Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T02:21:23.311Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Excitation of Polar Motion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

Clark R. Wilson
Clark R. Wilson*
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences Center for Space Research andInstitute for Geophysics University of Texas Austin, Austin TX 78712, USA

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Conceptual models of polar motion have evolved over the past century, as improved data revealed signals over progressively wider frequency bands. In the 1890s, Chandler represented polar motion as a sum of discrete components, 14 month and annual terms, and this component model effectively summarized the observations, but did not provide a physical explanation for them. Over time both the search for a physical understanding of polar motion, and the ability to observe the broad band continuum outside the Chandler and annual bands have led to an understanding of polar motion as a continuum of variations, not adequately described by a few discrete components. The continuum concept is now the working model in most studies of polar motion. The transition from component to continuum conceptual models preceded the arrival of high quality data by several decades, and reflected significant contributions from Harold Jeffreys. With modern space geodetic observations and good global numerical models of the atmosphere, oceans, and other climate processes, it is clear that air and water motion and redistribution are the dominant contributors to the excitation continuum.

Type
Part 5. Chandler and Annual Polar Motion: Observations and Excitation
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 178: Polar Motion: Historical and Scientific Problems , 2000 , pp. 411 - 420
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of the Pacific 2000

References

Chen, J.L., Wilson, C.R., Chambers, D.P., Nerem, R.S., and Tapley, B.D., 1998. Seasonal global water mass balance and mean sea level variations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 15 (19), 3555–3558.Google Scholar
Jeffreys, H., 1916, Causes Contributory to the Annual Variation of Latitude, Monthly Notices Royal Astronomical Society, 76, 499–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeffreys, H., 1940. The Variation of Latitude. Monthly Notices Royal Astronomical Society, 100, 139–155.Google Scholar
Jeffreys, H., 1968. The Variation of Latitude, Monthly Notices Royal Astronomical Society, 141, 255–268.Google Scholar
Munk, W. and MacDonald, G., 1960. The Rotation of the Earth, a Geophysical Discussion, Cambridge University Press, 323 pp.Google Scholar
Munk, W., and Hassan, E., 1961. Atmospheric Excitation of the Earth’s Wobble, Geophysical Journal Royal Astronomical Society, 4, 339.Google Scholar
Wilson, C. and Haubrich, R., 1976. Meteorological Excitation of the Earth’s Wobble, Geophysical Journal Royal Astronomical Society, 46, 707.Google Scholar
Wilson, C., 1985, Discrete Polar Motion Equations, Geophysical Journal Royal Astronomical Society, 80, 551–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, C. and Vicente, R., 1990. Maximum Likelihood Estimates of Polar Motion Parameters, American Geophysical Union Geophysical Monograph 59, Variations in Earth Rotation, McCarthy, D. and Carter, W. Editors.Google Scholar
Wilson, C., and Chen, J., 1996. Discrete Polar Motion Equations for High Frequencies. Journal of Geodesy., v. 70, no. 9.Google Scholar
Vicente, R., and Wilson, C., 1997, On the Variability of Earth Rotation Parameters, Journal of Geophysical Research, 102, B9, 20439–20445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar