Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T16:13:35.133Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Formation of Optical CNO Emission Lines in Cataclysmic Variables

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

Robert E. Williams  and
Donald H. Ferguson
Robert E. Williams
Affiliation:
Steward Observatory, University of Arizona
Donald H. Ferguson
Affiliation:
Steward Observatory, University of Arizona

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Spectroscopic observations of CNO emission lines are presented for old nova systems, and possible excitation processes for the lines are considered. The Bowen fluorescence mechanism cannot generally be responsible for the strength of N III λ4640 because of the weakness of 0 III λ3429. Other CNO lines are observed which indicate that all of the lines are excited by resonance fluorescence of UV continuum radiation. Several nonfluorescent excited lines of carbon are also present in old novae, probably formed by recombination processes. The available data for the optical CNO lines suggest that non-solar CNO enhancements exist in quiescent novae, indicating that some of the binary systems may be evolved.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 72: Cataclysmic Variables and Related Objects , 1983 , pp. 97 - 115
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1983

References

Bashkin, S., and Stoner, J.O. 1975, Atomic Energy Levels and Grotrian Diagrams (Amsterdam: North-Holland).Google Scholar
Bowen, I.S. 1935, Ap. J., 81, 1.Google Scholar
Canizares, C.R., McClintock, J.E., and Grindlay, J.E. 1979, Ap. J., 234, 556.Google Scholar
Castor, J.I., and Nussbaumer, H. 1972, MNRAS, 155, 293.Google Scholar
Ferland, G.J., Lambert, D.L., McCall, M.J., Shields, G.A., and Slovak, M.H. 1982, Ap. J., 260, in press.Google Scholar
Gilliland, R.L., and Phillips, M.M. 1982, Ap. J., in press.Google Scholar
Hutchings, J.B. 1979, Ap. J., 232, 176.Google Scholar
Hutchings, J.B., Cowley, A.P., and Crampton, D. 1979, Ap. J., 232, 500.Google Scholar
Jameson, R.F., King, A.R., and Sherrington, M.R. 1980, MNRAS, 191, 559.Google Scholar
Kaler, J.B. 1967, Ap. J., 149, 383.Google Scholar
Kurucz, R.L., and Peytremann, E. 1975, A Table of Semiempirical gf Values, Smithsonian Astrophys. Observ. Special Report No. 362.Google Scholar
Margon, B., and Cohen, J.G. 1978, Ap. J. (Letters), 222, L33.Google Scholar
McClintock, J.E., Canizares, C.R., and Tarter, C.B. 1975, Ap. J., 198, 641.Google Scholar
Seaton, M.J. 1960, Repts. Prog. Phys., 23, 313.Google Scholar
Seaton, M.J. 1978, in IAU Symp. No. 76: Planetary Nebulae, ed. Terzian, Y. (Dordrecht: Reidel), p. 131.Google Scholar
Storey, P.J. 1981, MNRAS, 195, 27P.Google Scholar
Wiese, W.L., Smith, M.W., and Glennon, B.M. 1966, Atomic Transition Probabilities (Washington: USGPO), Vol. 1, NSRDS-NBS 4.Google Scholar
Williams, R.E. 1982, Ap. J., 261, in.press.Google Scholar
Williams, R.E., and Ferguson, D.H. 1982, Ap. J., 257, 672.Google Scholar