Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-5wl6q Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-12T07:43:59.725Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Galactic Disk Tidal Force: Simulating the Observed Oort Cloud Comets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

P. A. Dybczyński  and
H. Prȩtka

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In previous papers (Prȩtka and Dybczyński, 1994; Dybczyński and Prȩtka, 1996) we presented detailed analysis of selected examples of the long-term evolution of the orbit of Oort cloud comets under the influence of the galactic disk tidal force, as well as some statistical characteristics of the simulated observable comet population. This paper presents further improvements in our Monte Carlo simulation programme which allow us to represent in a better way the real processes of production of observable comets due to galactic perturbations.

In our second paper (Dybczyński and Prȩtka, 1996), following some other authors (see for example Matese and Whitman, 1989), we treated a comet as observable when its osculating perihelion distance decreased below some adopted observability limit (5 AU in our case). Limiting the investigation to the evolution of osculating elements allowed us to use very fast and efficient averaged Hamiltonian equations of motion in our simulation. However, further detailed analysis of the problem showed that the adopted observability definition was insufficient: what makes a comet observable is not its osculating perihelion distance but its true distance from the Sun, smaller than some adopted threshold value. It may happen that when the osculating perihelion distance is at its smallest, the comet is around its aphelion distance.

Type
Solar System Dynamics
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 165: Dynamics and Astrometry of Natural and Artificial Celestial Bodies , 1997 , pp. 149 - 154
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1997

References

Bahcall, J.N.: 1984, “Self-consistent determinations of the total amount of matter near the Sun”, Astrophys. J. 276, 169–181.Google Scholar
Duncan, M. et al.: 1986, “The formation and extent of the Solar system comet cloud”, Astron. J. 94, 1330–1338.Google Scholar
Dybczyński, P.A. and Prętka, H.: 1996, “The statistical effects of galactic tides on the Oort cloud”, Earth, Moon and Planets 72, 13–18.Google Scholar
Heisler, J.: 1990, “Monte Carlo simulations of the Oort comet cloud”, Icarus 88, 104–121.Google Scholar
Marsden, B.G. and Williams, G.V.: 1996, Catalogue of Cometary Orbits, 11th Ed., Cambridge.Google Scholar
Matese, J.J. and Whitman, P.G.: 1989, “The Galactic disk tidal field and the nonrandom distribution of observed Oort cloud comets”, Icarus 82, 389–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matese, J.J. and Whitman, P.G.: 1992, “A model of the galactic tidal interaction with the Oort comet cloud”, Celest. Mech. & Dyn. Astron. 54, 13.Google Scholar
Prętka, H. and Dybczyński, P.A.: 1994, “The galactic disk influence on the Oort cloud cometary orbits”, in: Dynamics and astrometry of natural and artificial celestial bodies (Kurzyńska, K., Barlier, F., Seidelmann, P.K., Wytrzyszczak, I., eds), Astronomical Observatory, Poznan, 299–304.Google Scholar