Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-13T03:39:39.425Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Differential Rotation in the Solar Interior

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

Maurice J. Clement
Maurice J. Clement*
Affiliation:
David Dunlap Observatory, University of Toronto, Canada

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

One of the big problems in stellar rotation which has been the object of much debate recently concerns the magnitude of the angular velocity in the central regions of the sun. It is a good example of our general ignorance of the distribution of angular momentum in the interiors of stars. There is good reason, of course, for this ignorance. One can’t make any direct observations and from a theoretical point of view there are many real problems such as the lack of a good theory of convection and meridian circulation, and our ignorance of the structure and magnitude of magnetic fields in the deep stellar interior. These problems among others make it very difficult, for example, to specify a surface condition on the angular velocity. It was pointed out recently (Clement, 1969; this paper is referred to hereinafter as Paper I) that such a condition might enable us to estimate the magnitude of the interior stellar rotation.

Type
Part IV / The Rotation of the Sun
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 4: Stellar Rotation , 1970 , pp. 346 - 351
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1970

References

Allen, C. W.: 1963, Astrophysical Quantities, 2nd ed., University of London, Athlone Press, p. 179.Google Scholar
Clement, M. J.: 1969, Astrophys. J. 156, 1051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldreich, P. and Schubert, G.: 1967, Astrophys. J. 150, 571.Google Scholar
Roxburgh, I. W. 1964, Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 128, 157.Google Scholar
Schwarzschild, M.: 1947, Astrophys. J. 106, 427.Google Scholar