Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:30:14.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

End Products of Cometary Evolution: Cometary Origin of Earth-Crossing Bodies of Asteroidal Appearance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

G.W. Wetherill
G.W. Wetherill*
Affiliation:
Department of Terrestrial Magnetism, CarnegieInstitution of Washington 5241 Broad Branch Road, N. W., Washington, D.C. 20015

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Because there is no necessary connection between the time required to remove the volatile component of a cometary nucleus by solar heating (physical lifetime) and the dynamical lifetime of a comet, it is possible that a comet may evolve into an observable object of asteroidal appearance. Almost all comets have dynamical lifetimes much shorter than their physical lifetimes and in these cases complete loss of volatiles will not occur. Mechanisms do exist, however, whereby a small but significant fraction of comets will have longer dynamical lifetimes, permitting them to evolve first into Jupiter-family short period comets and then into comets with relatively safe decoupled orbits interior to Jupiter’s orbit. Observed Jupiter-family objects of asteroidal appearance (e.g., 1983SA) are much more likely to be of cometary rather than asteroidal origin. “Decoupling” is facilitated by several mechanisms: perturbations by the terrestrial planets, perturbations by Jupiter and the other giant planets (including resonant perturbations) and non-gravitational orbital changes caused by the loss of gas and dust from the comet. The dynamical time scale for decoupling is probably 105–106 years and almost all decoupled comets are likely to be of asteroidal appearance. Once decoupled, the orbits of the resulting Apollo-Amor objects will evolve on a longer (107–108 year) time scale, and the orbital evidence for these objects having originally been comets rather than asteroids will nearly disappear. Statistically, however, a large fraction of the bodies in deep Earth-crossing orbits with semi-major axes ≳ 2.2 AU are likely to be cometary objects in orbits that have not yet diffused into the steady state distribution. For plausible values of the relevant parameters, estimates can be made of the number of cometary Apollo-Amor “asteroids,” the observed number of Earthcrossing active and inactive short period comets, and the production rate of short period comets. These estimates are compatible with other theoretical and observational inferences that suggest the presence of a significant population of Apollo objects that formerly were active comets.

Type
Section III: Comets, Origins, and Evolution
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 116 , Issue 1: Comets in the Post-Halley Era , 1989 , pp. 537 - 556
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1991

