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

Sergei Rudenko
Sergei Rudenko*
Affiliation:
Main Astronomical Observatory, National Acad. of Sciences Golosiiv, Kiev, Ukraine

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The paper presents the results of the orbit determination of geosynchronous satellites derived from 1921 positional observations of a few dozens of satellites obtained at the double wide-angle astrograph DWA (D=0.4m, F=2m) of the Main Astronomical Observatory of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine in 1985–1991. The observations cover the longitude range from 19° W to 80° E. Orbital inclination of the observed objects is less than 3°. The mean values of the rms residuals are 066 in R.A. and 101 in Dec. over all processed orbital arcs.

Type
Dynamics of Artificial Satellites and Space Debris
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 165: Dynamics and Astrometry of Natural and Artificial Celestial Bodies , 1997 , pp. 351 - 354
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1997

References

Kizyun, L.N. and Safronov, Yu.I.: 1995, Catalogue of Positions of the Geostationary and Quasi-Geostationary Earth Satellites, Preprint, Main Astronomical Observatory, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kiev, 121.Google Scholar
Log of Objects Near the Geostationary Ring, Issue 16, ESA/ESOC. February 1996.Google Scholar
McCarthy, D.D., (ed.): 1992, “IERS Standards (1992)”, IERS Tech. Note 13, Obs. de Paris.Google Scholar
Rudenko, S.: 1995, “Software for the analysis of photographic observations of geosynchronous satellites”, in: Accurate Orbit Determination and Observations of High Earth Satellites for Geodynamics, COGEOS Workshop in Walferdange (Elipe, A., Paquet, P., eds), Luxembourg, 63–70.Google Scholar