Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:01:04.546Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Constraints for Cataclysmic Binary Evolution as Derived from Space Distributions*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

H. W. Duerbeck
H. W. Duerbeck*
Affiliation:
Observatorium Hoher List der Universitäts-Sternwarte Bonn, Daun, F.R.G.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Space densities and galactic z-distributions of novae, recurrent novae, dwarf novae and symbiotic stars are newly determined and discussed in the context of earlier determinations. The data are then compared with the distributions of single and binary stars of possibly related types (late type giants, Mira variables, Algol systems, W UMa systems).

Novae and dwarf novae have similar distributions, those of fairly young stellar populations. The observed space density of potential novae (novalike objects) indicates that the mean recurrence time of novae might be as small as a few hundred years, which leads, with given nova shell masses and mass transfer rates in the minimum stage, to a secular decrease of the masses of the components undergoing nova outbursts.

Recurrent novae and symbiotic stars have distributions of older stellar populations, similar to those of late type giants and Mira variables.

On the basis of galactic distribution, novae and dwarf novae are closely related and may be final stages of W UMa systems, as well as progenitors of supernovae of type I. A small fraction of W UMa systems seems to belong to an older population. If evolutionary transitions between these types of stars can be substantiated, the presence of a minority of novae and dwarf novae in globular clusters and of supernovae I in elliptical galaxies can be explained.

Due to the lack of sufficiently well determined space distributions of Algol binaries, the suggestion that long-period Algol systems might be the progenitors of cataclysmic binaries can as yet neither be substantiated nor refuted. A very high space density of long-period Algol systems in the solar neighbourhood is derived. The observed space density of cataclysmic binaries could be explained by the transformation of a small percentage of the long-period Algol systems by common envelope evolution.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 80: Double Stars, Physical Properties and Generic Relations , 1984 , pp. 363 - 385
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1984

Footnotes

*

Paper presented at the Lembang-Bamberg IAU Colloquium No. 80 on ‘Double Stars: Physical Properties and Generic Relations', held at Bandung, Indonesia, 3-7 June, 1983.

References

Allen, C. W.: 1954, Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 114, 387.Google Scholar
Allen, C. W.: 1973, Astrophysical Quantities, 3rd edition (and previous editions), Athlone Press, London.Google Scholar
Allen, D. A.: 1979, in Bateson, F. M. et al. (eds.), ‘Changing Trends in Variable Star Research', IAU Colloq. 46, 125.Google Scholar
Allen, D. A.: 1980, Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 192, 521.Google Scholar
Baade, W.: 1958, in O'Connell, D. J. K. (ed.), ‘Stellar Populations', Rie. Astron. Spec. Vatican 5, 165.Google Scholar
Bailey, J.: 1981, Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 197, 31.Google Scholar
Barlow, M. J., Brodie, J. P., Brunt, C. C., Hanes, D. A., Hill, P. W., Mayo, S. K., Pringle, J. E., Ward, M. J., Watson, M. G., Whelan, J. A. J., and Willis, A. J.: 1981, Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 195, 61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batten, A. H., Fletcher, J. M., and Mann, P. J.: 1978, Pubi. Dominion Astrophys. Obs. Victoria 15, 121.Google Scholar
Bruch, A.: 1982, Ph.D. thesis, Münster University.Google Scholar
Bruch, A., Duerbeck, H. W., and Seitter, W. C.: 1981, Mitt. Astron. Ges. 52, 34.Google Scholar
Budding, E.: 1983, Astrophys. Space Sci. 99, (this issue).Google Scholar
Cahn, J. H. and Wyatt, S. P.: 1978, in Terzian, Y. (ed.), ‘Planetary Nebulae', IAU Symp. 76, 3.Google Scholar
Dinerstein, H. and Hoffleit, D.: 1973, Inf. Bull. Var. Stars, No. 845.Google Scholar
Duerbeck, H. W.: 1980, Habilitation thesis, Bonn.Google Scholar
Duerbeck, H. W.: 1981, Pubi. Astron. Soc. Pacific 93, 165.Google Scholar
Duerbeck, H. W. and Seitter, W. C.: 1979, ESO Messenger 17, 1; see also Mitt. Astron. Ges. 50, 90 (1980).Google Scholar
Duerbeck, H. W. and Seitter, W. G.: 1982, in Schaifers, K. and Voigt, H. H. (eds.), Landolt-Börnstein N.S. VI/2, 197.Google Scholar
Eggleton, P. P.: 1983, in Livio, M. and Shaviv, G. (eds.), ‘Cataclysmic Variables and Related Objects', IAU Colloq. 72, 239.Google Scholar
Eggleton, P. P., Mitton, S., and Whelan, J. A. J. (eds.): 1976, in ‘Structure and Evolution of Close Binary Stars', IAU Symp. 73.Google Scholar
Garrison, R. F., Hiltner, W. A., and Schild, R. E.: 1982, IAU Cire, No. 3730.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, M.: 1983, private communication.Google Scholar
Hudec, R.: 1981, Bull. Astron. Inst. Czech. 32, 93.Google Scholar
Iwanowska, W. and Burnicki, A.: 1962, Bull. Acad. Pol. Sci. Ser. Sci. Math. Astron. Phys. 10 (10), 537.Google Scholar
Johnson, H. M. and MacLeod, J. M.: 1963, Pubi. Astron. Soc. Pacifie 75, 123.Google Scholar
Kamper, K. W.: 1979, in van Horn, H. M. and Weidemann, V. (eds.), ‘White Dwarfs and Variable Degenerate Stars', IAU Colloq. 53, 494.Google Scholar
Kholopov, P. N.: 1981, Perem. Zvezdy 21, 465.Google Scholar
Kopylov, I. M.: 1957, in Herbig, G. H. (ed.), ‘Non-Stable Stars', IAU Symp. 3, 71.Google Scholar
Kraft, R. P.: 1962, Astrophys. J. 135, 408.Google Scholar
Kraft, R. P.: 1965, Astrophys. J. 142, 1588.Google Scholar
Kraft, R. P.: 1967, Pub!. Astron. Soc. Pacific 79, 395.Google Scholar
Kraft, R. P. and Luyten, W.: 1965, Astrophys. J. 142, 1041.Google Scholar
Kukarkin, B. W.: 1954, Untersuchung der Struktur und Entwicklung der Sternsysteme auf der Grundlage des Studiums veränderlicher Sterne, Akademie-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
Law, W. Y. and Ritter, H.: 1983, Astron. Astrophys. 123, 33.Google Scholar
Margon, B., Downes, R. A., and Gunn, J. E.: 1981, Astrophys. J. 247, L89.Google Scholar
Mayall, M. W.: 1949, Pubi. Astron. Soc. Pacific 54, 191.Google Scholar
Meyer-Hofmeister, E.: 1982, in Schaifers, K. and Voigt, H. H. (eds.), Landolt-Börnstein N.S. VI/2b, 152.Google Scholar
Mikami, T. and Ishida, K.: 1981, Pubi. Astron. Soc. Japan 33, 135.Google Scholar
Moffat, A. F.: 1982, private communication.Google Scholar
Neckel, Th.: 1967, Veröff. Landssternwarte Heidelberg 19.Google Scholar
Neckel, Th. and Klare, G.: 1980, Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. 42, 251.Google Scholar
