Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T01:52:50.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dust in Planetary Ring Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

Mark R. Showalter*
Affiliation:
Center for Radar AstronomyStanford UniversityStanford, CA 94305U.S.A.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Each of the outer gas giants Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune is now known to be encircled by a system of rings. Some of these, such as the A, B, and C rings of Saturn and the nine narrow Uranian rings, are rather optically thick and are composed primarily of large bodies (1 cm to 10 m). However, every other system has been found to contain a large population of micron-sized dust. Such rings reveal the effects of a variety of physical processes that are also acting on interplanetary and interstellar grains. When such rings are examined as members of a general class, recurring patterns begin to emerge.

Type
Circumplanetary Dust: Collisional and Electrostatic Processes
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1991

References

Burns, J.A., Cuzzi, J. N., and Showalter, M. R. (1983). Discovery of gossamer rings. Bull. Amer. Astron. Soc. 15, 10131014.Google Scholar
Burns, J.A., Showalter, M. R., and Morfill, G. (1984). The ethereal rings of Jupiter and Satum. In Planetary Rings (Greenberg, R. and Brahic, A., Eds.), pp. 200272. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Burns, J.A., Schaffer, L. E., Greenberg, R.J., and Showalter, M. R. (1985). Lorentz resonances and the structure of the Jovian ring. Nature 316, 115119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, J.A., and Horanyi, M. (1990). Dynamics of the dust in Saturn’s E ring. Bull. Amer. Astron. Soc. 22, 1042.Google Scholar
Colwell, J. E., and Esposito, L. W. (1990). A numerical model of the Uranian dust rings. Icarus, in press.Google Scholar
Cuzzi, J.N.. and Burns, J. A. (1988). Charged particle depletion surrounding Saturn’s F ring: Evidence for a moonlet belt? Icarus 74, 284324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuzzi, J.N.. Cooper, J. F., Hood, L.L., and Showalter, M. R. (1989). Abundance and size distribution of ring material outside the main rings of Satum. In Cassini Mission Proposal Package. JPLPD 699-11, 13, (5-1H5-F-7).Google Scholar
Marley, M.S., and Porco, C. C. (1990). D ring features and f-mode oscillations of Saturn. Bull. Amer. Astron.Soc. 22, 1041.Google Scholar
Ockert, M.E., Cuzzi, J. N., Porco, C. C., and Johnson, T. V. (1987). Uranian ring photometry: Results from Voyager 2. J. Geophys. Res. 92, 1496914978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ockert, M.E., Pollack, J. B., and Showalter, M. R. (1988). Voyager photometry of Saturn’s F ring II: the results. Bull Amer. Astron. Soc. 20, 854.Google Scholar
Showalter, M.R., Burns, J. A., Cuzzi, J.N., and Pollack, J. B. (1985). The discovery of Jupiter’s “gossamer” ring. Nature 316, 526528.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Showalter, M.R., Burns, J. A., Cuzzi, J.N., and Pollack, J. B. (1987). Jupiter’s ring system: New results on structure and particle properties. Icarus 69, 458498.Google Scholar
Showalter, M.R. (1990). Visual detection of 1981S13, the Encke gap moonlet. Bull. Amer. Astron. Soc. 22, 10401041.Google Scholar
Showalter, M.R., Cuzzi, J. N., and Larson, S. M. (1991). Structure and particle properties of Saturn’s E ring. Submitted.Google Scholar
Smith, B.A., et al. (1981). Encounter with Saturn: Voyager 1 imaging science results. Science 212, 163191.Google Scholar
Smith, B.A., et al. (1982). A new look at the Saturn system: The Voyager 2 images. Science 215, 504537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, B.A., et al. (1986). Voyager 2 in the Uranian system: Imaging science results. Science 233, 4364.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, B.A., et al. (1989). Voyager 2 at Neptune: Imaging science results. Science 246, 14221449.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Allen, J.A. (1983). Absorption of energetic protons by Saturn’s G ring. J. Geophys. Res. 88, 69116918.Google Scholar