References

Arnold, J.R. (1965) The origin of meteorites as small bodies. II. The model, III. General considerations, Astrophys. J. 141, 1536–1556.Google Scholar
Campins, H., A’Hearn, M.F., Schleicher, D.G., and Millis, R.L. (1988) The nucleus of comet P/Tempel 2, Bull. Amer. Astron. Soc. 20 (abstract).Google Scholar
Duncan, M., Quinn, T., and Tremaine, S. (1987) The formation and extent of the solar system comet cloud, Astrophys. J. 94, 1330–1338.Google Scholar
Duncan, M., Quinn, T., and Tremarne, S.D. (1988) The origin of short period comets, Astrophys. J. 328, L69–L73.Google Scholar
Everhart, E. (1972) The origin of short period comets, Astrophys. Lett. 10, 131–135.Google Scholar
Everhart, E. (1977) The evolution of comet orbits as perturbed by Uranus and Neptune, in Delsemme, A. H. (ed.), Comets, Asteroids, Meteorites University of Toledo, Toledo, pp. 99–104.Google Scholar
Fernández, J.A. (1980) On the existence of a cometary belt beyond Neptune, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 192, 481–491.Google Scholar
Fernández, J.A., and W.-H., Ip (1983) On the time evolution of the cometary influx in the region of the terrestrial planets, Icarus 54, 377–387.Google Scholar
Fernández, J.A. (1985) Dynamical capture and physical decay of short-period comets, Icarus 64, 308–319.Google Scholar
Grieve, R.A.F., and Dence, M.R. (1979) The terrestrial cratering record II. The crater production rate, Icarus 38, 230–242.Google Scholar
Havnes, O. (1967) The effect of repeated close approaches to Jupiter on short-period comets, Icarus 12, 331–337.Google Scholar
Hills, J.G. (1981) Comet showers and the steady-state infall of comets from the Oort cloud, Astron. J. 86, 1730–1740.Google Scholar
Lecar, M., and Franklin, F.A. (1973) On the original distribution of the asteroids, I, Icarus 20, 422–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsden, B.G. (1985) Nongravitational forces on comets: The first fifteen years, in Carusi, A. and Valsecchi, G. B. (eds.), Dynamics of Comets: Their Origin and Evolution D. Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht, pp. 343–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsden, B. G. (1986) I.A.U. Catalogue of cometary orbits. Smithsonian Astrophysical Obs., Cambridge, Mass. Google Scholar
Milani, A., Hahn, G., Carpino, M., and Nobili, A.M. (1989) Dynamics of planet-crossing asteroids: Classes of orbital behaviour. Project Spaceguard, Icarus 78, 212–269.Google Scholar
Öpik, E.J. (1951) Collision probabilities with the planets and the distribution of inter planetary matter, Proc. Roy. Irish Acad. 54A, 165–199.Google Scholar
Öpik, E.J. (1961) The survival of comets and cometary material, Astron. J. 66, 381–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Öpik, E.J. (1963) Survival of comet nuclei and the asteroids, Advan. Astron. Astrophys. 2, 219–262.Google Scholar
Scholl, H., and Froeschlé, C. H. (1986) The effects of the secular resonances ν16 and ν5 on asteroid orbits, Astron. Astrophys. 170, 134–144.Google Scholar
Sekanina, Z. (1969) Dynamical and evolutionary aspects of gradual deactivation and disintegration of short-period comets, Astron. J. 74, 1223–1234.Google Scholar
Sekanina, Z. (1971) A core-mantle model for cometary nuclei and asteroids of possible cometary origin, in Gehrels, T. (ed.), Physical Studies of Minor Planets, NASA SP-267, pp. 423–428.Google Scholar
Shoemaker, E.M. (1977) Astronomically observable crater-forming projectiles, in Roddy, D. J., Pepin, R.O. and Merrill, R. B. (eds.), Impact and Explosion Cratering Pergamon Press, New York, pp. 617–628.Google Scholar
Shoemaker, E.M., Williams, J.G., Hehn, E.F., and Wolfe, R.F. (1979) Earth-crossing asteroids: orbital classes, collision rates with Earth, and origin, in Gehrels, T. (ed.), Asteroids, Univ. of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 253–282.Google Scholar
Shoemaker, E.M., and Wolfe, R.F. (1984) Evolution of the Uranus-Neptune planetesimal swarm, Lunar Planet. Sci. XV, 780–781.Google Scholar
Stagg, C.R., and Bailey, M.E. (1989) Stochastic capture of short-period comets, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. In press.Google Scholar
Torbett, M.V. (1989) Chaotic motion in a comet disk beyond Neptune: The delivery of short-period comets, Preprint.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weissman, P.R. (1980) Physical loss of long-period comets, Astron. Astrophys. 85, 191–196.Google Scholar
Weissman, P.R. (1986) The Oort cloud and the galaxy, in Smoluchowski, R., Bahcall, J.N. and Matthews, M. S. (eds.), The Galaxy and the Solar System, Univ. of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 204–237.Google Scholar
Weissman, P.R., A’Hearn, M.F., McFadden, L.A., and Rickman, H. (1989) Evolution of comets into asteroids, in press, in Binzel, R., Gehrels, T. and Matthews, M. S. (eds.), Asteroids II, Univ. of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Weissman, P.R. (1989) The cometary impactor flux at the Earth. Preprint of ms. submitted to Proceedings of the conference on global catastrophes in Earth history, Snowbird, Utah, October 1988. In press.Google Scholar
Wetherill, G.W. (1968a) Dynamical studies of asteroidal and cometary orbits and their relation to the origin of meteorites, in Ahrens, L. H. (ed.), Origin and Distribution of the Elements, Pergamon, Oxford, pp. 423–443.Google Scholar
Wetherill, G.W. (1968b) Relationships between orbits and sources of chondritic meteorites, in Millman, P. (ed.), Meteorite Research, D. Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht, pp. 573–589.Google Scholar
Wetherill, G.W. (1979) Steady-state population of Apollo-Amor objects, Icarus 37, 96–112.Google Scholar
Wetherill, G.W. (1985) Asteroidal source of ordinary chondrites, Meteoritics 20, 1–22.Google Scholar
Wetherill, G.W. (1987) Dynamic relationships between asteroids, meteorites, and Apollo-Amor objects, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. of London A323, 323–337.Google Scholar
Wetherill, G.W. (1988) Where do the Apollo objects come from? Icarus 76, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wetherill, G.W. (1989) Cratering of the terrestrial planets by Apollo objects, Meteoritics 24, 15–22.Google Scholar
Wetherill, G.W., and Williams, J.G. (1968) Evaluation of the Apollo asteroids as sources of stone meteorites, J. Geophys. Res. 73, 635–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wetherill, G.W., and Williams, J.G. (1979) Origin of Differentiated Meteorites, in Ahrens, L. H. (ed.), Origin and Distribution of the Elements Pergamon, Oxford, pp. 19–31.Google Scholar
Whipple, F.L. (1950) A comet model I. The acceleration of comet Encke, Astrophys. J. 1ll, 375–394.Google Scholar
Whipple, F.L. (1951) A comet model II. Physical relations for comets and meteors, Astrophys. J. 113, 464–474.Google Scholar
Williams, J.G. (1973) Meteorites from the asteroid belt? (abstract), Eos 54, 233.Google Scholar
Williams, J.G. and Faulkner, J. (1981) The positions of secular resonant surfaces, Icarus 46, 390–399.Google Scholar
Wisdom, J. (1983) Chaotic behavior and the origin of the 3/1 Kirkwood gap, Icarus 56, 51–74.Google Scholar
Wisdom, J. (1985) Meteorites may follow a chaotic route to Earth, Nature 315, 731–733.Google Scholar
Yeomans, D.K. (1988) A new look at cometary nongravitational forces, Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 20, 841–842.Google Scholar