Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T15:36:55.933Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Early Observational Evidence of Polar Motion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

Andreas Verdun  and
Gerhard Beutler
Andreas Verdun
Affiliation:
Astronomical Institute, University of Bern, Sidlerstrasse 5, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland
Gerhard Beutler
Affiliation:
Astronomical Institute, University of Bern, Sidlerstrasse 5, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Bessel was not able to detect significant latitude variations in his observation series made between May 1820 and June 1821 at Königsberg Observatory. He left the topic until July 22, 1843, when he suspected that the latitude might have changed since 1820. Between March 1842 and April 1843 Peters, one of Bessel’s students, performed an observation series of the pole’s zenith distance at the Pulkovo Observatory using new observation techniques and reduction methods first developed by Bessel. From this series he deduced a significant value of 0″.079 ± 0″.017 for the amplitude of polar motion, but he was not able to separate the expected 10 month Eulerian period from an annual signal possibly caused (as he supposed) by seasonal temperature variations. Peters’ successors at Pulkovo, Gyldén and Nyrén, continued to observe latitude. Using these observation series Nyrén derived in 1873 significant values for the amplitude of polar motion, but he was not able to determine the phase angles because he assumed the period of polar motion being known. We conclude that Peters probably was the first one to have observed a variation of the latitude, but that he and Nyrén were misled by the Eulerian period when modeling polar motion.

Type
Part 1. History of Early Polar Motion Research
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 178: Polar Motion: Historical and Scientific Problems , 2000 , pp. 67 - 82
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of the Pacific 2000

