No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 April 2016
In this review the problem of measuring velocity field in stellar atmospheres from the observer’s point of view is presented. Our purpose here is to discuss observational methods in which detailed analysis of line profiles is not necessary, i.e. methods based on measurements of total absorption of lines (curve of growth and narrowband photometry), methods based on measurements of widths of lines (Goldberg-Unno method and curve of line width correlation) and measurements of differential line shifts. Therefore, our review will be limited to the discussion of basic assumptions of each method, to the analysis of their advantages and disadvantages, to a specification of a quantity which can be derived from a given method and finally to a brief presentation of the results. Usually, the low resolution methods provide an information about a particular component of the stellar velocity field. But the problem is more complicated as we do not know if particular components can be isolated from the stellar velocity field, thus, we do not know the real physical meaning of the measurable parameters. In this paper we shall adopt classical concept of micro- and macro-turbulence and convective type velocity. This simplified picture was criticized since 15 years on every colloquium devoted to hydrodynamic phenomena in the stellar atmospheres, but until now the theoreticians have not succeded in developing a theory which would satisfactorily interpret the observations.