Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:02:52.167Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparison of ELP-2000 to a JPL Numerical Integration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

Jean Chapront  and
Michelle Chapront-Touzé
Jean Chapront
Affiliation:
Bureau des Longitudes. Equipe de Recherche Associée au CNRS
Michelle Chapront-Touzé
Affiliation:
Bureau des Longitudes. Equipe de Recherche Associée au CNRS

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This contribution is an outline of the main results obtained by the authors in comparing their solution ELP-2000, to a JPL numerical integration, LE-51. A full paper containing discussions and comments on the results will be proposed to Astronomy ’ Astrophysics.

A solution for the orbital motion of the Moon has been built by the authors. It is named ELP-2000, the epoch of reference being J2000. It is a semi-analytical solution, its structure being quite similar to Brown-Eckert’s one, as it appears in the Improved Lunar Ephemeris, ILE, j=2, (Eckert et al., 1954). The main purpose of this work is to present the results of a comparison of a provisional but complete solution, to an external numerical integration, LE-51, built at JPL (Williams, 1980), and fitted to lunar laser rangings. The JPL numerical integration is regarded as an “observational model”. It is a first attempt to compare as a whole, a new lunar ephemeris, derived from a semi-analytical theory, to observations, via a numerical integration.

Type
Part III
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 63: High-Precision Earth Rotation and Earth-Moon Dynamics , May 1981 , pp. 257 - 264
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1982

References

Bretagnon, P., 1980: Astron. S Astrophys. 84, 329 Google Scholar
Bretagnon, P., 1980: Planetary Theory VSOP-80. Magnetic Tape. Google Scholar
Bretagnon, P., Chapront, J., 1981: Astron. S Astrophys. To be publishedGoogle Scholar
Brumberg, V.A., 1972: Relativistic Celestial Mechanics. Nauka. Moscow.Google Scholar
Chapront-Touze, M., 1980: Astron. a Astrophys. 83, 86.Google Scholar
Chapront-Touze, M., Chapront, J., 1980: Astron. & Astrophys. 91, 233.Google Scholar
Chapront-Touze, M., 1982: Celes. Meoh. 26, 53, 63.Google Scholar
Eckert, W.J., Jones, R., Clark, H.K., 1954: Improved Lunar Ephemeris U.S. Government Printing Office. Washington.Google Scholar
Eckert, N.J., 1965: Astron. J. 70, 10, 787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henrard, J., 1980: SALE. Perturbations by the figures of Earth & Moon. Tables. Facultés Universitaires de Namur.Google Scholar
Lestrade, F., Chapront, J., Chapront-Touze, M., 1982, these proceedings, 217.Google Scholar
Oesterwinter, C, Cohen, C.J., 1972: Celes. Mech. 5, 317.Google Scholar
Martin, C.F., Van Flandern, T.C., 1970: Science, 168, 246 Google Scholar
Standish, M., 1980: Development Ephemeris DE 102. Magnetic Tape.Google Scholar
Williams, J.G., 1980: Lunar Ephemeris LE51. Magnetic Tape.Google Scholar
Williams, J.G., Sinclair, W.S., Yoder, C.F., 1978: Geophysical Research Letters 5, 11, 943 Google Scholar