References

Ambronn, L., 1899, Handbuch der astronomischen Instrumentenkunde, 2 Vols., Berlin, Springer.Google Scholar
Backlund, O., 1897, Vierteljahrsschr. d. Astron. Ges., 32, 8–23.Google Scholar
Batten, A.H., 1988, Resolute and undertaking characters: the lives of Wilhelm and Otto Struve, Dordrecht, Reidel, (ASSL, 139).Google Scholar
Bessel, F.W., 1818, Z. f. Astron., V, 25, (Engelmann, 1875, 3, 304–306).Google Scholar
Bessel, F.W., 1821, Astron. Beob. a. d. Königl. Univ.-Sternw. Königsberg, 6, III, (Engelmann, 1875, 2, 34–43).Google Scholar
Bessel, F.W. 1844, AN, 21, 1–32.Google Scholar
Bessel, F.W., 1846, Kurze Erinnerungen an Momente meines Lebens, In: Erman, 1852, 1, IX–XXX; (Engelmann, 1875, 1, XI-XXXI).Google Scholar
Briot, C., 1842, J. Math, pures et appl, 7, 70–84.Google Scholar
Bruhns, K., 1877, Briefwechsel zwischen A. v. Humboldt und Gauss, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Busch, A.L., 1852, Systematisches Verzeichniss der in der Bibliothek der Königl. Universitäts-Sternwarte zu Königsberg enthaltenen Bücher, Astron. Beob. a. d. Königl. Univ.-Sternw. Königsberg, 25.Google Scholar
Busch, A.L. 1856, Astron. Beob. a. d. Königl. Univ.-Sternw. Königsberg, 27.Google Scholar
Chandler, S.C., 1891, AJ, 11, 59–61.Google Scholar
Chandler, S.C., 1892, AJ, 12, 97–101.Google Scholar
Chandler, S.C., 1902, AJ, 22, 89–92.Google Scholar
Eneström, G., 1910, Verzeichnis der Schriften Leonhard Eulers, Jahresber. DMV, Erg.-Bd. IV, Leipzig, Teubner.Google Scholar
Engelmann, R. (ed.), 1875, Abhandlungen von Friedrich Wilhelm Bessel, 3 Vols., Leipzig, Engelmann 1875-76.Google Scholar
Erman, A. (ed.), 1852, Briefwechsel zwischen Olbers, W. und Bessel, F. W., 2 Vols., Leipzig, Avenarius & Mendelssohn.Google Scholar
Euler, L., 1751, Mém. Acad. Sci. Berlin, 5 (1749), 289–325.Google Scholar
Euler, L. 1752, Mém. Acad. Sci. Berlin, 6 (1750), 185–217.Google Scholar
Euler, L. 1765a, Mém. Acad. Sci. Berlin, 14 (1758), 131–153.Google Scholar
Euler, L. 1765b, Mém. Acad. Sci. Berlin, 14 (1758), 154–193.Google Scholar
Euler, L. 1765c, Theoria motus corporum solidorum seu rigidorum, Rostochii et Gryphiswaldiae, A.F. Rose MDCCLXV.Google Scholar
Euler, L. 1766, Mém. Acad. Sci. Berlin, 15 (1759), 265–309.Google Scholar
Euler, L. 1767, Mém. Acad. Sci. Berlin, 16 (1760), 176–227.Google Scholar
Freiesleben, H.C. 1974, In: Gillispie (1970), 10, 542.Google Scholar
Fricke, W. 1970, In: Gillispie (1970), 2, 97–102.Google Scholar
Gillispie, C.C. (ed.) 1970, Dictionary of scientific biography, 16 Vols., New York, Scribner 1970-80.Google Scholar
Grattan-Guinness, I. 1990, Convolutions in French Mathematics, 1800 - 1840, 3 Vols., Basel, Birkhäuser, (Science Networks, 3).Google Scholar
Hagen, J.G. 1894, AN, 136, 207–208.Google Scholar
Harzer, P. 1923, Vierteljahrsschr. d. Astron. Ges., 58, 50–73.Google Scholar
Ivanof, A. 1894, AJ, 14, 180–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivanof, A. 1895, Bull, astron., 2, 106–111.Google Scholar
Jacobi, C.G.J. 1850, J. f. d. reine u. angew. Math., 39, 293–350.Google Scholar
Juliien, P. M. 1855, Problèmes de mécanique rationelle, 2 Vols., Paris, Mallet-Bachelier.Google Scholar
Kimura, H. 1917, MNRAS, 78, 163–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, F. et al. 1901, Encycl. Math. Wiss., IV/6, T. 1, Leipzig, Teubner 1901-1908.Google Scholar
KPAW 1880, Briefwechsel zwischen Gauss und Bessel. Hrsg. auf Veranl. d. Königl. Preuss. Akad. d. Wiss., Leipzig, Engelmann.Google Scholar
Küstner, F. 1888, Neue Methode zur Bestimmung der Aberrations-Constante nebst Untersuchungen über die Veränderlichkeit der Polhöhe, Berlin, Schade.Google Scholar
Lagrange, J.-L. 1788, Méchanique analitique, Paris, Desaint.Google Scholar
Laplace, P.S. 1798, Mém. Classe Inst. France, (1795-96), 301–376.Google Scholar
Laplace, P.S. 1799, Traité de mécanique céleste, 5 Vols., Paris, Bachelier/Duprat 1799-1829.Google Scholar
Lawrynowicz, K. 1995, Friedrich Wilhelm Bessel, 1784-1846, Basel, Birkhäuser, (Vita Mathematica, 9).Google Scholar
Nyrén, M. 1872, Mém. Acad. Imp. Sci. St.-Pétersb., VII, 19 (2), 1–64.Google Scholar
Nyrén, M. 1873, Mém. Acad. Imp. Sci. St.-Pétersb., VII, 19 (10), 1–40.Google Scholar
Peters, C.A.F. 1844a, Mém. Acad. Imp. Sci. St.-Pétersb., VI, 3, 125–227.Google Scholar
Peters, C.A.F. 1844b, Bull. Classe Phys.-Math. Acad. Imp. Sci. St.-Pétersb., 2, 305–352.Google Scholar
Peters, C.A.F. 1845a, AN, 22, 33–42.Google Scholar
Peters, C.A.F. 1845b, AN, 22, 71–80, 81-96, 103-110, 119–128.Google Scholar
Peters, C.A.F. 1852, Uebersicht der Leistungen Bessel’s in der Stellar-Astronomie und in der Theorie der astronomischen Instrumente. Vortr. am 12. Nov. 1849 in der physik.-ökon. Ges. Königsberg, (Königsb. naturwiss. Unterhalt., II, 101–140).Google Scholar
Peters, C.A.F. 1853a, Mém. Acad. Imp. Sci. St.-Pétersb., VI, 5, 1–180.Google Scholar
Peters, C.A.F. 1853b, Mém. Acad. Imp. Sci. St.-Pétersb., VI, 5, 181–201.Google Scholar
Poinsot, L. 1834, Théorie nouvelle de la rotation des corps, Paris, Bachelier.Google Scholar
Poinsot, L. 1842, Eléments de statique, 8. ed., Paris, Bachelier, 485–526.Google Scholar
Poinsot, L. 1851, J. Math, pures et appl., 16, 9–129, 289–336.Google Scholar
Poisson, S.-D. 1809, J. Ecole Polytechn., (1)8, 198–218.Google Scholar
Poisson, S.-D. 1811, Traité de mécanique, 2 Vols., Paris, Courcier.Google Scholar
Poisson, S.-D. 1827, Mém. Acad. Sci. Paris, 7, 199–265.Google Scholar
Poisson, S.-D. 1833, Traité de mécanique. 2 Vols, 2. éd., Paris, Bachelier.Google Scholar
Poisson, S.-D. 1838, Mém. Acad. Sci. Paris, 14, 275–432.Google Scholar
Przybyllok, E. 1915, AN, 201, 209–218.Google Scholar
Przybyllok, E. 1931, AN, 242, 365–368.Google Scholar
Repsold, J.A. 1919, AN, 210, 161–214.Google Scholar
Schilling, C. (ed.) 1900, Wilhelm Olbers - Sein Leben und seine Werke, 2, Berlin, Springer.Google Scholar
Schumacher, H.C. 1841, AN, 18, 33–48.Google Scholar
Segner, J.A. 1755, Specimen theoriae turbinum, Halle.Google Scholar
Sokolovskaya, Z.K. 1976, In: Gillispie (1970), 13, 108–121.Google Scholar
Stäckel, P. 1905, In: Klein, F. et al. (1901), 435–691.Google Scholar
Struve, O. 1865, Übersicht der Thätigkeit der Nicolai-Hauptsternwarte während der ersten 25 Jahre ihres Bestehens, St. Petersburg, Kaiserl. Akad. Wiss.Google Scholar
Struve, O. 1872, Observations de Poulkova, IV, St.- Pétersb., Acad. Imp. Sci.Google Scholar
Struve, F.G.W. 1845, Description de l’Observatoire astronomique central de Poulkova, St.-Pétersb., Acad. Imp. des Sei.Google Scholar
Verdun, A. 1996, ORION, 273, 97–102.Google Scholar
Wanach, B. 1916, Resultate des Internationalen Breitendienstes, 5, Berlin, Reimer.Google Scholar
Wilson, C. 1987, Arch. Hist. Ex. Sci., 37, 233–273.Google Scholar
Winnecke, A. 1881, Vierteljahrsschr. d. Astron. Ges., 16, 5–8.Google Scholar
Winter, E. 1957, Die Registres der Berliner Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1746-1766, Berlin, Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar