No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Do Average Hamiltonians Exist?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 April 2016
Abstract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
The word “average” and its variations became popular in the sixties and implicitly carried the idea that “averaging” methods lead to “average” Hamiltonians. However, given the Hamiltonian H = H0(J) + ϵR(θ,J),(ϵ ≪ 1), the problem of transforming it into a new Hamiltonian H* (J*) (dependent only on the new actions J*), through a canonical transformation given by zero-average trigonometrical series has no general solution at orders higher than the first.
- Type
- Analytical and Numerical Tools
- Information
- International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 172: Impact of Modern Dynamics in Astronomy , 1999 , pp. 243 - 248
- Copyright
- Copyright © Kluwer 1999
References
Brouwer, D.: 1959, Solution of the problem of artificial satellite theory without drag, Astron. J., 64, 378–397.Google Scholar
Deprit, A.: 1969, Canonical transformation depending on a small parameter, Cel. Mech. & Dyn. Astr., 1, 12–30.Google Scholar
Hori, G.-I.: 1966, Theory of General Perturbations with Unspecified Canonical Variables, Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan, 18, 287–296.Google Scholar
Kolmogorov, A.N.: 1954, Preservation of conditionally periodic movements with small change in Hamiltonian function, Dokl. Akad. Nauk, 98, 527–530.Google Scholar
Milani, A.; Nobili, A.M. and Carpino, M.: 1987, Secular variations of the semimajor axes: theory and experiments, Astron. Astrophys., 172, 265–279.Google Scholar
Poincaré, H.: 1893, Les Méthodes Nouvelles de la Mécanique Celeste, Gauthier-Villars, Paris, Vol.II.Google Scholar
You have
Access