Oort, J. H.: 1958, in O'Connell, D. J. K. (ed.), ‘Stellar Populations', Rie. Astron. Spec. Vatican. 5, 415.Google Scholar
Paczynski, B.: 1976, in Eggleton, P., Mitton, S., and Whelan, J. A. J. (eds.), ‘Structure and Evolution of Close Binary Systems', IAU Symp. 73, 27.Google Scholar
Paczynski, B.: 1980, in Weyman, P. A. (ed.), Highlights of Astronomy 5, D. Reidei Pubi. Co., Dordrecht, Holland, p. 27.Google Scholar
Parenago, P. P.: 1955, in ‘Principes fondamentaux de classification Stellaire', Colloque International du CNRS, CNRS, Paris, p. 13.Google Scholar
Payne-Gaposchkin, C. H.: 1977, in Friedjung, M. (ed.), Novae and Related Stars, D. Reidei Pubi. Co., Dordrecht, Holland, p. 3.Google Scholar
Flaut, L.: 1965, in Blaauw, A. and Schmidt, M. (eds.), Stars and Stellar Systems V, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, p. 311.Google Scholar
Popov, M. V.: 1964, Perem. Zvezdy 15, 115.Google Scholar
Primkulov, Sh.: 1968, Tsirk. Astron. Tashkent 8, No. 255.Google Scholar
Richter, G.: 1968, Veröffentl. Sternw. Sonneberg 7, 229.Google Scholar
Richter, G.: 1983, Inf. Bull. Var. Stars, No. 2267.Google Scholar
Ritter, H.: 1976, Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 175, 279.Google Scholar
Ritter, H.: 1983, Catalogue of Cataclysmic Binaries, MPI Astrophysik Garching, (MPA-51).Google Scholar
Robinson, E. L.: 1975, Astron. J. 80, 515.Google Scholar
Rosino, L.: 1973, Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. 9, 347.Google Scholar
Rudak, B.: 1982, in Friedjung, M. and Viotti, R. (eds.), The Nature of Symbiotic Stars', IAU Colloq. 70, 275.Google Scholar
Sahade, J.: 1959, Liège Symp. No. 9, ‘Modèles d'étoiles et évolution Stellaire', Mém. Soc. R. Liège Sér. 5, t. 3, p. 76.Google Scholar
Sawyer, H.: 1938, J. Roy. Astron. Soc. Canada 32, 69.Google Scholar
Sawyer-Hogg, H. and Wehlau, A.: 1964, J. Roy. Astron. Soc. Can. 58, 163.Google Scholar
Scheffler, H.: 1983, in Schaifers, K. and Voigt, H. H. (eds.), Landolt-Bömstein N.S. VI/2c, 175.Google Scholar
Schmidt-Kaler, Th.: 1957, Z. Astrophys. 41, 182.Google Scholar
Schmidt-Kaler, Th.: 1962, Kl. Veröffentl. Remeis-Sternw. Bamberg 34, 109.Google Scholar
Schmidt-Kaler, Th.: 1982, in Schaifers, K. and Voigt, H. H. (eds.), Landolt-Bömstein N. S. VI/2b, 1.Google Scholar
Shapley, H.: 1948, Harvard Obs. Monograph 7, 249.Google Scholar
Shu, F. H.: 1980, in Plavec, M. J., Popper, D. M., and Ulrich, R. K. (eds.), ‘Close Binary Stars: Observations and Interpretation', IAU Symp. 88, 477.Google Scholar
Smak, J.: 1982, Acta Astron. 32, 213.Google Scholar
Starrfield, S., Truran, J. W., and Sparks, W. M.: 1981, Astrophys. J. 243, L27.Google Scholar
Svetchnikov, M. A., Istomin, L. F., and Grehova, O. A.: 1980, Perem. Zvezdy 21, 399.Google Scholar
Trimble, V.: 1983, Nature 303, 137.Google Scholar
Tsvetkov, D. Yu.: 1981, Soviet Astron. Letters 7, 254.Google Scholar
Upgren, A. R.: 1963, Astron. J. 68, 475.Google Scholar
Van 't Veer, F.: 1975, Astron. Astrophys. 40, 167.Google Scholar
Vasilevskis, S., Harlan, E. A., Klemola, A. R., and Wirtanen, C. A.: 1975, Pubi. Lick Obs. 22, Pt. 5.Google Scholar
Vidal, N. V. and Rodgers, A. W.: 1974, Pubi. Astron. Soc. Pacifie 86, 26.Google Scholar
Vilhu, O.: 1981, Astrophys. Space Sci. 78, 401.Google Scholar
Voikhanskaya, N. F.: 1973, Astrofiz. Issled 5, 89.Google Scholar
Vogt, N.: 1981, Habilitation thesis, Bochum University.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, G.: 1981, Observatory 101, 172.Google Scholar
Warner, B.: 1974a, Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 167, 61p.Google Scholar
Warner, B.: 1974b, Monthly Notices Astron. Soc. Southern Africa 33, 21.Google Scholar
Webbink, R. F.: 1976, Astrophys. J. 209, 829.Google Scholar
Webbink, R. F.: 1978, Pub!. Astron. Soc. Pacific 90, 57.Google Scholar
Webbink, R. F.: 1980, in Plavec, M. J., Popper, D. M., and Ulrich, R. K. (eds.), ‘Close Binary Stars: Observations and Interpretation', IAU Symp. 88, 561.Google Scholar
Wenzel, W. and Meinunger, I.: 1978, Astron. Nachr. 299, 237.Google Scholar
Yungelson, L. R.: 1982, in Tremko, J. (ed.), Ejection and Accretion of Matter in Binary Systems, Veda, Bratislava, p. 11. Google Scholar