Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T11:10:05.871Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Disconnection of Coronal Field Lines Due to the Emergence of New Photo-Spheric Flux as the Cause of CMES & Interplanetary Shocks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

S. Bravo
S. Bravo*
Affiliation:
Instituto de Geofísica, UNAM Coyoacán, D.F., 04510México

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A scenario is presented whereby CMEs and interplanetary shocks are consequences of a large scale rearrangement of the coronal magnetic field induced by the disconnection of field lines from the solar surface due to the emergence of flux with opposite polarity. In this scenario the CME is the mass released from the previously closed structure and the interplanetary shock is formed by the injection of faster solar wind from an extended or newly created coronal hole which results from the opening of the field lines. Here CMEs and interplanetary shocks are associated events, but not cause-effect related. Observational and computational evidence supporting this view is provided.

Keywords

Solar activityCMEsInterplanetary shocks
Type
Quasi-Static Structures
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 154: Solar and Interplanetary Transients , 1996 , pp. 123 - 127
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1997

References

Bravo, S.: 1993, Adv. Space Res. 13(9), 371.Google Scholar
Bravo, S.: 1994, Geofis. Int. 33, 333.Google Scholar
Bravo, S. and Lanzagorta, M.: 1994, in Baker, D.N., Papitashvili, V.O., and Teague, M.J.(eds.), Solar Terrestrial Energy Program, Pergamon Press, p. 227.Google Scholar
Bravo, S. and Pérez-Enríquez, R.: 1994, Rev. Mex. Astron. Astrofis. 38, 17.Google Scholar
Bravo, S. and Nikiforova, E.: 1994, Solar Phys. 151, 333.Google Scholar
Bravo, S. and Rivera, A.L.: 1994, Ann. Geophys. 12, 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gold, T., Gas Dynamics of Cosmic Clouds, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1955.Google Scholar
Hewish, A. and Bravo, S.: 1986, Solar Phys. 106, 185.Google Scholar
Hildner, E., Gosling, J.T., Hansen, R.T., and Bohlin, J.D.: 1975, Solar Phys. 45, 363.Google Scholar
Illing, R.M.E. and Hundhausen, A.: 1986, J. Geophys. Res. 91, 10 951.Google Scholar
Levine, R.C., Altschuier, M.D., and Harvey, J.W.; 1977, J. Geophys. R. 82, 1061.Google Scholar
Parker, E.N.: 1961, Astrophys. J. 133, 1014.Google Scholar
Sheeley, N.R. Jr., Howard, R.A., Koomen, M.J., Michels, D.J., Schwenn, R. Mulhauser, K.H., and Rosenbauer, H.: 1985, J. Geophys. Res. 90, 163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Y.M. and Sheeley, N.R. Jr., : 1990, Astrophys. J. 355, 726.Google Scholar
Watanabe, T., Kojima, M., Ohyama, M., Tsuneta, S., Acton, L.W., Harvey, K.L., Joselyn, J.A., and Klimchuk, J.A.: 1994, in Baker, D.N., Papitashvili, V.O., and Teague, M.J.(eds.), Solar Terrestrial Energy Program, Pergamon Press, p. 186.Google Scholar
Zhang, G.L. and Wang, C.: 1993, Adv. Space Res. 13(9), 59.Google Scholar