Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-r8w4l Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-08T01:46:08.695Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Did SU UMa Undergo a Classical Nova Outburst?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

M.F. Bode ,
A. Evans  and
A. Bruch
M.F. Bode
Affiliation:
Dept. of Physics, University of Keele, U.K.
A. Evans
Affiliation:
Dept. of Physics, University of Keele, U.K.
A. Bruch
Affiliation:
Astronomical Institute, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität, Münster, F.R.G.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Recent observations of an apparent soft X-ray halo around the dwarf nova SU UHa have led to speculation that this may well be evidence of the object having undergone a classical nova-like outburst within historical times (Cordova and Mason 1980). By combining the relationship between quiescent X-ray luminosity and speed class for classical novae and the observed X-ray luminosity of SU UMa we derive a distance dependent apparent magnitude at outburst for the object. Distance estimates for SU UMa and absolute magnitude ranges for classical novae then determine the apparent magnitude of an outburst more exactly. From the angular size of the halo and the absolute magnitude - ejection velocity relationship for classical novae we derive the approximate date of any outburst. Comparison with historical records does not reveal any promising candidates. An alternative interpretation of the halo in terms of scattering of soft X-rays from dwarf nova outbursts by interstellar grains is suggested.

Type
Part IV: Cataclysmic Binaries and their Role in Stellar Evolution
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 69: Binary and Multiple Stars as Tracers of Stellar Evolution , 1982 , pp. 475 - 481
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1982

References

Becker, R.H. and Marshall, F.E., 1981, Astrophys. J. Letters, 244, L93.Google Scholar
Bruch, A., 1981, preprintGoogle Scholar
Cordova, F.A. and Mason, K.O., 1980, Nature, 287, 25.Google Scholar
Cordova, F.A., Mason, K.O. and Nelson, J.E., 1981, Astrophys. J., 245, 609.Google Scholar
Ferland, G.J. and Truran, J.W., 1981, Astrophys. J., 244, 1022 Google Scholar
Gallagher, J.S., 1977, Astron. J., 82,209.Google Scholar
Hutchings, J.B., 1980, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacific, 92, 458.Google Scholar
Imaeda, K. and Kiang, T., 1980, Journ. Hist. Astron., 11, 77.Google Scholar
Lundmark, K., 1921, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacific, 33, 225.Google Scholar
Martin, P.G., 1978, Cosmic Dust, 67(Oxford).Google Scholar
McLaughlin, D.B., 1960, in Stars and Stellar Systems, 6, 585.Google Scholar
Payne-Gaposchkin, C., 1957, The Galactic Novae (Dover).Google Scholar
Rolf, D., 1980, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Leicester Stephenson, F.R., 1981, private communication.Google Scholar
Vogt, N., 1981, Habilitationsschrift,Bochum.Google Scholar
Vogt, N., 1982, ‘Remarks on the Evolutionary Status of Cataclysmic Variables’, this volume, 415.Google Scholar